Jump to content

Steve, new to this site


Stelen

Recommended Posts

Hi, my name is Steve, I live in Wales. I did Marks course last year and have doing watch repair and servicing of my own watches

 

I was given a watche by a friend to service, this is a Rubelin and Graf, which I believe is a Chinese movement. After stripping the movement one of the incabloc springs was broken. I went onto Cousins uk. After looking at the springs they have, which always refer to a movement number or type, I am non the wiser. I have measured the jewel and the housing but cannot make sense of the numbers could anyone please help with determining the size and or how to correctly measure for the correct spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Steve, I have yet to encounter an Incablock shock setting in my very short journey down this road. I've also been waiting days to be allowed to buy at Cousins. I never even suspected that those tiny springs came in different sizes.

So - I'm of no help to you but welcome to the forum!

I'm in the middle of Mark's level 2 course and have a bunch of movements but I've been waiting on a mainspring winder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum.

We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement. 

Is there a cal number on the movement? Some good photos would help. If there is no cal on the movement we need photos of the keyless work side and a photo of the incabloc. Give us as much info as you can.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Thank you!   Yes I did. I did not notice a difference. Although 9415 is advertised as a thixotropic grease (and I did had high hopes for it), the only advantage at this point I see is that its “easier” to apply than an oil (if one does not use epilame). But this is subjective, I guess. What I did notice though, if you apply a bit too much grease, that definitely slows down the movement. Oil in this case is a bit more forgiving, as its super thin, and it would usually just spread out.  Again, imho.
    • Mark keeps a close eye on his forum. I'm sure if you asked him he will reply, he might not do it right away but you will receive his answer.  
    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that. When cohesive forces within a liquid are stronger than the adhesive forces of a surface then surface tension is high causing the liquid to bead up. So  an applied epilame coating reduces the adhesive force of a surface inhibiting a fluid to wet the surface. So i guess no epilame cannot both repel and attract . If something is keeping the oil in place on top of an epilamed surface then there must be another reason for that.
    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
×
×
  • Create New...