Jump to content

2x Barlow lens yes/no ?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I set my table at 75cm high. But I have tiltable microscope mount and I tilt it back about 15 to 20 degrees, so that brings the eyepieces lower and I don't have to peer down the eyepiece. And when working on the movement, the tilt allows longer tools to fit under the lenses. The tilt also prevents the hands from blocking the view. I highly recommend getting a tiltable mount.

That would be very nice .........

empty-pocket.thumb.jpg.3b4c4eb5665df3565aab49cc3cc4f62b.jpg

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Endeavor said:

I'm not aware if my table with 76cm is particularly high? With the 0.5x barlow lens and a movement in the movement-holder underneath, adjusted sharp, the distance from table-top to the top-edge of the eye-pieces is 50cm. With my adjustable chair in the highest position, I can just look down the microscope but I've to sit (uncomfortably) on the edge of the chair.  The base of the microscope stand takes already 5cm (it all adds up!). Without the base, it would probably have been okay, but that's not how it is. So, with my current setup, the 0.5x Barlow doesn't work well for me (1.84mtr).

My table is the same height, 76cm.  I have the head on an articulated arm, which gives a height to the centre of the eyepieces as 42cm.  I can see why you have problems at 50cm. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Endeavor said:

I'm not aware if my table with 76cm is particularly high? With the 0.5x barlow lens and a movement in the movement-holder underneath, adjusted sharp, the distance from table-top to the top-edge of the eye-pieces is 50cm. With my adjustable chair in the highest position, I can just look down the microscope but I've to sit (uncomfortably) on the edge of the chair.  The base of the microscope stand takes already 5cm (it all adds up!). Without the base, it would probably have been okay, but that's not how it is. So, with my current setup, the 0.5x Barlow doesn't work well for me (1.84mtr).

You are relatively tall 6'1" ish . A cushion on the seat of your chair ?

1 hour ago, tomh207 said:

Fantastic idea Tom

28 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

That would be very nice .........

empty-pocket.thumb.jpg.3b4c4eb5665df3565aab49cc3cc4f62b.jpg

I know how you feel mate, i spent a small fortune on this hobby last month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

A cushion on the seat of your chair ?

I came with another idea 😆

442356691_tableseat.thumb.jpeg.b27743dc5b96b624cfa5e83ae36ca9e1.jpeg

 

Anyhow, a long story short; so far I'm very happy without a Barlow lens and without one, everything is at a perfect height. Currently I can't see the cost / benefit doing all kinds of trick just to be able to use a 0.5x Barlow lens. With my current setup the lens doesn't work and that is, as far as I'm concerned, it.

However, I'll keep all your gratefully received suggestions in mind, this in case I stumble over another setup option.

So, a BIG thank you 😉

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I set my table at 75cm high. But I have tiltable microscope mount and I tilt it back about 15 to 20 degrees, so that brings the eyepieces lower and I don't have to peer down the eyepiece. And when working on the movement, the tilt allows longer tools to fit under the lenses. The tilt also prevents the hands from blocking the view. I highly recommend getting a tiltable mount.

No offers to show us your workspace then Hector. Did you conveniently forget or avoid it. Come on your have 3 tables in there, who of us has 3 tables in our watchrooms. If its special we want to see it matey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Endeavor said:

The base of the microscope stand takes already 5cm (it all adds up!). 

That's the difference. If my scope were 5cm higher, I'd need to adjust my seat up to be able to use it. Does the base create any ergonomic issues with your hands? It seems like a small 5cm shelf around the movement holder would be pretty annoying and set up some awkward wrist angles. Especially if you're having a long work session.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spectre6000 said:

Does the base create any ergonomic issues with your hands? It seems like a small 5cm shelf around the movement holder would be pretty annoying and set up some awkward wrist angles. Especially if you're having a long work session.

If one were to work continuously under the microscope, perhaps yes. But I'm not, that was not the purpose of me buying the microscope.

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No offers to show us your workspace then Hector. Did you conveniently forget or avoid it. Come on your have 3 tables in there, who of us has 3 tables in our watchrooms. If its special we want to see it matey. 

Eh, me but they are all covered with watchmaking tools and computer stuff, oh electronics as well. Much clutter, I do need to put up some shelves to make space to work.

 

Tom

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

Eh, me but they are all covered with watchmaking tools and computer stuff, oh electronics as well. Much clutter, I do need to put up some shelves to make space to work.

 

Tom

I'm  catching up, i have two and a chest of drawers full of stock. I just love seeing how other folk arrange their spaces. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I'm  catching up, i have two and a chest of drawers full of stock. I just love seeing how other folk arrange their spaces. 

I would not call mine “arranged” at the moment Rich 😂

 

Tom

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No offers to show us your workspace then Hector. Did you conveniently forget or avoid it. Come on your have 3 tables in there, who of us has 3 tables in our watchrooms. If its special we want to see it matey. 

It's still a works in progress. It was my parent's room and it still has some of their old stuff and junk accumulated over the years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes i did eventually realise that the oil will act as a barrier, I'm sure the discussion will continue. Ive had two oleophobic coffees ( added coconut ) and in the meantime i have this just delivered to take my mind off epilame for the time being. My favourite type of dial, its a beautiful looking watch traditional English made and it runs,  the ticktock is phenomenal,  i can hear it across my living room .  You wont believe how much it was. Thats interesting about synthetic oils , i thought the same, going from a 2 year service to 5 years is a big drop in income for service folk.  I expect some did well when they embraced the use of synthetic,  probably drawing in more customers than those that didn't use the new fangled substances , i bet fairly short lived though. The more frequent service makes more sense to me, not for just the service but for the regular check up inspections that might pick up impending faults. As far as epilame goes, wouldn't it be great to be able to fumigate the complete movement in a sealed jar of heated stearic acid, 🤔 now theres a thought 😅.
    • Imm going to close the discussion by attaching the photo of my super-titanium after several vicissitudes finally working. Purchased as not working I replaced the battery and for a stroke of luck I found its semi-new solar panel which, having verified its operation, seems to recharge the accumulator perfectly. I had taken this watch almost by bet, with 40 euros I brought it back to life. The initial half idea was to resell it to finance another purchase, but.. it's definitely a nice item. It would need to check the impermeability but it's a pleasure to see it on the wrist 😃
    • In fact the secret is to go gently and find the way without forcing, and the movement enters without problems
    • Yea a have given it a full service this movement is chinese 2813 whats the lift angle for this movement does anyone knows  and how  do a remove the default  of 52 degrees on my timegrapher?   Hi you said my lift angle is default how do a remove this from my timegrapher?
    • Sure! Some very accomplished repairers never use epilame! I have often wondered if it is worth the trouble. Not using epilame will shorten the service intervals though, but that could be better perhaps both for the owner and the repairer!? Speaking of oiling, I just read this: After WWII in the 1950s the first Synthetic Oils came on the market. Most watchmakers did not rush to use these oils since they were bad for business now that the watch serviced with Synthetic oil would not come back to him for service for another 5-7 years he would lose a lot of income. ~Ofrei.com   Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised if it would be more correct to think of epilame as a binder rather than a repellant. Until convinced otherwise that's how I will think of epilame.
×
×
  • Create New...