Jump to content

Seiko 6319a , Seiko 2906a amplitude value ?


Recommended Posts

Friends, I have serviced Seiko 6319a and Seiko 2906a. I found the lift angles, but what should the amplitude value be? I am reading values between 190 and 200 degrees. Has anyone dealt with these mechanisms? Thanks.

Edited by Cihan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Cihan said:

I have serviced Seiko 6319a and Seiko 2906a. I found the lift angles, but what should the amplitude value be? I am reading values between 190 and 200 degrees. Has anyone dealt with these mechanisms?

What was the watches doing before you service them and it be nice to have numbers beyond timing in one position. Like dial up or down and then crown down for amplitude and if you to picture a timing machine that would be nice?

Seiko typically does not publish their amplitude they did publish it in one of their documents and it's really low. But typically they should do better than what you're seeing there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The Seiko service sheets mention minimum amplitude being 180, which is way too low I feel . Generally after a rebuild, 225-240ish is pretty good. After a few months running they usually settle in the high 240's and can go as high as 270's. in most cases on these Seiko movements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree, Seiko amplitudes do seem a little low compared to their Swiss counterparts. 220° is my baseline when just finished rebuild (not based on any science, just seems to be a reasonable number for them) and as @wudce mentions they do better after everything has had a chance to settle in.

Edited by Waggy
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wudce said:

The Seiko service sheets mention minimum amplitude being 180, which is way too low I feel . Generally after a rebuild, 225-240ish is pretty good. After a few months running they usually settle in the high 240's and can go as high as 270's. in most cases on these Seiko movements.

The 180° is with the watch in a vertical position, this is from the 4006 service sheet. 

image.png.f56c8b0fde49ac6a787a6c2c7d1e1cb6.png

So horizontal, that's probably 210-220° ?

You may think it too low, but they, the designers of the movement don't 🤣

I agree with @wudce and @Waggy  about 220 - 240° is fine for these movements. I've spent a long time trying everything to get some movements higher, but they just don't want to.
I have a couple of higher grade movements (23J Lord Matic Cal 5606) which do get 270-280°, but not the bog-standard movements.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should have said 180 in the vertical position. It's hard to get much better on these older Seiko. Was not long since I did two Seiko 5 with the 6309 movement which both got new mainsprings and both ran in the low 200 in the vertical position. For a 47 year old watch this is not bad.👌

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...