Jump to content

Old style rubbed in jewels

TimFitz

By TimFitz
in Watch Repairs Help & Advice

 Share

Recommended Posts

TimFitz WRT Addict

TimFitz

Posted
Posted

I am ready to tackle replacing a rubbed in jewel on a Hamilton  18s #934 pocket watch movement. I have done the other kinds, but have been waiting until I have been working on watches for a few years before I try this. Many people say don't buy those old watches with rubbed in jewels, why work that hard, buy more modern ones with the screws holding them In.

Well I like a challenge,  so I have an old school set of tools to do the job. (photo attached )

Does anyone have advice on the pitfalls or tricks I need to know? Maybe a link to a video?

I would be much obliged

tool.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BUSAKAZ WRT Addict

BUSAKAZ

Posted
Posted
On 01/11/2017 at 8:13 AM, oldhippy said:

Tim, theres a thread on this forum about rubbed in jewels. If you use the search you should find it. Good for you in having a go at something different.

Mark has done a video on rubbed in jewels

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 years later...
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted

The thing with rubbed in jewels is everything is wonky. The original jewels had a specific form usually quite domed with a distinct bevel on the underside. If you have a stock of antique jewels you might find one that fits your pivot _and_ fits the plate/bridge diameter. Provided you have that, often the material of the bridge/plate has become quite fragile, from time as well as being work hardened from the original burnishing. So sometimes the material that you want to reburnish crumbles apart.

 

If you don't have antique jewels, friction jewels lack the pronounced bevel that takes the burnished over material. They can be modified but it's a process with diamond paste and lathes and grinding gear. Sometimes though you get lucky and a Seitz jewel will seat and hold. You also have no adjustment for height, where the jewel seats is it.

 

On many antique pieces I will bore out the whole jewel area, including the dome often cut into the plate/bridge outside the jewel. Then make a bushing that fits well and will take a friction jewel. The bushing gets its concave dome, finished properly,  jewel gets fitted, all pressed in and you have at least a few hundredths of adjustment as well and if you use german silver on a grey bridge it's invisible (for gold plated best to plate the bushing). If it's not a Breguet or other historical piece this is often the best possible repair. For a Breguet you make the jewel, period. No boring out of that stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bonefixer
      AS2063 - hand setting

      By Bonefixer · Posted

      That will mean dismantling the gear train, which with 5 pivots to align was a pain. Probably going to have to though. I'm convinced it's something to do with the great wheel. 
    • VWatchie
      Epilame / Fixodrop

      By VWatchie · Posted

      As far as I know, the only time an epilame treatment has potential drawbacks is when something is rubbing on the treated part w/o lubrication in between creating abrasive dust. That is, I don't believe in the method of "running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed". So, I think the rule would be; do not epilame treat parts where rubbing is going on without lubrication. Other than that I don't think we have anything to worry about. That said, I'm not an expert, and I'm always happy to learn more. Has any other repairer than Alex suggested or explained the "making-a-groove" method? My impression is that it's just something he constructed in his mind. I have not perceived it as a generally practiced method. Again, I could be wrong!
    • Neverenoughwatches
      AS2063 - hand setting

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Epilame / Fixodrop

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Bonefixer
      AS2063 - hand setting

      By Bonefixer · Posted

      Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
×
×
  • Create New...