Jump to content

Which one would you like and why


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

Id go for the second of the two good quality french movement in a interesting case, the Angelus is a modern clock produced I would say sometime in the last 30 years and although Angelus being regarded as a good maker it lack's the quality of the second of the two it is definetley not a antique clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2nd one because it's cheaper :)  Neither are very old I suspect (they both say "made in"... which to me in a hint). I wouldn't buy either of those.

The first one looks modern, no natural corrosion anywhere.

The second one has 2 different styles of hands, some clearly replaced parts, looks a bit older..,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Angelus looks like a fairly modern reproduction no discoloration of the enamel dial also the brass shows no sign of tarnishing.The second clock shows lots of age discoloration and the hands on the dial are not a matching pair. But ideally, you need to look in person to see the movement to know for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be the second one for me, battle scars and all.  Whether the parts are correct for the case I don't know, but to me it is an old movement, pinned together and has a look of elderly quality.  A bit like yourself OH! :)

PS The pendulum has 3606 lightly scribed onto it which appears to match the number on the movement.  This probably indicates it's original to the clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The correct name for these original clocks is French Four Glass Clocks. Most come with a mercury compensated pendulum this means the effect of the weather will not affect the time keeping. Many have visible escapements. They come in various cases from very plain to extremely decretive and can be quite valuable. Most movements are striking on a gong or bell, although I have come across Timepieces.  I have included a photo of a nice decretive one so you can see what I mean. They would have been made from around the 1860 to about 1913 certainly not in or after WW1. Correct about the pendulum it should have the same number as the movement.

 

 

The Angelus is a modern clock and it has a bim bam movement or ting tang, two bells and two hammers and has little resemblance to the original apart from the shape of the case, it even has those terrible clips to hold parts on such as the clip holding the bell in place.

It would be the second one for me no hesitation at all.

Thanks to all for taking part.

cd6866ea8b2da7680e5f94419a5d936a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Late in replying, but I'm please to say I would of gone with the second one too, the screw on hands, nasty C clip and the general 'not old' look of the first one put me off, not to mention its hard to say, but it does look like it has cracks in the glass on the pendulum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, clockboy said:

I got it wrong I am was really surprised that the movement with a mercury pendulum has such a basic movement.
Thats why I am a amateur I suppose. B)

They are extremely good movements made with very hard brass and steel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Agree I have serviced / repaired many of these movements and they are really well made.  I just was expecting something better/unique. 

I'll see what I can do the next. I'm always looking for something different but not to difficult to keep the clock section interesting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you got the pallet fork installed in the movement when you see the train move when using the setting works? As nevenbekriev said, without the pallet fork to lock the train, the behaviour you are describing is normal. If this is happening with the pallet fork installed, you have a problem in the gear train, it should be immobile when the pallet fork is locking the escape wheel.  The fit of the circlip above the pinions on that wheel is crooked in your pictures, it should sit flat up against the upper pinion as in Marc’s picture.  Hope that helps, Mark
    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
×
×
  • Create New...