Jump to content

Pocket watch service "Chronometre IAXA"


Recommended Posts

I got this old movement quite cheap over ebay. The stem is broken and needs replacement. The watch is barely running when fully wound. There is a lot friction in the system.

The dial sais "CHRONOMETRE IAXA". There are no markings on the movement besides "Déposé" which seems to mean something like "patent pending". Not sure who made this movement. There are so many movements out on the market that it is very difficult to identify the caliber. It is not important anyway. This is just for practice.

 

IMG_1468.jpg

IMG_1451.jpg

IMG_1452.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next: escape wheel. Here too it proved to be a challenge to mount the escape wheel bridge. I found this to be more difficult compared to fine swiss watch movements, like the ETA 2472 or others I was working on. The bridge is too heavy to allow it to be placed gently. It took several approaches to get this job done.

IMG_1499.jpg

 

Finally got it done including the pallet lever with its bridge.

IMG_1501.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I then finished the dial side.

IMG_1508.jpg

IMG_1510.jpg

 

The movement is running quite well. It develops huge differences depending on the position. But the beat error is below 1ms. Amplitude is well above 220°.

I consider this a success. Too bad the stem is broken (got the movement like this).

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, AlexanderB said:

Next was the barrel bridge. I already mounted the barrel bridge but forgot to put the center wheel in place first. IMG_1491.jpg

 

Those marks on the edge of the barrel are telling me that the arbor is not or was not upright. It can happen by worn out bushings or if the barrel bridge is not placed back correctly. The edge of the barrel was sticking to the bridge cousing winding hard. This also explaining the marks on the crown wheel teeth and the broken stem. 

Excellent pictures and presentation ;)

Edited by szbalogh
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for pointing this out I completely missed that when I first looked at the photos, but once pointed out its very obvious.

Its tips like this on things to look out for that are very helpful for someone like me just starting out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you @szbalogh! That makes absolutely sense to me. I totally overlooked this important sign. This is why it makes sense to publish this on this forum. It would not have occurred to me. I'll keep that in mind.

I am now finished with it. Here is what the timegrapher told me

BEFORE (Dial down)
Beat error 0.7ms
Angle 135°
+320s/d

AFTER (Dial down)
Beat error 0.5ms
Angle 270°
+100s/d

Here are a few more pictures. Some of them are merely for the sake of taking the pictures. I love crawling inside the movement with my huge DSLR :)

 

IMG_1512.jpg

IMG_1516.jpg

IMG_1517.jpg

IMG_1520.jpg

IMG_1522.jpg

IMG_1524.jpg

IMG_1526.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have two Seitz sets, one ancient (with the 3mm anvils) and one just old (with 4mm anvils) plus a collection of spare pushers of assorted vintage. Not one of them is marked with it's size. Something which I have found very irritating when I have been using the tool and not returning pushers to their correct place in the tray every time as it means that I have to get the calipers out and measure them. These were bought as sets and collectively I have over 100 pushers so it would seem highly unlikely (if not inconceivable) that they are all cheap knock offs, especially as they are old enough to pre-date the prevalence of the Chinese knock off industry (at least as applied to watch making tools). I therefore believe them to be original Seitz parts. And there is no numbering. The shape of the bottom of the pump pushers is the same as your photo. The only thing that may not be the same is that the slotted insert (looks like a screw but is in fact a bayonet) should be brass. Yours looks the same colour as the steel but that could just be the lighting.
    • The original database is available on iOS devices here: https://apps.apple.com/fi/app/ranfft-watch-movements-archive/id6502008939
    • I no longer have my set so I can't help anymore sorry. Many on here have the set as its a must have tool for watch making/ repair.
    • It needs to be stirred before use and that makes it feel a lot thinner than when in the bottle. Does it feel as thin as 9010 after stirring it? I guess not! Yes, it's strange! I don't know, but if it is on impact it would make sense.
    • Thanks, OH! I agree with you. I'm currently looking at them under magnification, and they are consistent in shape and form for each section (flat pushers, pump pushers, concave, reamers, etc.). Though, a few are in bad condition and need to be replaced.  Before I cancel the return I have already initiated on eBay, can any of our members check to see if there are inconsistencies in markings on their sets? Also, I have included a snapshot of the bottom of one of the pump pushers, which are very unique in shape.  Can someone tell me if the bottoms of their pump pushers match this photo?  I'm hoping that Seitz had some inconsistencies in manufacturing over the years regarding markings.  Crossing my fingers. I appreciate you guys. Frank
×
×
  • Create New...