Jump to content

Hello from PA


DBMoore

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I have always been fascinated with mechanical watches and have enjoyed my constantly changing collection over the years.  While I've "tinkered" with some of them, I have decided to take it to the next level and see where it all leads me.  Starting with a (probably) 1919 Hamilton (of Lancaster, PA) 956 pocket watch that is in serious need of a good service and attention in general.

Thanks for taking a moment.

Dan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome Dan!

Presumably you've watched all of the YT videos, so you probably understand that there's more to a "good service" than in just "tinkering". You might consider taking Mark's self-paced, online set of courses. There's also a new guy doing videos that are targeted at people just started out and he does a good job covering what you'd need to get started (as does Mark).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grsnovi,

Very true and I would never imply that what little experience I have would equate to anything like good service.  It was already my intention to do so, but I will definitely look into the beginner courses.  Thank you for the advice.

Dan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DBMoore said:

Very true

Hi Dan, I didn't intend to imply that your "tinkering" wasn't good enough to perform a good service, only that there may be more needed. For example, I "tinkered" with a junk set of screw drivers and a case opener but once I got "serious" I realized that I needed a lot more. Some folks show up and make an introduction and have worked on all sorts of mechanical things over their lives but the size of a watch makes everything you do pretty critical.

There's quite a lot of information "out there" as well as "in here" and I think that as long as your Hamilton wasn't rusting on a junk heap for the last 70 years, you'll find a lot of help.

My first foray into this was via a grade 313 Elgin.

Have you opened up the Hamilton yet? Do you have a serial number? Have you visited the https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/ to determine the details of your Hamilton? Once you start down this road and begin to ask questions people here will want to see photographs of both sides of the movement and if the watch has a beautiful case, we'll want to see that too... 🙂 

Again welcome and hopefully I didn't come across as a jerk?

- Gary

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary,

Thanks and I didn't mean to imply anything other than I'm being realistic about my current lack of skills and my desire to improve them.

I have opened the Hamilton..  the movement S/N is 1693500 which, according to pocketwatchdatabase.com, is from 1923.  While I really like the guilded dial, the crystal was broken so, long term, my biggest concern is restoring it (the dial) and particularly the discoloration between 10:30 and 12:30 (see attachments).  I'll post pics of the case later.  However, I haven't gone further than removing the movement from the case and then removing the hands and dial.  At this point, particularly the jewels look dirty but I'm not seeing any rust.  So, short term, assuming no problems crop up, my main goal is to take my time and get the movement cleaned and in solid working order.  And then focus on the dial.

Thanks again.

Dan.

IMG_E5146.JPG

IMG_E5152.JPG

Hamilton 956 sn 1693500 1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...