Jump to content

Replaced balance complete--SLOW!!!


Recommended Posts

This is an Elgin pocket watch Grade 384.  I posted about making a staff and breaking the roller table.

I got a balance complete and installed it today.

It was running slow.  I thought maybe there was a hairspring length problem, so I exchanged with the original hairspring.  SLOW.

Amplitude is good.

Now I am wondering about the actual balance wheel.  See the pictures.

I am wondering about extra weight due to the extra screws.  This balance wheel is designed to compensate for temperature and the screws are part of that calibration process--I know that much.

Should I shorten the hairpsring?  Remove screws?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

This is an Elgin pocket watch Grade 384.  I posted about making a staff and breaking the roller table.

I got a balance complete and installed it today.

It was running slow.  I thought maybe there was a hairspring length problem, so I exchanged with the original hairspring.  SLOW.

Amplitude is good.

Now I am wondering about the actual balance wheel.  See the pictures.

I am wondering about extra weight due to the extra screws.  This balance wheel is designed to compensate for temperature and the screws are part of that calibration process--I know that much.

Should I shorten the hairpsring?  Remove screws?

If it runs slow. Depends how slow it runs. I would remove weight from the mean-time screws. But make sure it is not something else, like the regulator pins being too far apart. That would cause it to run slow. Or perhaps the hairspring is outside the regulator pins. Does it have a good amplitude?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Isn't it an overcoil?

Yes.

 

2 hours ago, jdrichard said:

If it runs slow. Depends how slow it runs. I would remove weight from the mean-time screws. But make sure it is not something else, like the regulator pins being too far apart. That would cause it to run slow. Or perhaps the hairspring is outside the regulator pins. Does it have a good amplitude?

It has good amplitude.

While I think there is still some issue with the balance, it is secondary to another issue.  It seems that there is binding in the keyless works which is giving resistance to the center wheel via the cannon pinion.  This evening I discovered that that the minute hand even STOPPED while the balance was ticking away.

More investigation is required...but I am going to turn in.  Those who fight and run away live to fight another day.

It is a most interesting problem...I will keep you updated as it unfolds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Should I shorten the hairpsring?  Remove screws?

With overcoils, removing weight from screws is THE option. 

 

8 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Amplitude is good.

Now I am wondering about the actual balance wheel.  See the pictures.

Good amplitude sends me to look for  cause of the issue  outside main train,  I think you have found where the issue is located,  I would eliminate the minute train and see what happens. 

I haven't received a picutre.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

With overcoils, removing weight from screws is THE option. 

This is definitely correct. Over coil hairsprings are premade. Premade so that they can be in very exacting specifications. Changing the length with a screw up the specifications and is not acceptable unless you're super desperate and it's still not acceptable. The preferred method is to play with the screws that's why they're there.

And yes there it exacting specifications so it's best not the play with them too much and if you are playing with them try to do it close to the alarm if you are worried about the temperature because the closer you are to an arm the less likely it is to bother anything. Usually today nobody worries or cares about that.

7 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

This evening I discovered that that the minute hand even STOPPED while the balance was ticking away.

Usually best to verify your watch is working before you case it up and put the hands on.

Then out of curiosity just how slow are we talking anyway? Plus I seem to be having eyesight problems I can't see the pictures?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took the picture but failed to attache it.  Here it is.  The balance to the right is the old balance.

I have since removed the two screws at the spokes in order not to affect temperature compensation.  I figured that much out.

Yes it is an overcoil, and I see that the length should not be fiddled with.  In fact one of the studs has no feature for adjusting.

2022-03-01 16_56_31-20220301_163700.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, more pictures and an interesting discovery.

On the theory that there is some binding on the dial side (aka motion works), I took a look at the plate that covers the minute wheel.  It is not planer (shown in the image clamped to a razor blade).  Perhaps that is a problem.  Still does not resolve the terrible time signature on the time grapher.  I will provide some additional detail on a subsequent post.

