Jump to content

Three more Ellott clocks for my collection


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

This first one arrived today. It's a nice Bur Walnut case shame it has two tiny marks that need to be sorted other than that it is in all round very good condition.

The second one will be with me in a few days, it also is in very good all round condition. Both bought from ebay, both under £50 each. 

Got this one this evening its a WESTMINSTER & WHITTINGTON chime with platform escapement for just under £200 including P/P. 

s-l1600 (1).jpg

s-l1600 (2).jpg

s-l1600 (1).jpg

Edited by oldhippy
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

Excellent movements. Well made cases. The movements are very easy to repair and all made using very good hard brass. 

 

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

Excellent movements. Well made cases. The movements are very easy to repair and all made using very good hard brass. 

Nice indeed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • oldhippy changed the title to Three more Ellott clocks for my collection

Beautiful pieces!

I'm able to keep my watches in my dresser drawer. I was able to keep my guitars in a closet. Where do you keep your clocks (and how many do you have)?

My wife just commented that she also thought those were beautiful and that I should "do" clocks since the pieces are bigger 🙂

- Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the moment they are all over the home. I'm having some nice shelves made so they can be displayed. I have two french clocks one has the complete garnish it is in a sort of light brown mottled look which strikes on a bell. The other is just a nice black slate which also strikes on a bell. A  westminster whittington quarter-hour chime a English strike. A Georgian fusee bracket clock that chimes and strikes on a peal of bells, which needs a lot of work. I'm always looking for a small wall clock but I can't find one that I like. I haven't included the Ellott chime as it hasn't arrived it will be here next week. 

Edited by oldhippy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome! To which part of India will my greetings go? Frank
    • I agree with @Waggy, no need to adjust. That looks very good to me. The factory specs for 7S26 are something like -35 to +45s/day, but they are usually better. The amplitude is good. When wearing, the most important positions are dial up, crown down and crown left. You need to regulate so that these positions average out to about zero. Crown down is showing +14, so you may have to set dial up to slightly minus s/day. The absolute values of +/-s/day don't really matter, as long as they aren't too far out. The only way to get good accuracy is to wear it for a couple of days, recording the errors, and gradually tweaking.
    • @Jon The link is no longer working and I wanted to see that demonstration again. Is there any chance you can make it available again? I'd appreciate it!
    • Or, if you have a staking set or jewelling too, just use one of the stumps. You can choose a fine tip to fit inside a jewel if necessary.
    • Good morning,   To be honest, I'm not sure I trust my own logic anymore 😅. But here's a picture of my own (failed!) attempt to install a new rotor axle. I punched way to hard and even split the metal of the rotor. My thinking was that, in my case, the axle sits "deeper" in the rotor and hence the rotor would be closer to the movement plates. Vice versa, I was thinking that a very light punch could cause the rotor to sit rather high. But not sure that makes sense because in both cases, the flat part of the axle and the rotor align equally.     Sorry, but is he saying that the outside of the caseback has been polished to such an extent that the inside of the caseback has deformed/sunk??? That sounds crazy to me because those casebacks are thick! Can you see any signs of that on the inside of the caseback? Have you tried screwing in the caseback a litte bit more or less so that the supposedly "sunk" part of the caseback would move from 9 o'clock to e.g. 6/7 or 11/12 o'clock?  If the caseback is truly deformed, maybe it could be punched/pressed back into shape (e.g. with glass/caseback closing press).      I agree with your choice. But yea, Rolex makes it VERY hard for independent watchmakers to do a perfect job because we can't get (original) parts easily.      Your pictures aren't too bad. But still impossible to see if the rotor isn't perfectly flat. You'd have to look at it with your loupe, from the side (like the pictures), and turn the rotor to see if the gaps (with the automatic bridge plates) increase/decrease.     Finally... how is the up/down play of the rotor? To test, take a toothpick/pegwood and press on the small triangular side of the rotor next to the axle (NOT the big side where the weight is. But the opposite side.). Does that lift up the weight-side of the rotor? There can be some play, but it should really be minimal. If there's too much play, a new spring clip is the first thing to do. After that, one could play around with the jewels. This is too much:
×
×
  • Create New...