Jump to content

Seamaster 300 1966. Large Triangle.


ecodec

Recommended Posts

I am trying to sort out  my Grandsons Omega Seamaster 300 1966.  Non Date. Large Triangle. I wish to fit an ETA 2824 which will go in but the dial fixing pins may have different spacing so this could be a problem. I can probably get over it,  however would it be  OK  just to  remove the date ring on the 2824 ?  This may offer greater clearance. The Omega movement has serious balance issues and would be too expensive to fix and Omega will not supply parts. Any help is gratefully appreciated. Thanks and kind regards, Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ecodec said:

I am trying to sort out  my Grandsons Omega Seamaster 300 1966.  Non Date. Large Triangle. I wish to fit an ETA 2824 which will go in but the dial fixing pins may have different spacing so this could be a problem. I can probably get over it,  however would it be  OK  just to  remove the date ring on the 2824 ?  This may offer greater clearance. The Omega movement has serious balance issues and would be too expensive to fix and Omega will not supply parts. Any help is gratefully appreciated. Thanks and kind regards, Mike

I am sure you're aware that the watch is an important piece, worth easily $5,000 even with mov.t issues. Not sure what would be the point in replacing the movement with a current one but consider your Grandson could have agreed with the advice you will receive from most collectors and watch lovers: Do not butcher it.  Give to a real expert which will fix it for you. money spent on it will be well worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, jdm said:

I am sure you're aware that the watch is an important piece, worth easily $5,000 even with mov.t issues. Not sure what would be the point in replacing the movement with a current one but consider your Grandson could have agreed with the advice you will receive from most collectors and watch lovers: Do not butcher it.  Give to a real expert which will fix it for you. money spent on it will be well worth.

Thank you for your advice jdm,  Well appreciated. Now I will try to find a Cock and balance complete then pop it in and time it. Thank you very much. Best regards, Mike.

Edited by ecodec
More info.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ishima said:

I do not see how removing the date ring will help. Also keep in mind you'll have a mystical winder position that does nothing if you fit a calendar movement to a non-calendar watch. 
 

Thank you Ishima, I appreciate your comments. I will try to find a complete balance and pop it in !. Kine regards, Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fitting a ETA movement could be problematic in terms of getting it to fit and of course would devalue the watch immensely. If it was me I would identify the balance fault and fix it. If you do not have the experience then just pass it on to a professional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose this fits "best" in this forum 😃 Im looking for some wall 'art' that doubles as a reference. Specifically Id like to find an ETA 28xx or Sellita exploded movement view. 2824/2836 would be ideal. Have any of you seen/found such a thing - there seem to be a lot of these for specialized movements, and none of them ready to print or to be had as a poster. Why help is appreciated.
    • The diameter is that of the ring - afaik, will have to look it up. “Wiggle room“ doesn‘t matter as long as the spring length is in the ball park.  Essential sizes of a mainspring are thickness, width and length. Diameter is just a hint if you can push into the barrel directly or will need a winder, it is no property of the spring. Frank
    • Hi @Zendoc, I guess you're like me and you don't have a mainspring winder.  I searched GR mainspring for the AS 1686 mainspring and I now understand your dilemma. The exact one is discontinued. To answer you question more directly, I see two good alternatives for you: a) GR4485 with 1.60 x .10 x 280 x 8.5 ( I guess this one is the one you found): https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/GR4485 OR b) GR4477 with 1.60 x .095 x 320 x 9. https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/gr4477   As you know, the the AS 1686 spring is supposed to be 1.60 x .10 x 300 x 9. - both of the above will fit and you'll manage to insert them from the retention ring without need for a mainspring winder (provided you know how to do it). - GR4485 will give you more power (=higher amplitude), but less power reserve (due to shorter length) than the original. - GR4477 will give you the same power reserve as the original. However, a bit less power.   Personally, I'd take GR4477 for two reasons: 1. Well, the power reserve is better. 2. With modern lubricants and modern mainspring metal alloys, you tend to get a higher amplitude anyways. You'd maybe even end up with too much amplitude (knocking) if you go with the original size and use thin synthetic oils-- see discussion here: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10580-omega-calt17-help/#comment-248101      
    • Your setup is correct. The smallest diameter of one pulley must correspond with the largest of the other one, else not speed variation. Frank
×
×
  • Create New...