2022-03-02 08_32_50-IMG_8178.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 08_32_34-IMG_8177.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 08_32_02-IMG_8175.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

  Still does not resolve the terrible time signature on the time grapher. 

Is there any problem other than runing slow?   helps to know   how slow  ? 

I make sure the fault isn't anywhere else,  before I touch a balance of this grade.  think you are rushing.

Regards

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Is there any problem other than runing slow?   helps to know   how slow  ? 

I make sure the fault isn't anywhere else,  before I touch a balance of this grade.  think you are rushing.

Regards

 

No, the staff was broken.  I attempted to make a staff and failed...broke the roller table (staff was 40um to large in diameter).  All of this was covered in a different post.  Bought a new balance complete on ebay.  That is what is installed on the balance cock. 

How slow?  The timegrapher indicated hundreds of seconds per day.  But, the signature was somewhat unbelievable.  Then I noticed that within a day, I lost an hour or more.  BUT!!!  At the end of the day yesterday I discovered that the keyless works work impeding the cannon pinion.  That is what caused me to investigate the minute wheel cover plate.

Am I going too fast and in the wrong order?  Perhaps.  Perhaps not.  Here is a timeline of this watch which has been going on for a week and a half.

Opened the watch to discover broken balance.
Proceeded with disassembly and clean anyway.
After clean, I disassembled the balance.
Found a staff that was close and turned it to fit (almost!! grrrr)
Installed the staff on the balance wheel.
Put the balance wheel in the watch without hairspring or roller table and guard.
Tested for end shake and side shake--seemed fine.
Installed the safety roller and roller jewel--busted the roller jewel because I failed to turn the staff down enough.
Found a new balance complete on ebay
Installed it when it arrived.
Good amplitude but erratic timegrapher behavior
Put the watch on my oscilloscope to view the trace.  A little noisy, but a reasonable (IMO) signature.
Appeared to be a little out of beat.  I adjusted the collet and got it closer in beat (though this was a minor issue)
Back on the bench, install hands
Discovered losing on the order of an hour during the day
<<<<at this point I should have spent some time in reflection>>>>
Removed the hairspring and installed the original hairspring.
No real difference.
Removed two screws from the balance.
THEN I DISCOVERED THAT THE KEYLESS WORKS MIGHT BE THE PROBLEM
Investigated the minute wheel and cover...non planar
It is running on the bench now without the minute-wheel cover plate
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I think you will be putting the screws and the spring that came on the new balance complete back on, as you have found the fault and its the minute gear bridge.

As always American watches show bad temper specially in area of banking pins, pallets so on.

I'll be reading JohnR advice and  trying to learn as you fix this one. 

Good luck

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 I think you will be putting the screws and the spring that came on the new balance complete back on, as you have found the fault and its the minute gear bridge.

As always American watches show bad temper specially in area of banking pins, pallets so on.

I'll be reading JohnR advice and  trying to learn as you fix this one. 

Good luck

 

 

 

I put the screws back on.  Gonna wait on the spring.  Every time you take it apart, there is additional risk.  The screws were easy because I have the right tools!!  Yay.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided not to read anything below the pictures because we have a problem?

As a reminder this is an American pocket watch and there's a problem? When the movement is out of the case there is no stem. Why is that a problem the stem is found in the case the position of the stem is controlled by the sleeve in the case. When an American pocket watch comes out of the case it goes into setting. Like my picture isn't that wheel in the setting position? As everybody should grasp if you run a watch while in setting your driving the entire setting mechanism and simplistically that is bad.

