Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I was at my local watch and clock makers association meeting on the weekend and during a discussion after the meeting was finished one member raised a point that old (250 years or older) and valuable clocks or timepieces should not be cleaned with modern cleaning solutions because it could ruin them. He was taking it to mean it could damage the material the item was made from.

I have a slightly different take on this, yes the alloy of brass and quality of steel (iron) will be different to modern items, but I don't think it would so much damage it as maybe remove some of its history. Such as marking out lines from when it was made, also I would feel returning a 300 year old clock to 'as new' condition would be wrong and it should preserve its patina. There is obviously exceptions to this where an item is so far gone where restoration is the only option, but I would say in general a more conservative cleaning would be in order.

Just thought this might be an interesting topic to discuss.

I will add that I have not touched nor do I see myself working on a rare and valuable clock / timepiece in the near future.

Edited by Tmuir
correct spelling mistakes
  • Like 1
Posted

There is a train of thought amongst some clock repairers that ammonia based cleaners should not be used on older movements because it can cause stress fractures to form in brass plates  due to the process used to make them on older clocks by hammering brass plate to the correct thickness rather than rolling on more modern movements thus putting the brass under stress, but I think most are happy to use them as long as the parts cleaned are rinsed well after cleaning and exposure to them is limited.

Posted (edited)

Not a clock repairer but I would lean on whatever was best and most safe and effective to clean the hidden functional parts for that particular clock (so yes by all means consider changing cleaning method if you're worried about causing cracks or such) should be prioritised over any sentiment historical or otherwise, for visible parts such as the face and hands obviously a different mindset is necessary and I would say virtually no cleaning is the ideal (to preserve the patina) unless it's gotten to an extreme where no one would want to look at it and then you're looking at restoring. But I'm not really familiar with clock making practices, it's possible minor feats of re enameling and painting and chemical cleaning are used on the face is standard practice. 

Where's Clockboy :D

Edited by Ishima
Posted

Could be hard finding 250 year old cleaning solutions:) But i think if you are a watchmaker that work on this old clocks you should now how to work on them and now which tools and cleaners that would be right. 

Posted

This is a bit of a minefield. Some say it does some say it does not.

There is a big difference in a repair and a restore. You should never restore something that does not need restoring.

Very old brass is extremely hard and can be a sod just too even ream out, it can and will take the edge of a reamer/broach it also has tiny pockets of air which some say clock cleaning solutions can get into the pockets and the brass becomes inferior over time. I have yet to see such a thing, just how much time do they expect?  A lot depends on the type of clock, how it looked when it was new. A restore should never be different in any way from when it was new. If parts were not polished then they should never be polished now. Any marks in the plates never should be removed or polished out, this is why you should never use any type of electric machine when it comes to polishing and everything should be undertaken by hand.

Brasso is what I used to clean the plates and if parts were to be polished then a cloth would be used. All parts washed out in petrol and dried in sawdust, brushed clean to remove sawdust and French chalked, applied with a very clean brush, the chalk is taken to the brush. I had a hand soft bristle brush just for this work. French chalk stopes tarnish. If a dial is in a bad way and the customer agrees to a restore, the dial is restored to its original appearance, the same applies to the case.

This is a very basic run through.  

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for that oldhippy.

I recently purchased a watch makers handbook published in 1882 when I get a moment I will scan the pages on cleaning as it makes for some interesting reading, it talks about french chalk and brushing, but also using bread and charred bone, which neither of the last two are in my cleaning kit. :D

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you see at least one thread protruding, or even a half, then you may have a chance using this "tool", but don't squeeze hard. Lot's of patience, and if you notice any signs of loctite or other adhesives, then apply several drops of acetone on top of broken stem. Use heat (hairdrier) also. You should be able gradually turn it counterclockwise, just like i did on this broken Timex stem, which was glued with something like nail hardener. Then you can use an extender to save your broken stem. https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/513DVvkfW5L.__AC_SX300_SY300_QL70_ML2_.jpg   You can also try cutting a small grove / slot on top of the broken stem to use 0.7mm flat screwdriver.   Depending on the Crown material and Stem material, you can try dissolving the stem. 
    • How long had it been without any wind before you first put it on the timegrapher?  Perhaps there was some debris / old lubricant that loosened up while you were waiting to do the 24 hour reading? I recently serviced a Seiko 6319 that immediately after service was absolutely horrible on the timegrapher - 24 hours later (without me doing anything) it was rock solid!  I was a little surprised by this (as I have seen improvements in amplitude after letting it run in but never a watch going from useless to great!). I was suspicious that some dirt must still be in there so I took it apart and cleaned and lubcricated it again and had exactly the same experience - snow storm that after some hours turned into a nice straigh line with good amplitude 🤷‍♂️
    • Yes, I know it was able to run before just enough that everything supposed to be affixed with shellac could fall out. I won't get back to work on this watch for several days at least, but one thing you mentioned about the banking pin adjustments being intended for fork horn clearance got me wondering.... The last adjustment I made to the entry stone yesterday did not solve the problem when the balance is installed. The escape teeth can't quite clear the stone when the balance swings. But I thought it was going to work because manually snapping the fork back and forth did allow the escape wheel to advance almost all the time. I wonder if there's another issue with the impulse jewel, that I have to shellac again anyway. I am going to measure the fork slot and the jewel because I am curious if it is the right size or possibly narrower than it should be. My thinking is if the horn clearance is too great maybe it is not getting enough impulse to clear the escape tooth. But pushing the fork with a tool can move it far enough to clear the escape wheel tooth.  I'll see later in the week. I didn't expect a big challenge from this watch because it ticked for 5 minutes before stopping without shellac. As always I was way wrong.
    • I had one success (and one failure) dissolving a broken stem out of a crown with Alum. The successes was a stainless steel crown and a milder steel stem. A Tag Heuer 2000 Automatic - here with the solution at around 60ºC I could see small bubbles coming up from the stump of the stem and it took maybe 6 hours to disolve I tried to repeat this with another watch and it did nothing.....  This was A Bulova Ambassador with what again looked like a stainless steel crown.  
    • That good to know in one way.
×
×
  • Create New...