Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am probably wrong but the first one. They both have mercury pendulums but the second one looks like a standard french movement & dial looks like it is off a 400 day clock.

Posted

Id go for the second of the two good quality french movement in a interesting case, the Angelus is a modern clock produced I would say sometime in the last 30 years and although Angelus being regarded as a good maker it lack's the quality of the second of the two it is definetley not a antique clock.

Posted

2nd one because it's cheaper :)  Neither are very old I suspect (they both say "made in"... which to me in a hint). I wouldn't buy either of those.

The first one looks modern, no natural corrosion anywhere.

The second one has 2 different styles of hands, some clearly replaced parts, looks a bit older..,

Posted

the Angelus looks like a fairly modern reproduction no discoloration of the enamel dial also the brass shows no sign of tarnishing.The second clock shows lots of age discoloration and the hands on the dial are not a matching pair. But ideally, you need to look in person to see the movement to know for sure.

Posted

It would be the second one for me, battle scars and all.  Whether the parts are correct for the case I don't know, but to me it is an old movement, pinned together and has a look of elderly quality.  A bit like yourself OH! :)

PS The pendulum has 3606 lightly scribed onto it which appears to match the number on the movement.  This probably indicates it's original to the clock.

Posted

The correct name for these original clocks is French Four Glass Clocks. Most come with a mercury compensated pendulum this means the effect of the weather will not affect the time keeping. Many have visible escapements. They come in various cases from very plain to extremely decretive and can be quite valuable. Most movements are striking on a gong or bell, although I have come across Timepieces.  I have included a photo of a nice decretive one so you can see what I mean. They would have been made from around the 1860 to about 1913 certainly not in or after WW1. Correct about the pendulum it should have the same number as the movement.

 

 

The Angelus is a modern clock and it has a bim bam movement or ting tang, two bells and two hammers and has little resemblance to the original apart from the shape of the case, it even has those terrible clips to hold parts on such as the clip holding the bell in place.

It would be the second one for me no hesitation at all.

Thanks to all for taking part.

cd6866ea8b2da7680e5f94419a5d936a.jpg

Posted

Late in replying, but I'm please to say I would of gone with the second one too, the screw on hands, nasty C clip and the general 'not old' look of the first one put me off, not to mention its hard to say, but it does look like it has cracks in the glass on the pendulum.

Posted

I got it wrong I am was really surprised that the movement with a mercury pendulum has such a basic movement.
Thats why I am a amateur I suppose. B)

Posted
43 minutes ago, clockboy said:

I got it wrong I am was really surprised that the movement with a mercury pendulum has such a basic movement.
Thats why I am a amateur I suppose. B)

They are extremely good movements made with very hard brass and steel. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Agree I have serviced / repaired many of these movements and they are really well made.  I just was expecting something better/unique. 

I'll see what I can do the next. I'm always looking for something different but not to difficult to keep the clock section interesting.

  • Like 1
Posted
On ‎27‎/‎03‎/‎2017 at 8:05 PM, oldhippy said:

I'll see what I can do the next. I'm always looking for something different but not to difficult to keep the clock section interesting.

I do enjoy your clock quiz's  oldhippy.  :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...