Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

It takes a while to get the teeth off

Tell me about it 😮

Spent whole day and I'm only halfway. So far I've been using coarse emery-paper (#80) and a #400 grit diamond hone. Since I have a thin file, the risk with mechanical grinding is that you may heat the file (locally) over its tempering / annealing temperature, something I like to avoid.

Nice job for the weekend 😬

 

Edited by Endeavor
Posted

To conclude my last project; on the picture it all comes nicely together; the monitor-arm for the microscope and the belt-driven Jacot tool.

The microscope is equipped with the original 1:1 lens (7x-45x magnification) which gives, positioned above the jacot tool, the perfect working height.

Initial test, everything works a treat 🙃

IMG_2900.thumb.jpeg.f267a43e6e9e7c32b7649cb844f422f4.jpeg

  • Like 8
Posted
10 hours ago, Endeavor said:

To conclude my last project; on the picture it all comes nicely together; the monitor-arm for the microscope and the belt-driven Jacot tool.

The microscope is equipped with the original 1:1 lens (7x-45x magnification) which gives, positioned above the jacot tool, the perfect working height.

Initial test, everything works a treat 🙃

IMG_2900.thumb.jpeg.f267a43e6e9e7c32b7649cb844f422f4.jpeg

Looks cosy and way more tidy than mine at the moment plus neat idea for spare laminate flooring for a desk top👍

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Endeavor said:

Initial test, everything works a treat 🙃

Looks fantastic and I especially enjoy the wall clock! 👍

Warning OT, but I hope I may be excused!

Well, I don't have a belt-driven Jacot tool, so for now, I will just have to settle with my extendable Yoyo keyring, but it works well enough for me so I'm certainly not complaining. Had my wife record a Youtube short video while I was working on restoring a centre wheel. I really appreciate the Jacot. Without it, many fine vintage watches would not get a second life.

 

 

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 3
Posted
9 hours ago, oldhippy said:

There was me thinking you had sunglasses on while watchmaking

One can't have enough light, and as you can see, I've plenty 🙂

 

7 hours ago, VWatchie said:

I especially enjoy the wall clock!

A hourly reminder 🙂 👍

Took me some time to get the ticking sound down; weaker mainspring, adjustment of the Geneva-stop, isolation inside the movement compartment, and especially from the back since the bell-shape outer-ring acts like an amplifier. Currently one can hardly hear it anymore; wife happy 🥳

 

8 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

neat idea for spare laminate flooring for a desk top

It's linoleum with wood print, leftover pieces from our kitchen flooring. Easy to replace once damaged, as I use the table for all sorts of hobby-activities.

  • Like 3
  • 7 months later...
Posted (edited)

It's not until now that I started practicing the motor driven Jacot tool. So far, I'm very pleased with the progress and the workings of my "design" / setup.

IMG_3329.thumb.jpeg.f81767be1bef6a4607a7117b1c20bcb4.jpeg

Here my first attempt with a balance pivot in a size 11/100 Lantern.

It's all very tiny and I need the microscope to be able to see what I'm doing. And yes, I'm left handed 🙂

IMG_3330.thumb.jpeg.3dc440c37bb3739c6bd0e7172bc62a79.jpeg

IMG_3355.thumb.jpeg.0c25e11d6d637f5dd25c7cbe8ee78d37.jpeg

Here the foot-switch, on the floor underneath the table. It would have been nice with a bigger switch-area and a heavier unit, but I had this "end-switch" on hand and it works 😉

IMG_3357.thumb.jpeg.3c8c19713a2672dc6b56f19300f9e1fb.jpeg

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 5
Posted

Why motor driven. Can't you manage using a bow and find it difficult or is it to speed up your work which I do not recommend as you do not have control as you would with a bow.   

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Why motor driven.

With all respect, but in modern times cars do have engines complete with full control too. I wanted to proceed 🙂

flintstone_car.thumb.jpg.332ce345cb44816ede64e9049889b41b.jpg

Edited by Endeavor
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Endeavor said:

It's not until now that I started practicing the motor driven Jacot tool. So far, I'm very pleased with the progress and the workings of my "design" / setup.

