Jump to content

Timex 'watercolors'


Len33

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know how to get the movement out of this watch?

When viewed under a stereo microscope, there is no joint to be found around the front

or anywhere else.

(Only the bezel is removable)

From the inside, it is plain to see that the dial is under the edge of a section of moulded 

plastic edge; so it has to come out through the front.

What on earth is holding this watch movement in place!

I tried a watch crystal lift to see if that was the way forward.

However, the crystal refused to move and, to avoid damaging the edge of the crystal

I dumped that idea.

Is it really cemented together and never intended to be taken apart, or what!

Over to you, for any ideas and suggestions.

 

 

 

IMG_2733.JPG

IMG_2734.JPG

IMG_2735.JPG

IMG_2736.JPG

IMG_2738.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These watches where produced by Timex as direct competition to the Swatch watch in 1984 when the craze for cheap colourful throw away watches began to take off and like Swatch I dont think they where ever intended to be serviced, if they didnt work when changing a battery you just put them in the bin and bought a new one.

Like the Swatch I think the case is probably moulded around the glass crystal making it cheap to produce but impossible to remove without ruining the watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for you response, wIs1971, it more or less sums up what I was thinking.

A shame, really, because I was so much looking forward to stripping the case down; getting my rubber gloves on and giving it a good scrub in the sink.

Oh well, it'll have to be a quick 'cat's lick' for this and move on to the next one from my lucky dip bag of salvaged time-pieces.

Regards.

Len.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. That's why I didn't mention the crystal lift as that would only work on acrylic and this one is glass or mineral glass, I'm assuming...

I'm thinking that they inserted the movement and dial and then just pressed in the glass without thinking that someone would ever be in a situation like yours... Then again, it's a cheap watch so I guess they didn't care.

I have another solution that would work.

You can use some glue such as Hypo GS (the transparent one, for watches and jewelry) and glue something to it, and then just pull out the glass. You know, the same method some use for stubborn case backs.

The cement itself washes off with lacquer or even isopropyl if I'm not mistaken.

Edited by Chopin
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...