Jump to content

Rolex Timing Mechanism


Recommended Posts

Hi. Mark, I see you are up and looking over forum. First, really like appreciate quality and effort put into tutorials. In particular just watched three part series on rolex 3135 disassy, cleaning, reassy. My query/concern is for this fine design watch, surprised it appears, based on your tutorial, and my experience on similar women's rolex presidential datejust, there is no separate adjustment between beat and timing. From what I see, only available adjustment is to loosen plate holding balance down, move regulator which contains hairspring stud, then retighten. This can only modify beat, not timing, unless timing itself is adjusted by moving gold ring where upper balance jewel hold down spring is. The arm that moves holds the spring stud, so I fail to see how to adjust timing versus beat on this watch. Have searched internet and your tutorials exhaustively, do not see anything specific to regulating mechanisms on this type rolex. Any help or pointers to information with pictures of mechanisms involved would be greatly appreciated. I included a picture of balance regulator view.Thanks. Bill

IMG_0066.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all and thanks. Peter thanks for detailed information and pix. That explains why I didn't see more standard two arm adjustment on balance regulator, for beat and timing. Since Microstella seems to use self locking screws was probably designed this manner to ensure long term more accurate regulation versus using hook loop to impede hairspring length. Makes sense, just didn't expect it. But more I look at Rolex, least modern generation calibers, less common to rest of industry designs tools and parts have become. With good design and reliability reasons though. Thanks again everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Alex, welcome to the forum.

I had to edit your post since it was a redirection/link to a sales page. Sales and promotions are forbidden in our forum. We do want you to feel at home here so any questions about horology or sharing your experiences on the subject are highly encouraged and appreciated.

Cheers,

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
    • Yes, the arbor usually makes about 3 to 3.5 turns. But usually spring takes 2/3 to 3/4 of the free space in barrel, not 1/2, so take it for the calcullations. This way the change in torque is smaller. I have a picture for You, this one is little older, but no mater
    • I overhauled a ladies Rolex and noticed erratic performance so I stripped in down again and did fault finding. This is what I saw. The lower jewel (the one in the plate) is cracked and the hole is too big. Before discovering this, I stripped down and re-cleaned the main-plate (and parts) by hand with a fine natural fiber brush. I somehow missed the fault the first time and cannot understand how it was still running. Perhaps re-cleaning it dislodged some pieces of the jewel widening the hole? I don't know. Now I need to replace the jewel but don't have a Seitz tool. The Rolex part is 2130-0913 and the top and bottom are the same. The part comes complete in brass setting with KIF elastor spring and cap jewel. Note: I have never replaced a jewel. I do have a good vintage stacking set that I've used quite a bit.  Can I replace using a stacking set? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  
×
×
  • Create New...