Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 9/21/2023 at 6:17 AM, Waggy said:
Expand  

I thought Cartier signed one of the numerals as well  ? Anyway that movement is pretty darn rough

  On 9/21/2023 at 8:34 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

I thought Cartier signed one of the numerals as well  ? Anyway that movement is pretty darn rough

Expand  

No its pretty all darn rough. The tanks I've  ever looked had the backs screwed down.

Posted (edited)

Cartier is my thing. - well one of my things anyway.

You're okay with that.

1970's movement - Cartier has been fairly nomadic over the years with who they commissioned to supply their movements.

That's a 1970's women's tank movement made by - I want to say MST but not totally sure. These days they're all made by sellita but they've been round the houses over the years with different ebauche makers.

Couple of examples of the same movement below.

 

 

wqqwqw.jpg

s-l225.jpg

Edited by 316lad
Posted

While Cartier did use ETA 2512 movements in some watches, the only gold plated cases I know of are from the "Must" collection, which were gold plated silver. These have "Must de Cartier" on the dial, and usually the back, and usually say "argent" on the back, with a hallmark, and the word Vermeil, and "plaque' or 20 microns" or similar. I'm quite sure that they didn't do any other plated cases. Could be wrong, but this one looks fishy to me, poor engraving and dial quality too.

Posted
  On 9/22/2023 at 3:05 PM, 316lad said:

Cartier is my thing. - well one of my things anyway.

You're okay with that.

1970's movement - Cartier has been fairly nomadic over the years with who they commissioned to supply their movements.

That's a 1970's women's tank movement made by - I want to say MST but not totally sure. These days they're all made by sellita but they've been round the houses over the years with different ebauche makers.

Couple of examples of the same movement below.

 

 

wqqwqw.jpg

s-l225.jpg

Expand  

A serial number on the caseback would be lovely to see.

Posted
  On 9/22/2023 at 3:18 PM, nickelsilver said:

While Cartier did use ETA 2512 movements in some watches, the only gold plated cases I know of are from the "Must" collection, which were gold plated silver. These have "Must de Cartier" on the dial, and usually the back, and usually say "argent" on the back, with a hallmark, and the word Vermeil, and "plaque' or 20 microns" or similar. I'm quite sure that they didn't do any other plated cases. Could be wrong, but this one looks fishy to me, poor engraving and dial quality too.

Expand  

Plated silver or gold doesn't have hallmarks. 

Posted (edited)
  On 9/22/2023 at 5:06 PM, RichardHarris123 said:

Are you @316ladsaying that it's genuine ?

Expand  

I'll stick my neck out here and say yes, I do.

The dial's a bit iffy but the rest is fine. Not a great era for Cartier - the early 70's - has to be said. Gold/ silver plating (why not solid), etc.

The OP expresses scepticism about the authenticity because one of the numerals isn't signed - usually the "7" as they are these days. Cartier didn't start doing that until about 2004. This is a '70's watch.

That's a bit like someone expressing the same doubt about a Rolex Sub from the '80's - because it doesn't have the laser etched crown on the crystal or the engraving and the serial number on the rehaut.

As I say - it was a low point for Cartier horologically - the early '70's, until they got their mojo back in the early '80's and started producing the iconic re-issue of the SS and gold Santos, etc, and then they were elevated back to where they belong; Watch as pure, beautiful jewellery. Interesting brand over the years.

 

Got a women's Santos on the bench at the moment - you can see the "7" hasn't the vertical Cartier - and this is from 1993.

Nice watch - has seen some abuse. Always tricky to gauge what the customer expects me to do  in terms of Resto. Probably best just to polish it up a bit - you can - the gold bezel IS solid Gold - as are the screws on the bracelet.

So, you see within 15/ 20 years of making the OP's ebay watch - Cartier had got their sh1t back together.

Still a bit of a rubbish movement though - ETA by this time.

IMG_0519.jpg

IMG_1494.jpeg

Edited by 316lad
  • Like 1
Posted

I looked around a bit for a similar case. Anyone find another example of the 18k gold ‘electroplated’…I guess snap-back case, with crude edges in the corners…apparently from the 70s?

Posted (edited)
  On 9/22/2023 at 6:45 PM, 316lad said:

The edges aern't "Crude" they're time worn down.