IMG_3329.thumb.jpeg.f81767be1bef6a4607a7117b1c20bcb4.jpeg

Here my first attempt with a balance pivot in a size 11/100 Lantern.

It's all very tiny and I need the microscope to be able to see what I'm doing. And yes, I'm left handed 🙂

IMG_3330.thumb.jpeg.3dc440c37bb3739c6bd0e7172bc62a79.jpeg

IMG_3355.thumb.jpeg.0c25e11d6d637f5dd25c7cbe8ee78d37.jpeg

Here the foot-switch, on the floor underneath the table. It would have been nice with a bigger switch-area and a heavier unit, but I had this "end-switch" on hand and it works 😉

IMG_3357.thumb.jpeg.3c8c19713a2672dc6b56f19300f9e1fb.jpeg

I tried this with a using a dremel for a drive  motor. Its not quite so much fun polishing a pivot in a runner bed. Speed needs to very slow and concentration high. 

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Are you saying it has a cut off switch?

Yes, it has seamless adjustable speed control (2nd picture, the black round knob on top of the control/drive unit) and an instant cut-off by means of a foot-switch; 4th picture 😉

 

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
Posted

I've broken two pivots when I got out of sync - I wasn't holding the pivot down hard enough in the slot and the balance jumped out. I'm not sure how I'd manage with a motor driven tool 😟

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I've broken two pivots when I got out of sync - I wasn't holding the pivot down hard enough in the slot and the balance jumped out. I'm not sure how I'd manage with a motor driven tool 😟

Full concentration needed and a low running speed, my first attempt flipped the balance across my bench. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I tried this with a using a dremel for a drive  motor. Its not quite so much fun polishing a pivot in a runner bed. Speed needs to very slow and concentration high. 

it appears to be that the speed is controllable and are you suggesting that he doesn't have enough concentration?

 

4 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I've broken two pivots when I got out of sync - I wasn't holding the pivot down hard enough in the slot and the balance jumped out. I'm not sure how I'd manage with a motor driven tool 

just think he would have both hands free versus one hand tied up with the bow I wonder if that would make any difference at all? Then I imagine the belt when you stop stops really fast it doesn't just continue to run totally out of control. I believe he said he had a on-off switch switch should be really fast turning on and off probably much faster than somebody trying to run both hands at the same time.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

it appears to be that the speed is controllable and are you suggesting that he doesn't have enough concentration?

Just offering advice that when he tries polishing the pivot in a runner bed the concentration needed to be more and the motor speed slower than when shaping the pivot end. Its not as easy and is less fun ( or more fun depending on your interpretation of fun ). 

Posted
1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Its not as easy and is less fun ( or more fun depending on your interpretation of fun ).

the problem is there's lots of variables here and it looks like he's handled the speed control nicely and I don't know about your setup whether you had the same control of speed situation etc. but it does seem interesting of that newfangled technology should not be used with old technology because it goes against the beliefs. If you want to see some fun find traditional watchmakers and start talking about CNC and they get really cranky fast they do not embrace modern technology and I have to wonder if that's what's happening here the inability to accept there might be a better way perhaps. Remember when this tool was invented that probably didn't even have electricity. So if they did have electricity would they have done it differently or would they make us use the bow because they like torturing us?

Then how easy is it really to learn how to use this tool? Whether using a belt or the bow or something else is this really an easy tool to use?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I wasn't holding the pivot down hard enough

Of course, I can not talk about "long time experience" (I've just started), but from what I've observed is that if you don't keep the file flat on the runners-bed, the pivot has room to "escape; it rolls itself "out of bed" (😄 ) This hasn't anything to do with how hard you press down, the pivot has no mass, friction or power enough to push the file upwards.

Because my tool is belt-driven, next to having my both hands free, I can fully concentrate on the file and the pivot, which coincidentally are the two most important parts in this exercise.  If needed, I can support the hand holding the file with the other hand, or, with the other hand hold (additionally) the tip of the file for better control of the files angle. Also, IMHO, one doesn't need huge strokes with the file. In reality and under the microscope, a 1 cm stroke is already huge compared to the size of the pivot.

