Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is the kind of thing that gets me the most excited. Super interesting. Opens the door to a lot of really thin movements. There's an animation in there of the gear train plan relative to one with a lever, and it's painfully obvious that zero effort was given to make it flat. It looks very much like they adapted an existing movement. That price point is also pretty attractive. I wonder if it has a sound as well. 40hz is an audible frequency, but the low mass and low amplitude of the oscillator may mean it can't be heard. That suspicion is doubled with their use of a laser for regulation since a more conventional system would be easy, accurate, and inexpensive. 

Posted

This is certainly interesting indeed. It depends on the new very thin silicone escape disc staying flexible so only over a sustained period will it be proven. Very impressive I must say. 

Posted

Having spent the last 45 years as a technologist, seeing novel innovations like this is exciting.  However, technology for the sake of itself may be little more than titillating.

So...what have they done with this new innovation?  Well, they merged two established arts: mechanical movements, with MEMs ((microelectromechanical systems) technology.  MEMs stands on the shoulders of 60 years of silicon (not silicone, btw) fabrication technology. All of you have MEMs in your life already.  It is in every one of your phones.  Some of you (on another thread) are playing with MEMs microphones for watch timers.

If it sounds like I am dumping on these guys, I am not.  This is clever innovation.

One market served by this innovation is the one where people desire a sweep second hand in a thin, low-power watch.  This is the niche where they will thrive IMO.  Accutron was the early sweep solution, but there were problems.  Accutron now has a high-frequency watch with a sweep second, but I think it is power hungry and thick (correct me if I am wrong...going from memory). Is there another sweep-second solution out there? 

I have a friend who wears a Rolex.  Probably worth 15 grand.  Sends it in once a year for service at $600 a pop.  There is much I do not understand about this business!!

Posted

It will be not too far in the future where the whole watch is silicon based and not able to be repaired as they will be sealed units and the complete module will be a plug in. We are nearly there with the quartz watch as is but we still have to change the dial and hands over so some semi skilled human intervention is called for  The future watch will be complete with dial and hands and a lifetime powercell which will be self charging, most likely via solar power. So what impact will it have on the business,  Much the same as the business model being applied now by SWATCH, all modules will be changed by the factory or their agents/sales out lets. As there will be no parts exchange there can and will not be any protest such as the present SWATCH/Cousins action and therefore the manufacturer will have total control on the product from beginning to end. A daunting prospect. To assuage the green lobby/climate change people the whole spent module will be recycleable thereby enhancing their GREEN image as an industry. probably on an exchange basis, send the old one in and get a discount on the new one.  Whats your opinion.

Posted

That is close,  being as it is a multipurpose computer, I was thinking more on the traditional lines It looks like an analogue watch. It contains all the functions of the traditional watch but modular. completer with dial and hands. There are people who prefer the traditional look. Apple watches and their kin are not really appealing to look at.

Posted
On 3/26/2021 at 11:45 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

Having spent the last 45 years as a technologist, seeing novel innovations like this is exciting.  However, technology for the sake of itself may be little more than titillating.

So...what have they done with this new innovation?  Well, they merged two established arts: mechanical movements, with MEMs ((microelectromechanical systems) technology.  MEMs stands on the shoulders of 60 years of silicon (not silicone, btw) fabrication technology. All of you have MEMs in your life already.  It is in every one of your phones.  Some of you (on another thread) are playing with MEMs microphones for watch timers.

If it sounds like I am dumping on these guys, I am not.  This is clever innovation.

One market served by this innovation is the one where people desire a sweep second hand in a thin, low-power watch.  This is the niche where they will thrive IMO.  Accutron was the early sweep solution, but there were problems.  Accutron now has a high-frequency watch with a sweep second, but I think it is power hungry and thick (correct me if I am wrong...going from memory). Is there another sweep-second solution out there? 

I have a friend who wears a Rolex.  Probably worth 15 grand.  Sends it in once a year for service at $600 a pop.  There is much I do not understand about this business!!

Seiko spring drive

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...