American watch companies grasping that their movements might have to run out of the case usually have a procedure to put it into the winding position or running position. I can't see enough of the movement to see what I need to see. Sometimes they'll be a screw that you turn other times they'll be a little lever like thing that's near where the stem would go in that you pull out. To basically look at how the setting components work and there should be something in there to allow it to go back in the winding position. That hopefully will improve things

then if you ever seen any of my windings and fussing is about hairsprings now you know why hairsprings are typically vibrated to each balance wheel. But if you have an over a coil of the over coil has to be made very exacting position. So what they do is they match the balance wheel to the hairspring. The factory had all the different timing screws and then they also undercut the balance screws themselves to bring each one into the right timing to match the hairspring. This is why mixing and matching hairsprings will result in dramatic timing issues. So I would put the original hairspring back on the balance wheel and try to deal with the hot otherwise you're going to have to be playing with the screws quite a bit and you may still have to do it if somebody did a mix-and-match of not grasping that one hairspring is not identical to another.

 

 

pocket watch running in setting mode is bad.JPG

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

I decided not to read anything below the pictures because we have a problem?

As a reminder this is an American pocket watch and there's a problem? When the movement is out of the case there is no stem. Why is that a problem the stem is found in the case the position of the stem is controlled by the sleeve in the case. When an American pocket watch comes out of the case it goes into setting. Like my picture isn't that wheel in the setting position? As everybody should grasp if you run a watch while in setting your driving the entire setting mechanism and simplistically that is bad.

American watch companies grasping that their movements might have to run out of the case usually have a procedure to put it into the winding position or running position. I can't see enough of the movement to see what I need to see. Sometimes they'll be a screw that you turn other times they'll be a little lever like thing that's near where the stem would go in that you pull out. To basically look at how the setting components work and there should be something in there to allow it to go back in the winding position. That hopefully will improve things

then if you ever seen any of my windings and fussing is about hairsprings now you know why hairsprings are typically vibrated to each balance wheel. But if you have an over a coil of the over coil has to be made very exacting position. So what they do is they match the balance wheel to the hairspring. The factory had all the different timing screws and then they also undercut the balance screws themselves to bring each one into the right timing to match the hairspring. This is why mixing and matching hairsprings will result in dramatic timing issues. So I would put the original hairspring back on the balance wheel and try to deal with the hot otherwise you're going to have to be playing with the screws quite a bit and you may still have to do it if somebody did a mix-and-match of not grasping that one hairspring is not identical to another.

 

 

pocket watch running in setting mode is bad.JPG

Good points of course.  What was not fully conveyed was that, literally, the cannon pinion would lock hard and the hand would not move.  I posted about the non-planarity of the minute wheel cover.  I have since investigated further.  Running your finger on the bottom of the plate I could also feel a burr.  Anyway, using an extra fine diamond plate, I smoothed the bottom and established a planar surface and thus removed the burr.

In terms of running in setting position, frankly I missed that.  Will remedy and report back.

As far is the uniqueness of every watch that goes out of the factory w/r to balance and hairspring--I get it.  To do it right, I should remove the staff, roller, and hairspring and put it on the other balance wheel--a matched set.  Gonna try to avoid that if possible (if I were a couple of years down the road, perhaps I would not hesitate).

I will report back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

 To do it right, I should remove the staff, roller, and hairspring and put it on the other balance wheel--a matched set.  Gonna try to avoid that if possible (if I were a couple of years down the road, perhaps I would not hesitate).

I will report back.

It's simpler than that. The hairspring is matched to the balance assembly, which is comprised of the balance, staff and roller. For all intents and purposes the roller and staff are interchangeable; if you replace a staff (carefully) there is rarely any need to even touch the poise, much less the general rate, same with roller.

 

But the inertia of one balance compared to another, even seemingly identical, can vary wildly, so springs and balances become a set.

 

Also, you would never remove and reinstall a staff, as it would just be a mess.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2022 at 9:37 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

OK, more pictures and an interesting discovery.

On the theory that there is some binding on the dial side (aka motion works), I took a look at the plate that covers the minute wheel.  It is not planer (shown in the image clamped to a razor blade).  Perhaps that is a problem.  Still does not resolve the terrible time signature on the time grapher.  I will provide some additional detail on a subsequent post.