Take a look at a slightly better example:

https://vintagewatchoutlet.com/products/cartier-tank-manual-wind-18k-gold-electroplated-vintage-1970s-mens-watch-23mm-1

 

Expand  

Where’s the photo of the back of that watch- or any Carrier tank with an ‘electroplated’ snap back case. I’ve never seen one like that before. If the watch in question is definitively from the 70s there should be pictures of others out there…

now I see the other photos, yes…

Edited by rehajm
Posted (edited)
  On 9/22/2023 at 6:52 PM, rehajm said:

Where’s the photo of the back of that watch?

Expand  

Flick through the photos.

Rough old thing isn't it.

As I say - it was a low spot for Cartier.

You can see the concept though.

efgeger.jpg

Edited by 316lad
Posted
  On 9/22/2023 at 6:45 PM, 316lad said:

 

The edges aern't "Crude" they're time worn down

 

Expand  

well, yes. it is similar to the watch in better condition- but both are certainly more crude than the usual design….and worn down bad enough to be that rough but haven't worn through the plating, as has happened on the front corners?

Yowza- imma pass and let someone else enjoy the deal on this one…

Posted (edited)
  On 9/22/2023 at 7:02 PM, rehajm said:

well, yes. it is similar to the watch in better condition- but both are certainly more crude than the usual design….and worn down bad enough to be that rough but haven't worn through the plating, as has happened on the front corners?

Yowza- imma pass and let someone else enjoy the deal on this one…

Expand  

I think that's a good move but not necessarily because of your scpeticism about it being a fake.

It represents a "dud" period in Cartier horology. Collectors aern't interested in this stuff - neither does it particularly grab the eye - design or build-wise.

If the OP has thoughts about doing some Resto and selling it on - I'd pitch my bid at no more than £500 - though I suspect it will go for far more than that. But that doesn't make it validated.

I adore Cartier - but I wouldn't bother with it - it's representational of dark days - Quartz Crisis was blowing a Hooley, nobody knew what to do, marketing people flapping about, etc. It has nothing to mitigate it's "cheapness" and oppotunism in a dynamically changing Swiss watchmaking industry in crisis.

And Cheap - was never a Cartier selling point anyway.

It would be a pass from me too.

Edited by 316lad
  • Like 2
Posted
  On 9/22/2023 at 7:01 PM, 316lad said:

I'm sorry - I can't teach you how to surf the Internet.

Expand  

I was willing to listen to your opinion because I have read that Cartier produced some pretty average watches in the past.  But please don't question my intelligence, the link you provided only had on photo. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
  On 9/22/2023 at 7:20 PM, RichardHarris123 said:

I was willing to listen to your opinion because I have read that Cartier produced some pretty average watches in the past.  But please don't question my intelligence, the link you provided only had on photo. 

Expand  

I'm so sorry if you thought I was - I was questioning my own ability to teach with my own limited intelligence.

Posted

…and to clarify, I wasn’t questioning anyone here either. I’m hunting for a tank, an old one, and was educated by second and third gen watch shop owners on what to look for. Clearly this one misses a lot of the usual Cartier boxes…

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 9/22/2023 at 5:06 PM, RichardHarris123 said:

Are you @316ladsaying that it's genuine ?

Expand  

The question is what is genuine?  Cartier is essentially known for designing and making jewellery so Cartier didn't make the movement. Cartier cases have serial numbers, there is no serial number so they didn't make the case, and their cases are held together by screws. If they employed another company to make the case , did someone else also make the dial. At best Cartier commissioned someone to make it, so its not really Cartier. There are a few examples on ebay the same as this, not sure if we can use that as evidence for it not to be fake unless we are suggesting only one fake has been made. Surely the Cartier tank is in the top list for most copied and faked watch of all time. Understandably i cant figure out why a world renowned Jeweller would put their name to this.

 

  On 9/22/2023 at 6:52 PM, rehajm said:

Where’s the photo of the back of that watch- or any Carrier tank with an ‘electroplated’ snap back case. I’ve never seen one like that before. If the watch in question is definitively from the 70s there should be pictures of others out there…

now I see the other photos, yes…

Expand  

 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 9/22/2023 at 7:21 PM, 316lad said:

I'm so sorry if you thought I was - I was questioning my own ability to teach with my own limited intelligence.

Expand  

This is a friendly site, every one pitches in and helps each other.  The advanced members must sometimes roll their eyes at the questions we amateurs ask but they do their best. 

I have not come across such a arrogant member as yourself on here before and hopefully I won't do again.  

