Jump to content

ETA 579.005


Recommended Posts

Good evening everyone.

 

I am currently working on a Longines Rodolfe ladies watch and am after a replacement mechanism as the original is water damaged. I have searched high and low and my usual source for parts (Cousins) shows this is obsolete as does a number of other websites. I would like to get a ETA movement 579.005 for it as this was the original and then I can refit the original Longines stamped item onto it to get it to look as original instead of getting a replacement. I have searched and searched to no avail to find a replacement ETA part that superceeded this movement etc or an actual movement.

 

Does anyone know if these are still made and if so where I can get hold of one or if a replacement code was used for this movement etc?

 

Many thanks

 

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help and the links. I had tried all the suppliers listed on this forum and was hoping to get one from the UK if possible as I saw the ones listed on American sites. Will keep searching. Thanks for the heads up regarding a 3 hand movement. Guess I could just use the movement and not fit a second hand.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a few 579.005 but not sure if they work. They look clean . So you could probably just take the circiut board from your movement and it will run. One of them even have the white crown so i think it's NOS. But could have been in a drawer for some years. There is even new battery hatches in the box. 

Send me a PM and we can work something out? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for all the replies and help everyone. I have ordered a new movement from the states so hopefully this will arrive soon. Appologies for the delay in replying to everyone who has posted. I will let you know how I get on.

 

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good evening

 

I received my new replacement movement from the states and proceeded to swap it out for the old one. I can hear you all screaming "did you test it first?" but no I didn't. I fully rebuilt the watch as I have never had a movement fail on me that was new ...until today. Dam it...........

 

I have put in two different batteries  in the hope it was a duff one albeit they were both new and the movement turns freely when you pull the crown out to the hand adjustment setting and turn it. There is no binding. The issue is that with the battery in and the crown pushed in to it's normal position it doesn't work. I thought that maybe the crown might not be going in far enough when it was cased up so tried it with the movement  uncased but no joy. 

 

Has anyone had any issues getting a new quartz movement going or is there a way to test it out with a multimeter etc. I am at a loss.

 

Many thanks

 

Andy

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a problem with the battery shape once.  It seemed that the -ve part was shorting to the +ve at the edge of the battery in the battery bay where the -ve tab leaves the bay.  I put an extra bit of insulation on the tab at that point and all worked fine afterwards.  I have noticed that whilst there are 'equivalent/replacement' batteries, in some dimensions they can differ.

ETA tend to specify Renata batteries (since they are both part of the swatch group!!!!!).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi canthus

 

I just checked the insulator and that the battery when installed did not have the +ve touching the -ve part of the watch movement. I swapped the insulator from the old movement to try but no luck. I am using Renata batteries in the new movement. Good suggestion though.

 

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you do a quartz movement swap there are a couple of things that can be perplexing.

The stem needs to be fully inserted for the battery circuit to be completed. The old stem may seem to fit but maybe it doesn't. As you suggested, testing out of the case may see the movement run OK.

The other thing that has caught me out is the pinion height. This is the axel that carries the hands. The same movement can come with different heights and too high a pinion can press on the watch crystal. This can cause slow running or even a complete stop.

Testing with a multimeter is limited to seeing battery voltage across the coil.

Cheers Neil

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...