Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is my first post, so apologies if it's not quite right.

 

I found a Seiko 5 in the street a few months ago and handed it in as lost property. A few of days ago I received it as not claimed...cool, a free watch.

 

I set it and it has kept suprisingly good time since, losing only a few seconds in 3 or so days, quite acceptable, to me at least.

 

The only issue I have with it, and being a gift effectively I shouldn't really have any, is the dial is not aligned to the case.

The whole face seems to be a few degrees behins true.

I have opened the case, removed the movement and checked the dial feet, which I thought may have been damaged and the dial glue in place somehow, but the feet seem to be undamaged and held fast by retaining screws.

is this a simple fix, or would it cost more than the watch is worth to have rectified, after all it is something I can live with, as it gives the watch a certain quirkiness.

 

So any suggestions or recommendations are very much appreciated.

 

 

post-1835-0-78873700-1455844362_thumb.jp

Posted

What is strange is that that day and date are aligned with the window. Is it possible that movement (in fact the day ring) was replaced from a case with crown at 3, but someone rotated the movement ring to keep the day aligned. Day ring for crown at 4 is easily available.

Posted

I really don't know anything about it, but I have just ordered a hand removal tool, a set of drivers and some other tools...guess I have a new hobby :thumbsu:

Posted

In my experience with Seikos, it is the dial the one that is made for dates at 3 or 4, due to placement of dial feet. All other parts are the same for both instances. The only variation for the plastic ring is the height for when there is a chapter ring or a lower depth case well. In any case, I'll be waiting for developments on this watch and pictures...

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 

PS. Maybe it is the plastic ring that is positioned incorrectly in the movement...

Posted (edited)

Doesn't make sense to me.  The dial is misplaced around 6 deg (looking at the minute markers) anticlockwise which is less than the rotation between 3 & 4 which would be 30 deg.  If the stem fits normally at 4 clock then either the stem tube is out of position or the dial and movement is wrong for the case.  Only things I can think of is a bent stem (unlikely if its working ok) or the wrong case or wrong movement.  If the dial is incorrectly located then the window would be wrong re the date dial unless the date dial is wrong!   The movement/case combination is normally printed on the dial or stamped on the back.  I would check these out to see if the combination you have is correct.   Or, could it just be a bad fake!

Edited by canthus
Posted

This is what I'm thinking:

 

post-253-0-07344100-1455893599_thumb.jpg

 

This is an example of a movement ring and as you can see there are many places for the stem to find its way out of the movement but in most cases the ring fits in a certain way in the case. If the ring is positioned wrong but in such a way that everything else fits you get the rotation.

Posted

I think you have hit on the most feasible answer bobm12, which likely means someone has had it apart before, but a simple fix.

Posted

I think someone has played with it in the past. The dial says 21 jewels, but movement says 17 jewels.

I'm guessing something has been changed and incorrectly.

 

 

 

post-1835-0-18605200-1455894532_thumb.jp

post-1835-0-79846100-1455894571_thumb.jp

Posted

Then the dial does not belong to the watch, might have had its dial feet redone and badly so therefore the misalignment. Please, report back when you are able to check them closely...

Posted

Then the dial does not belong to the watch, might have had its dial feet redone and badly so therefore the misalignment. 

Now that I look better. Dial doesn't belong to watch and not to Seiko either. No P/N printing at 6, goofy 'J' and 's' in Jewels.

Posted

Now that I look better. Dial doesn't belong to watch and not to Seiko either. No P/N printing at 6, goofy 'J' and 's' in Jewels.

Agree. That looks like a redial. Certainly not a Seiko dial. I think the OP can find a nicer dial that work with the movement. 

Posted

i've been searching the net for a while now and I cannot find any reference to genuine Seiko 5 6309-8620, all the 6309s seem to be divers watches.

