Jump to content

To B(ezel) or not to B(ezel)


Recommended Posts

I picked up this Omega Seamaster 166.003 (1969) many months ago. It was less than $300 US as a non-runner, but the only thing that seems to be wrong with it (other than enough dirt in the case to start a garden) is a broken main spring and missing bezel. The spring is on my latest Cousins' order but the bezel is as elusive as an albino, left-handed unicorn. Apparently these being very thin have a tendency to break and any NOS is already sold. And, of course, the Omega part is discontinued. 

The dilemma I face, at least internally, is do I leave sans bezel, or do I fudge a not-quite replacement bezel? Everything else seems to be original, or at least authentic Omega parts including the signed crown and crystal with the little Ω in the center. I have a couple of vintage Seiko bezels that with a little tweaking would probably fit. On one hand I'd like the watch to look finished (I'll be keeping and wearing it) but I also don't know if I'm 100% okay with a frankenbezel.

Assuming I can't find an original replacement (And I've no desire to buy a donor at 3X the price just for the bezel) What would you do?

 

 

2021_0111_160917_006.JPG

2021_0111_160932_007.JPG

2021_0111_161103_008.JPG

2021_0111_161134_010.JPG

2021_0111_161150_011.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eccentric59 said:

I picked up this Omega Seamaster 166.003 (1969) many months ago. It was less than $300 US as a non-runner, but the only thing that seems to be wrong with it (other than enough dirt in the case to start a garden) is a broken main spring and missing bezel. The spring is on my latest Cousins' order but the bezel is as elusive as an albino, left-handed unicorn. Apparently these being very thin have a tendency to break and any NOS is already sold. And, of course, the Omega part is discontinued. 

The dilemma I face, at least internally, is do I leave sans bezel, or do I fudge a not-quite replacement bezel? Everything else seems to be original, or at least authentic Omega parts including the signed crown and crystal with the little Ω in the center. I have a couple of vintage Seiko bezels that with a little tweaking would probably fit. On one hand I'd like the watch to look finished (I'll be keeping and wearing it) but I also don't know if I'm 100% okay with a frankenbezel.

Assuming I can't find an original replacement (And I've no desire to buy a donor at 3X the price just for the bezel) What would you do?

 

 

2021_0111_160917_006.JPG

2021_0111_160932_007.JPG

2021_0111_161103_008.JPG

2021_0111_161134_010.JPG

2021_0111_161150_011.JPG

Originality is important to the best of us but how long you will be waiting and how much you might spend is unknown. All the while you could be wearing this with what would be a good looking match that only you will know is not genuine.  As long as no alteration is made to the case you can both have it on your wrist and continue to search for the correct bezel. Just think of it as a temporary fixture.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, oldhippy said:

No chance of a complete case.

After a year+ of looking that is my conclusion, barring someone stumbling upon a stockpile of vintage 1960's Omega parts in an abandoned warehouse somewhere.

6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

and continue to search for the correct bezel.

I do keep my eyes open, but even used markets are selling this model without the bezel.

 

So this brings me to a more philosophical question. When does a watch become a franken? Replacing a mainspring or crystal doesn't. Replacing a screw or spring not from the OEM shouldn't. What about a crown? Balance? Third wheel?

 

If I modify a Seiko bezel to fit (which is my intention -- and will post pictures when that happens) or if I contract a jeweler to make a replica of the original part, I know purists will cringe, but I don't really see the loss of value in preserving the aesthetic.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The movement service was a success. Main spring was all it needed and now it runs +4 sec, 240°-ish amplitude and a positional beat error delta of 0.2. I also decided to use the Seiko bezel (if and when I can ever find a genuine replacement between doomsday and half-past never). Final results.

DSC_0003.thumb.JPG.d17f9efc1dc2ba807746620bc115ef45.JPG

DSC_0006.thumb.JPG.45c2108ed5ab8313ac34b0c8514420db.JPG

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
×
×
  • Create New...