Also, having belt-driven, I can position the microscope right above the Jacot tool and have a good view of "what's happening". I've experienced too that the pivot nearly rolled "out of bed" (due to the "incorrect" position of the file), but since I had only one thing to concentrate & to focus on, I could stop immediately to prevent worse. I guess my brain doesn't like multi-tasking, hence having the Jacot tool belt-driven is for me the solution.

Of course, if the bow driving works for other people, perfect !

Two personal remarks I like to make, or better; "food for thought";

1) It seems to me that when trying the bow, the hand holding the file mimics the movement of the hand holding the bow, but obviously in the opposite direction. My file strokes were way too long, causing the file to "wobble", tilting off the beds horizontal plane and thereby giving the pivot room to "escape". Nickelsilver's video showed how he controls the stoke-length and the position of the file, a method initially unknown to me. Since I now can fully concentrate on the file and the pivot (the rest is taken care of), that problem is solved.

2) When I was into old Land Rovers, I took an off-roading coarse in the Belgium Ardennes, conducted by a man who participated multiple times in the Paris-Dakar rally. He made a remark which always stayed with me: "When you go too fast, unwanted things start you to overcome".

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi All. I would appreciate some advice for a complete newbie on getting into watch servicing - nothing serious,  just as a fun project. I've got a thing for hand-wound watches and would like to bring an old watch (or two) back to life, so looking to learn to do a strip-clean-oil-assemble cycle.   I've toyed with this idea in the past (years ago) and picked up a couple candidates to learn on, but never found the time for them.  One is an old Ingersoll, swiss-made 17 jewels. It seems to wind and tick. Casing, dial, glass are in great shape, so looks like a good candidate to me for the first service. The other is a Benrus DR23. It winds and makes a few reluctant ticks, but then seems to stop. Casing looks like a complete gonner, and the dial is in pretty poor shape too. If the movement is not broken and just needs a service, I wonder if there's any possibility of getting a cheapo Chinese casing & dial to fit this movement in, or is it extremely unlikely to be the right size?   For a start, I want to strip & assemble a movement, perhaps a dozen times to build up the basic parts handling skills. I see that online advice is to buy a Chinese-made ST36 for this purpose. Can I just go at the Benrus or Ingersoll instead, or does it make more sense to get a cheap ST for this? Thank you.    
    • Hi,  I have this vintage Navitimer 806 with a bezel that plays a little bit as shown in this video: https://imgur.com/a/2NjdiF0 How would you fix this? I don't see where a gasket would fit for instance. Also, it seems this issue happens sometimes with older Navitimers.  Thanks
    • This is a screenshot of a video of it running. Not the best quality, though.
    • Depends what sizes of watches you mostly service . If you were to say pocket watches then you might benefit by wholly replacing the 9010 for 9020. As a rough guide hp500 is twice the viscosity of 9020 which is twice the viscosity of 9010 at 20°c.  So hp500 would give you a more mid-range oil between thin 9010 and HP1300, but as it happens hp750 is more mid- range than hp500, but is that more or less useful when oiling a train of wheels. After the barrel arbor the jump down in pivot size is around half, then after the centre wheel maybe more than half until the escapement. And pivot size isn't especially a deciding factor, as the torque and speed of a pivot would be more relevant when thinking about which oil to choose. So 750 might only be useful on a centre wheel and nothing else, and 500 might be better than 1300 for oiling the centre wheel but still comprises the rest of the train, where 9020 would be ok for the train but too thin for the centre wheel, leaving only 1300 for the oiling of it. You see the problem we're having here. What can be ok for one thing is less ok for another in a different way, damping down power compared to oil spread.  Maybe mixing a drop from two opposite range viscosity synthetic oils will give you some approximate thickness of an in-between . You want a short answer now ?  I tnink I'd go with the 9020. Now be prepared for a whole host of different answers. Then to go with this, watch manufacturers change their minds about which oils to use more times than actresses change their knickers. 
×
×
  • Create New...