Jump to content

Hair Spring Seems too Tight


Recommended Posts

Here is the situation. I have successfully repaired and cleaned a Seiko 6139A Pogue Chronograph watch and I can't seem to slow it down. I have now de - magnitized the watch and still I can't seem to slow it down enough. In regulating it, I actually need to push the beat over and tighten up the Hairspring to make sure it runs. This does not seem right. If I set the beat error to 2ms for example, there is not enough play to lengthen the Hairspring and thus slow the watch down. I have examined the Hairspring and still think it is a bit gummed up, even though I did clean it and de magnitize it. This watch was a disaster when I got it as I had use a drumel tool to remove mold from the rotor; for example. Should I be considering a new Hairspring? 3e7ddfca0443ccf38c54689a3b50193b.jpg

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would remove the hairspring and clean it again as you say you still think it is a bit gummed up even a very small amount of dirt and grime can make a huge difference to its performance. As side note are you sure you've locked the hairspring behind the regulator pin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have already suggested the hairspring may just need a clean, id remove the balance and let it soak for 2-3 minutes in some Renata Essence. I find some Seiko hairspring coils sit closer together than their Swiss counterparts so any debris no matter how small can throw things right off, they can be very very fussy ( i actually had same issue recently with a 6139 chrono and i had to clean the balance 3 times before she played ball ).

Also, if after cleaning the watch is still running fast i would verify the mainspring is correct and seated correctly, if it is the wrong spring i.e too strong, then this could be a cause :)

MrBeat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually need to push the beat over and tighten up the Hairspring to make sure it runs.

My experience with Seiko hairspring is that if the movement doesn't run or you have to push here and there, it is not a matter of cleaning or demagnetizing rather the hairsping is somehow distorted. Also if you do not have good amplitude and pattern you would be fighting windmills is trying to regulate it. Please post timegrapher pictures.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would remove the hairspring and clean it again as you say you still think it is a bit gummed up even a very small amount of dirt and grime can make a huge difference to its performance. As side note are you sure you've locked the hairspring behind the regulator pin.

Hairspring is locked into the regulator pin. I will give it another cleaning, in an ultrasonic cleaner

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check the hairspring collet is central when placed on the balance clock you'll have to remove it from the staff but the hairspring could be out of shape or twisted is it straight and not catching the clock anywhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cad101 said:

Check the hairspring collet is central when placed on the balance clock you'll have to remove it from the staff but the hairspring could be out of shape or twisted is it straight and not catching the clock anywhere.

The thing is, Seiko balances are not really made to be taken apart. It's a risky proposition.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check the hairspring collet is central when placed on the balance clock you'll have to remove it from the staff but the hairspring could be out of shape or twisted is it straight and not catching the clock anywhere.

Good advice my fellow guitar player, thanks.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting, but not very accurate, unfortunately. Using the word "Radiation" without specifying the specific type of radiation [what is being radiated] is one of the commonest mistakes - and most confusing to non-technical people.  Also, I believe the commonest lume in general use nowadays is just a phosphor compound that is "charged" be exposure to light? I've never personally see a watch with tritium lume, and it's not something I would particularly want as the decay is quite rapid with a half life around 12.5 years. Tritium is also of course radioactive, emitting beta particles, and it can possibly cause cancer if ingested!   Re. geiger counters, it's also important to note that many on internet sites are fakes that detect RF rather than, or as well as, ionising radiation. Or just low quality that likely only detect gamma, or gamma and alpha. Only high quality mica window GM tubes will detect beta; all the cheap geiger counters I can see on on ebay at present that show the tubes, use glass or quartz - despite claiming to detect beta   
    • Some things that we think of as relatively new or modern have been  around for a very long time. Alloy mainsprings, balance wheels and hairsprings and epilame for example were developed over 80 years ago. I use clear nail varnish for glueing crowns on, as well using it when making fibre bristle oilers and tweeking tools, its easy to apply if you get a move on after taking it out of the bottle and sets nice and hard.
    • Hi you will probably find there are a few citizen movements the same or close due to manufacturing processes.
    • Hello, How do I open a screw back cover on a hidden lug watch? It is perfectly round and rotates in the watch holder.   Thanks!
    • Where abouts north east chief ? 
×
×
  • Create New...