Jump to content

Copy Stand For Macro Photography


WillFly

Recommended Posts

Having equipped myself with a couple of Canon 70D bodies and lenses, I tested out using my old Pentax Super Takumar 52mm lens with x1, x2 & 3x converter rings for macro photography of watch faces and movements. The lens, plus x2 converter, seems very good indeed, but the problem has been finding the right height for accurate focussing as the tolerance is quite tight.

 

Anyway, I spotted a £44 copy stand on eBay the other day and bought it (brand new) from a computer/electronics firm in Kent. It came this morning and, for the price, is very good, robust and well made. Picture enclosed. Watch pics to follow!

 

post-64-0-48063200-1449662320_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is what i should need. I am a bad photographer. Have a nice watch but can't really use all the function. That is why i don't take any pictures when i service something. But with that i can have the camera focused on the object and maybe even a nice lamp on the stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick post on some preliminary results. Picture 1 is of the face of my Elgin "Father Time" RR pocket watch - 52mm Super Takumar lens with a x2 converter ring. This was done hastily and the focus isn't quite sharp - my fault, not the lens!

 

Picture 2 is part of the movement - Super Takumar 52mm lens with x3 converter. Shot in raw and processed with LightRoom.

 

post-64-0-37037700-1449668767_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-12465600-1449668784_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Bob - always good to get feedback. One of the problems of focus with a manual lens is that the viewfinder view isn't always possible. So I'm using the "screen view" - i.e. the touch sensitive screen on the Canon which folds round to act as a monitor. And because the lens is manual, the autofocus doesn't function, meaning that the focus ring has to be adjusted quite delicately and accurately.

 

I also forgot to turn off image stabilisation - which is always turned off when using a tripod or stand! I set the shutter drive to a 2 seconds timer to lessen any camera shake when taking the pic.

 

The camera mode is set to "Aperture Priority", which means that the lens speed is automatically adjusted. I set the ISO to 200 as I wanted as little "noise" (grain") as possible within the light tolerance (I used f11 to give some depth of field). No artificial light here - just daylight from a window by the table. I might invest in a good LED source or two.

 

And down the path of yet more kit we inevitably dribble...

:D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW! that second picture is pin sharp. beautiful.

that mount is a very good idea. my watch photography is something to be desired. i got the basics and haven't seemed to move past it.

one thing i can recommend, will, is to use manual focus rather than auto in such a tight spot. perhaps you are already doing that. i use an old manual canon lens (50mm 1.4) from the FD days and mounted it on an adapter to fit my newer EF canon camera. i got adapter rings for the old lens and have mounted magnifying lenses to it.

it's all manual adjustments because the depth of field it so shallow.

with a setup like you have i would stop it all the way to F22 and set my shutter speed to about 8 seconds in a darkened room. i've found that my focus is a lot better doing it that way.

wow, what i could do with that setup. hey - it only takes money.

 

apologies - i see you're using a manual lens already. i must have done some speed reading on your post.

Edited by ramrod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having equipped myself with a couple of Canon 70D bodies and lenses, I tested out using my old Pentax Super Takumar 52mm lens with x1, x2 & 3x converter rings for macro photography of watch faces and movements. The lens, plus x2 converter, seems very good indeed, but the problem has been finding the right height for accurate focussing as the tolerance is quite tight.

 

Anyway, I spotted a £44 copy stand on eBay the other day and bought it (brand new) from a computer/electronics firm in Kent. It came this morning and, for the price, is very good, robust and well made. Picture enclosed. Watch pics to follow!

 

attachicon.gifCopy stand.jpg

Looks good Will, in your option would it support a SLR (Nikon D7000) or would it be too much. I have been looking at ways to improve the pics for the forum & using a tripod is not good it just gets in the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks good Will, in your option would it support a SLR (Nikon D7000) or would it be too much. I have been looking at ways to improve the pics for the forum & using a tripod is not good it just gets in the way.

I can't see any problem in using a Nikon - the mount is a simple screw and knurled wheel, and I assume the Nikon has the usual screw-threaded hole in the base. If not, you might need some kind of adapter.

 

How far you have to move up or down, use manual or auto focus, etc., will depend on the lens you use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see any problem in using a Nikon - the mount is a simple screw and knurled wheel, and I assume the Nikon has the usual screw-threaded hole in the base. If not, you might need some kind of adapter.

 

How far you have to move up or down, use manual or auto focus, etc., will depend on the lens you use.

Thanks Will I will have a look as I can tether the Nikon to my MacBook Pro so this will make life easier.

PS what was the shops name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought the smaller version of this (CS305) some time ago mainly for document copying and portability and it really is excellent, but I think I should probably have got this larger version to make it more adaptable. The CS305 is fine for compacts but is not really high or strong enough to support a camera with lens. Looks like I'll have to get another :D .

 

Stephen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I only buy mechanical personally, as it's all that interests me. There are a few electronic movements I find interesting, but they're not the sort I tend to see very often at all, and wouldn't come up in any of my searches. I have been given a few quartz watches over the years, but they all just sit in a bag in a drawer. Once I hit some critical mass, I'll hopefully get enough motivation to either sell or donate them.
    • Welcome to the forum. I was just in London this past weekend... great weather. I hope you also enjoyed it.
    • I'm surprised you say that.  I'd say that IF (!!) barrel diameter, beat rate and all other things are equal, the length is directly correlated with the power reserve.  A random/quick google search found me this quote from Longines "The length of the mainspring directly correlates with the amount of power reserve a watch has. The longer the spring, the longer the power reserve or also the reduction of the vibration, i.e. from 28’800 A/h to 25’200 A/h. (less vibration, less energy needed)." (https://www.longines.com/en-za/universe/blog/what-is-power-reserve-on-a-watch) A few anecdotal experience on my side would also lead to that conclusion. Then, of course, it depends what you mean by "verry small". In the particular case with an original MS of 300mm, going to 280mm, I'd expect losing maybe 2h of power reserve. Just a "guesstimate". 
    • Actually one would not claim such thing  about the power reserve without check to confirm this, but if any difference, it will be verry small.
    • Another question if I may. When you guys buy watch lots are you buying a mix of mechanical and quartz as well? Most of the job lots I am finding (all overseas) are a mix. If they are all mechanical, it is generally just movements with no cases. I am not at the point where I can identify movements by just viewing them so I'm not inclined to buy a bunch of stuff which will just end up lying around. Is anyone able to successfully move any of the watches they save on to someone else? I can't see a viable market in Australia for refurbished watches. Most people I have seen at work only have a watch if it counts their steps, answers their phone and makes the coffee. I'll admit it, I have a super cheap smartwatch on my wrist. Will I buy another one when it quits? Doubt it. I don't know if I would even bother with a pedometer. Heart rate? And do what with all the data? Blood pressure? Never been right since I got the watch. Sleep? If I can't work out that I'm not getting enough, I need to have a serious talk with myself. I think I'll go back to my Seiko and just make myself stay active.
×
×
  • Create New...