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Depending upon how vintage it is there is no technical documentation to benefit from and very likely never was. Interesting comparison of ? So you're comparing a school and A association with classes to specific technical documentation specifically for specific watches or other documentation? I'm not quite sure how you would actually make that kind of a comparison On the other hand maybe it's because something is missing in your quote Oh other things that are missing from service manuals would be a lot of the early manuals when they were scanned PDFs were specifically scanned for parts only. So a lot of so-called service manuals have no servicing because it was not scanned. Evolution of technical service documentation is quite interesting. It also depends upon the particular company. Some companies the technical documentation is very poor because they assume you're skilled watchmaker you don't need technical documentation. Or maybe they only have aspects of some specific watch and nothing else. Then one of the problems we have in this discussion is if you've never seen what you're missing then you would not know and you might even perceived by not knowing that you're better off without it? For instance many years ago I purchased a watchmaker's estate. In there was omega technical documentation because he ran a jewelry store that sold Omega watches. So there's a few technical documents not overly impressive because Omega assumed your watchmaker and they don't have to give you a detailed about anything. typically the servicing would only cover interesting things and just general suggestions on lubrication. But what I was going to the documentation I found something interesting especially because involved lubrication which I find interesting. I've attached it is a PDF as you can see it covers oiling Omega and of course cleaning because you have to have a clean watch to oil it. I think this was my first exposure to supplemental information as I will call it not found in the general instructions. Oh and pay attention to the lubrication for the keyless I really don't understand why the Swiss goes so insanely lite for lubrication there. Evolution of documentation now cousins has working instructions the cover mostly generic general stuff there is a few specific calibers referred to in the working instruction but mainly it's just general stuff. Before cousins lost access they did obtain a few of the working instructions found at the link below. https://www.cousinsuk.com/document/search?SearchString=Working Here is an example of what happens if you're missing something? Omega also has general instructions for groupings of calibers work covers specific things related to that caliber. This information a course is not found in the general service documents if they even had general service documents a lot of times they do not they just have a parts list. So the specifically covering things that you really need to know and if you don't have this well? For instance there is an older discussion from 2018 but a couple weeks ago it came to life. Somebody was having a problem they fix the problem there very happy at least for now because the problem will come back as they haven't fixed the problem at all. If they had read the general instruction which they did not because they do not have access to it they would discover that putting the hands on his critical how you are supposed to do it because of you don't do it the way you're supposed to the end up with the exact problem you have here a damaged sweep pinion.     Oiling Omega watches 1957.PDF
    • Sorry, no - these are the real model 987801; stainless steel with a white and blue (or black?) dial: https://www.chrono24.co.uk/cartier/ref-987901.htm  
    • Though I mostly do vintage I can’t say I’ve benefitted greatly from any company’s technical documents. Is anything in them infinitely superior to WOSTEP or AWCI? Maybe knowing details of purple winding gears and I guess epilame on all those other parts is fun…I still pull them and read when I can fine them I suppose 🧐…
    • One of the blessings of being an enthusiast is that I can spend whatever time I need on a watch to make it work as well as I can. Before I take on anyone's watch, I always tell them that I can't promise anything about how long it may take and what costs it might bring. Of course, any additional costs must be agreed upon. As you indicate, it's only when you're done that you know for a fact what time was required and the cost. It's the same pattern as with any complex undertaking, and repairing watches can be complex, even very complex. No, far from it. The secrecy from the big brands is honestly one of the most frustrating parts of this hobby. Even when you do manage to get hold of service manuals, they’re often missing crucial details—things like lubrication points or even just the safest way to disassemble and assemble certain components. Luckily, WRT exist, and over time you build up the knowledge and experience to work around the gaps. Sharing tips and hard-earned tricks here makes a huge difference. The secrecy itself seems to be part of the business model. Take the Rolex 3135 as an example—rather than clearly explaining how to safely remove the date ring in publicly available documentation, Rolex sells pricey training programs and certifications to their authorised service centres. And who ends up paying for that in the end? The customers, because independent watchmakers and passionate amateurs are pushed out. It’s a shame, really. If the car industry operated like this, the backlash would be huge.
    • Provided the tool is in good condition, and hasn’t been subject to dodgy repairs (some I’ve seen on eBay are in terrible condition or were incompetently repaired) the balance arms are clamped very securely when performing adjustments and the relevant surfaces are true.  This is an excellent tool in my experience.  Here’s a picture of a balance clamped securely, ready for an adjustment to be made : Best Regards, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...