2022-03-02 08_32_50-IMG_8178.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 08_32_34-IMG_8177.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 08_32_02-IMG_8175.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

You need to have a dial washer to ouch down the hour wheel so it engages when th the Minute wheel when the face is on and the watch is Not face up. Gravity not your friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the saga continues...trying to dial this thing in like a RR watch!  It is an opportunity to learn new things.

This morning I added some timing washers.  Trying to get the regulator mid scale when timed. 

Happily, me pappy left me this nice assortment of timing washers...calibrated in minutes/day.

2022-03-10 08_32_36-Window.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

This is an older one but I'm just stopping by to say I learned a bunch from this interesting thread. I came here to see if pulling out timing screws on a wristwatch movement might get me closer to timekeeping without pushing the regulator to its +limit. I knew the balance wheel and hairspring were matched, but what I had was one with a good staff & hairspring twisted badly right at the collet, and another with a good hairspring and broken staff.

 

It's quite a cheap 7j watch and it's for me to keep so I thought I'd try swapping them since I don't know how to fix a hairspring twisted where I can't even grip it.

But the main thing I got here is the info about American pocket watches driving the setting mechanism when uncased. This might explain why I've had a few where acceptable regulation goes awry once I cased it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks Rich, its really not that difficult to make them, simple ones anyway. Cousins didn't have the part though i could find it on ebay at 6.50. I figure i earned about £1.50/ hr . It paid for the diamond files i bought.
    • If you look at this thread, you can see I had exactly the same problems with balance springs with 2 prongs on a Smiths 627. The slots in the chaton were not big enough to get the ends of the spring out. I had to bend them to get them out and back in. Not ideal. I don't fancy having to do it again as they could easily break, and where would you find replacements? I didn't come across the 3 prong type.     
    • I visited the Breguet Exhibition today. https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/about-us/press-office/rare-timepieces-unveiled-new-display-science-museum The Science Museum now holds the collection of "The Worshipful Company of Clockmakers" - "The collection includes more than 600 watches, 90 clocks, 30 marine chronometers and a number of fine sundials and examples of hand engraving, mapping the history of innovation in watch and clock making in London from 1600 to the present day." It's well worth a visit. They have some amazing pieces by the likes of Harrison, Breguet, Tompion etc . I've visited twice before but decided to go and see the Breguet Exhibition. Maybe I was expecting too much, as on reflection, "More than 20 extraordinary timepieces designed by inventor and watchmaker Abraham-Louis Breguet " isn't going to take up that much space. In reality, it's just one cabinet. But, Oh those watches, stunning 🤩 , e.g. (No 1297 was made for George III and is valued about £1m)   I tried a couple of pics, but with subdued lighting and taking through glass, they aren't good. I like thin hands on a watch - how about these (I think this is a split second chrono)   And this one, with all it's complications, is only 10mm thick !   What I found very interesting were a few very old machines for making watch parts, like this 17th Century gear cutter. The disc below has concentric rings with holes in, so that is can be set to cut varying teeth numbers.       
    • Firstly sorry for poor image quality I only have an iPhone for photos.    Im working on a 512 movement and I’ve had some trouble with the “jewels”. I’ve got the metal one out, but when I tried to put it back the three sides of the spring seem to need pressing all at once to fit it as there are three “holes”. I get two corners in but as I go for the third the first two pop out! Constantly I’ve lost the spring. I’ve done the similar ones on seiko movements without trouble. Assuming I find it/a replacement, what am I missing!   on the other side with the only ruby in the movement is a setting with no “gap”at all. How do I get the spring out, and of course get it back in!    What am I missing!    thanks in advance.    Rob
    • Links like that are the reason I routinely donate to the Internet Archive - they are the last safe house for a tremendous amount of useful info that is otherwise lost.
×
×
  • Create New...