Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm having a problem with the balance spring stud that seems to be stuck on the regulator arm. The lock screw is missing and the stud seems to be different from other ones I've seen. Has anyone ever come across a similar problem or know if the stud is the right one? I hope It wasn't set in with loctite, and I know this is a delicate situation... any advice is truly appreciated.4825b66a749bffb5b3058a93153101c5.jpg8dadb904a7d112df6c381945c21f9712.jpg4ff2b1c8f540a362c85fbe553175c0d4.jpg5177f02c426f33de56d91fa65514a93b.jpg
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I don't think that is your biggest problem (though it is a problem). Your regulator is broken - you only have the "boot" - there should be a pin at it's right (in pictures).

  • Like 1
Posted

I have had this problem & I pushed it out with my staking tool. You have to use a stump that is open both ends so the hairspring is not damaged. 

Posted
I don't think that is your biggest problem (though it is a problem). Your regulator is broken - you only have the "boot" - there should be a pin at it's right (in pictures).

Matabog, thanks... I kinda figured that something was missing from there and I've never seen these older 6498 movements.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I have had this problem & I pushed it out with my staking tool. You have to use a stump that is open both ends so the hairspring is not damaged. 

Clockboy, I'm going to attempt that tonight and hope that I can successfully remove the pin without damaging the hairspring, although the hairspring is already deformed and looks bad. I'll probably want to replace it if I can't manipulate it back to a decent shape...so this will be good practice for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 hour ago, madchops67 said:


Clockboy, I'm going to attempt that tonight and hope that I can successfully remove the pin without damaging the hairspring, although the hairspring is already deformed and looks bad. I'll probably want to replace it if I can't manipulate it back to a decent shape...so this will be good practice for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Take your time making sure you do not damage the hairspring or bend the arm. If I remember correctly the one I moved was with a firm push.

Posted
1 hour ago, clockboy said:

Take your time making sure you do not damage the hairspring or bend the arm. If I remember correctly the one I moved was with a firm push.

I tried last night to attempt to remove with a firm push as well but to no avail. I'm thinking it may have loctite considering there isn't a lock screw to hold the stud. Hopefully I can get it out with a staking tool like you mentioned, and I'll try to be careful not to damage the hairspring or damage the arm. 

Posted
I tried last night to attempt to remove with a firm push as well but to no avail. I'm thinking it may have loctite considering there isn't a lock screw to hold the stud. Hopefully I can get it out with a staking tool like you mentioned, and I'll try to be careful not to damage the hairspring or damage the arm. 

Can't you stake this out? Use a stake and a bench block


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted

Can't you stake this out? Use a stake and a bench block


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I'm going to try that and hope it works.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Success!!! Got the hairspring manipulated back to a decent shape and seems to be running smoothly than before. Thanks guys for all your input. Clockboy, I was extra careful not to damage the hairspring for it takes patience and a great of steady hands that I don't have...yet. [emoji1360] 937f122adfdfb16127e3e60c212ed403.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

This may sound a bit daft but I'm beginning to conclude that the stud clamping screw is so much missing as intentionally omitted.

I currently have a 17J UT6497 in a Le Cheminant pocket watch and a 17J UT6498 in a Summit pocket watch, both from the late 70's/early 80's, and both without stud clamping screws. I was going to try and fit a screw to the 6497 as believed it to be missing, but recently acquiring the 6498 with the same omission suggested that it was intentional. Now this post convinces me even more.

It begs the question "why?", although the stud does seem to be quite secure in both cases. Thankfully neither watch is in need of any H/S adjustment else it would be more of an issue.

  • Like 1
Posted

Marc.  Maybe the "screw" hole stops just short of breaking through into the stud hole to allow a small punch to be used to dimple the stud hole slightly.  This would allow the stud to be gripped in the hole and also allow further tightening of the stud in the hole later on if required.   Just a thought!

Posted
Could You replace the missing regulator pin? 
The end curve seems still distorted from here [emoji4]

The hairspring would definitely need a replacement, although I didn't have to fuss with the removal I was able to form the spring somewhat back to a decent shape to get the movement going. Next phase would be replace the spring and strip down into the ultrasonic cleaner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regarding the spring winders, I made my own and used copper pipe reducers as the tubes to retain the spring. You will need to cut out a section for the end of the spring to protrude but if you watch one of the many videos on this subject that will make sense. You can find a selection of sizes on Ebay for very little cost. I'll attach a pic showing one of mine.  Good luck!
    • There were things bothering me about this discussion that took me a while to figure out the problem. In the image below it appears to be the spring may be pushing up? Normally when Omega has a spring pushing up the pinion has a pivot with a bridge to hold it in place so in other words the spring can push on something that stationary as opposed to this which appears to be floating? To understand the problem with the above image we need another image of side view which I have below. In my image down below on the left-hand side it agrees with the image up above. But the only problem is the left-hand side is defective and the right-hand side image is the way it's supposed to look. Then Omega if you can access the right documents does explain how and why this problem occurs. With the pinion floating around it might be assumed that you support it when putting on all the hands but you do not because as noted below if you do this small bush on the pinion will relocate out of position exactly what we see in the image up above.   Then Omega does not mention this but there is a possibility of also damaging the pinion and causing the bush to move to where it's not supposed to be when removing the hands.   
    • Maybe show us 1) the watch, 2) timegrapher readings in DU, DD, PU, and PD.
    • The timegrapher displays significant beat error variations in the dial-up position. When the watch is lying flat (face up), the beat error is much higher than in other positions. Beat error readings are inconsistent, with especially large gaps in the face-up position.  Please help !  
    • Looks like an open-access journal that runs as a glorified pre-print server with no true peer review, so it’s not easy to judge the veracity of the conclusions.
×
×
  • Create New...