Jump to content

Help ID this pocket watch please


Recommended Posts

Could some please shed some light on this watch company? This pocket watch belonged to my beloved grandfather. He passed away 40 years ago, but I do remember from my childhood that he never wore a wrist watch. This thing was always with him, in his pocket. Not to make this too boring, but recently, through a lot of writing with all my cousins around the world (the whole family has dispersed), I managed to find out who has the watch and they provided me with some photos. I clearly remember the chain 🙂

Anyway, I cannot find any information on "Moda". This was was bought in Europe, where we had lived. Is anybody here familiar with this company? I'd like to know more about it.

Many many thanks.

 

 

911f018d-1e0a-4c8a-8401-8a14af13f55a.jpg

944f776b-a39f-411f-b74d-1f81b1ca378d.jpg

cc5c0066-3dba-4aca-ab2b-f941827e8579.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello there Moda is French for Fashion so you will need to open and post pictures of the movement.This will give everyone a chance to shed some light. From that we can establish a rough date and hopefully who manufactured the movement. I think that's your best shot. Hope this helps. 

Graziano 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't say anything for certain until I see the movement pics.  As Graziano says, such pictures are your best hope.

That said, I remember reading about some Angelus watches that were labeled "Moda" for Italian export. We will see.

"Chronometre" just *may* in this case be used as the Swiss reference for timepiece.  (The Swiss love confusing us with their use of French.)  But it also says you should have an anchor lever, 16 ruby bearings (an even number this time?) and Breguet overcoil hairspring.  Photographs of the movement should show us these things, and hopefully a maker's mark or name also.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now I'm making do with a similar micrometer (the one below is $45 shipped but you can find better deals) and a $20 stand. You do have to be excruciatingly careful measuring jewels, since there's no table, but if you don't have the $500 to throw around, it's a nice option.
    • As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!
    • Next one up an AS 554, looks like a bit more to this one. First job is to check thickness, most springs are somewhere between .3 and .4, this one measures .35, that matches in with the .4 spring steel i ordered. So for marking up a permanent marker comes in handy to colour up the steel to be marked later with a scriber once its dry. Bestfit provide the extra bit of info for the jumper spring that is missing.
    • Thanks again, Marc.  Super helpful. I was wondering what the hole was for, and now it makes perfect sense. With your help and the other members here, it looks like I'm good to go with my Seitz tool set. I had to order some replacement pushers, but with those, the set is complete and in good condition. Now, I need to figure out what tool to buy to measure jewels (amongst other watch-related parts). I had my eye on the JKA Feintaster micrometers, but people get crazy bidding on them for $400-600 USD. I was thinking of just a regular digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). Thoughts?  Mahalo. Frank      
    • Yep, that's exactly how it should fit. The reamer shank is tapered and the socket in the spindle is also tapered so that the one centers in the other and is gripped tightly. If there is any wobble when the reamer is seated as far it will go then there is a problem. The cross hole in the spindle is to allow you the push the reamer back out again. If the reamer seated much deeper then it would limit the access for pushing it back out again. Here is one of mine for comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...