I have found a couple on nice dials that are designed the 6309 movement and a 4pm crown location, neither are for the 8620 case though, according to the numbers on the dials around the 6pm area.

will this be a problem, neither of the dials show the reverse, so I can't see the feet loactions.

Posted

i've been searching the net for a while now and I cannot find any reference to genuine Seiko 5 6309-8620, all the 6309s seem to be divers watches.

I have found a couple on nice dials that are designed the 6309 movement and a 4pm crown location, neither are for the 8620 case though, according to the numbers on the dials around the 6pm area.

will this be a problem, neither of the dials show the reverse, so I can't see the feet loactions.

 

Probably you can make the dial fit anyway. Question is, would be worth it? Watch is not original and not worth much before and it wouldn't be later. There are more funny ways to learn and tinker with Seiko parts, for example buy a lot or two from Ramon (thewatchcollector) on Ebay.

  • Like 1
Posted

Probably not a Feiko but definitely a Franken. Do you have a picture of the inside of the back?

When I proclaimed it a feiko, Tapatalk had only loaded one of the pics in post #9. The missing pic was of the movement which shows a 6309.

I hereby retract "feiko" but maintain "franken".

Please read the above with a suitable trumpet fanfare playing in the background [emoji16]

Oh, and the crown is not the correct one. I think it shouldn't protrude from the case.

  • Like 2
Posted

My guess is that the case is a 6119 and the movement and dial is from a 6309 . The 6119 has a quick change function. That is why the crown protrude  a little from the case. And the 6119 has the crown a little higher then the 6309 case . That is why the movement and dial isn't align? It is a franken seiko watch.

Posted

some of the seikos have the crown at 3:45 instead of 4:00. it escapes me which movements these are. this might be the simple case of a 4 o'clock movement placed into a 3:45 case. it will fit but i will be off by a few degrees.

Posted (edited)

Now that I look better. Dial doesn't belong to watch and not to Seiko either. No P/N printing at 6, goofy 'J' and 's' in Jewels.

i can just about guarantee this is an "india" special. it has all of the telltale signs.

you probably don't have an 8620 case, just the caseback.

Edited by ramrod
Posted

I, with practically no experience of these things bow to all your suggestions.

I think it is an "India" special...I have found the following on ebay, it's from India and has the same "Funky" J & S in Jewels.

 

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/VINTAGE-SEIKO-5-AUTOMATIC-JAPAN-MENS-DAY-DATE-WATCH-lot586-a8170-/231854902136?hash=item35fba10b78:g:4BcAAOSwG-1WzJ3U

 

Remarkably, the watch is still running very acurately and seems to be less than 10 seconds out after a week.

 

I might just be tempted to buy one or two of these Indian Seikos/Franken watches, they generally seem to look pretty good and if the one I have is anything to go by, are accurate enough for me. And cheaper than an Argos wear it and bin it fashion watch.

Posted

hi Jumboslim,

yes, it is a franken watch, but so what!

it was free and it keeps great time!

there are a number of epray sellers that put junk movements and junk cases together to make frankens and they are JUNK!

you got a good one!

enjoy and don't sweat the misalignment.

proudly make that watch your avatar here.

it is a great site with great people. stick around.

attached is a pic of my seikos.

todd

post-807-0-87611800-1456274309_thumb.jpg

Posted (edited)

P.S.

please don't buy from them.

they are crooks, selling crap to unsuspecting people. don't encourage them with your hard earned money.

if you want another Seiko 5 i will send you one for the cost of shipping. 

i used to collect seikos,

but now i am a pocket watch guy. 

but you can't have this one! I love it!

todd

post-807-0-90480800-1456275608_thumb.jpg

Edited by dalarry
  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
    • I found a motor that is 3/4 hp and another that is 1.2hp. They come with speed controller. So I don’t think I would need a wiring diagram. But I sure appreciate you offering your help! Do you think 1.2 hp would be too much for a watchmaker’s lathe?
×
×
  • Create New...