Jump to content

Meaning of "Balance complete"


Recommended Posts

What does it mean?

1) Does it mean balance wheel?

2) Does it mean balance wheel and hairspring?

3) Does it mean balance wheel, hairspring, and balance cock?

4) Does it mean balance wheel, hairspring, balance cock AND associated top jewel (e.g. incabloc jewel installed)?

I received a "balance complete" today that passed, 1,2,3 but failed #4.  Missing the incabloc jewel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

What does it mean?

1) Does it mean balance wheel?

2) Does it mean balance wheel and hairspring?

3) Does it mean balance wheel, hairspring, and balance cock?

4) Does it mean balance wheel, hairspring, balance cock AND associated top jewel (e.g. incabloc jewel installed)?

I received a "balance complete" today that passed, 1,2,3 but failed #4.  Missing the incabloc jewel.

You got ripped off. Getting a picture is the only way to sure

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jdrichard said:

Getting a picture is the only way to sure

I have myself to blame partially.  There were multiple pictures.  Only one showing the top incabloc spring.  You have to zoom in to see that the jewel is missing.  But the description should have been enough.

So, what did I do?

First of all I took a bet that the Landeron 248 would substitute for the Landeron 51 (all derivatives of the Landeron 48 or some such).  So, I put the L51 balance cock on the L248 balance and spring.  Turns out that the L248 staff is about 100 microns longer. No bueno.  So I put the new hairspring (the part that was bad) on the old balance wheel attached to the old cock.

It is working.  Have not timed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

What does it mean?

Complete means all the parts associated with the balance wheel.  then typically it's not a DIY it all comes assembled. In other words the balance wheel, the balance staff, the roller table, the roller jewel and hairspring. In other words everything that normally is attached to the balance wheel. You do not get a complimentary balance bridge or the rest of the watch unless it says movement complete although usually it says movement they don't put the word complete.

 

9 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

First of all I took a bet that the Landeron 248 would substitute for the Landeron 51 (all derivatives of the Landeron 48 or some such).

This is where personally for me I like to look these things up I like to know exactly what I'm getting. But on a prior discussion with this group the group likes to? Basically they like to play darts with a blindfold on each time they throw they like the spin around and where it goes is where it goes. Which is why I'm not going give you any cross reference numbes because that would take away the fun. You can't have fun if you look up the part numbers it just takes a lot of time it's boring and tedious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took these measurements to practice using this micrometer and work on my photography.  I have more work to do on the photography side I suppose.

The second picture measures the full length of the stem.  The other two capture the length of the arbor.577209847_2021-02-1407_34_49-Window.png.2adf2ca2cf22b61e3f82b24b7556f223.png

2021-02-14 07_36_21-Window.png

2021-02-14 07_35_15-Window.png

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK.  Perhaps I am wrong about "balance complete."  I will move along.

The watch is keeping good time on the bench.

I have the case and pushers, but only the sweep second hand.  I found a minute hand that was close enough so that I could monitor how well it is keeping time, but I need a real set of hands and a decision about the dial.

These chronographs were branded by lots of different companies. I see dials on Ebay and as best I can tell the feet are correct.  I don't want to sink a lot of money into it because this chronograph is not so popular.

Hey...its a project!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like your pictures and you're right the 51 and the 248 interchange exactly except? It appears to be that there were variations and because there are variations there are minimum of three different balance wheels that all interchange but not necessarily amongst themselves?

The loss of forgot to include something so I'm attaching another image notice something under remarks this watch was made for how many years? Between 1937 in 1970 that means that it was upgraded. Notice how in the technical description it says of all the parts interchange but notice in the spare parts list that there are three different balance wheels. So that means that a real life there probably is an interchangeability issue where conceivably everything does not interchange 100%.

Oh and the other problem with interchangeability is if somebody is played with a watch before you perhaps they modified or change something so then you have to fix whatever they modified unchanged perhaps

always interesting when cross-referencing parts to check multiple of sources. Like bestfit online I snipped out images for you.  so it appears to be there are limited number of balance completes but how many separate numbers do we have for balance staffs?. If I was really enthusiastic I go in the bestfit book which everybody should have any way if you doing  modern watches and you can look up the staff numbers and see why there is differences between all of them. But it is troubling that there appear to be more staff numbers and balance complete numbers?

 

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=LAN_51

balance complete three.JPG

balance complete two.JPG

balance complete one.JPG

remarks for 51.JPG

lan 51 x.JPG

lan 51 bestfit.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Oh...when in subjunctive mood, use "were" instead of "was." 

You need to improve your reading skills you not paying attention those mistakes were super minor what about the other ones that I make? Did you know you've never seen anything that I've typed? Everything is C is a product of dictation software and did you just noticed the C? Normally at have to correct that by hand typing it I did say everything you see and look what I got oh dear. Without dictation software I would never be on this group but it can be a pain in the ass. I'm going to assume the above mistake was my mistake but it does really strange things at times. On the other hand it set me free to answer questions and occasionally torture people on this group.

Then I'm not going to correct anything up above normal a? Okay I made one minor correction to this line. Like the word your up above it has you? Or the word normally as the letter a following it I don't recall saying that. Dictation software sucks but

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Michael1962 said:

Ok. I give in. I have no idea what that post is about.

It seems clear enough to me. John has difficulty typing. He uses dictation software, which isn't 100% reliable. The content of his posts is high-quality, if you take the trouble to re-read them (out loud If necessary). You might want to try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

You need to improve your reading skills you not paying attention those mistakes were super minor what about the other ones that I make? Did you know you've never seen anything that I've typed? Everything is C is a product of dictation software and did you just noticed the C? Normally at have to correct that by hand typing it I did say everything you see and look what I got oh dear. Without dictation software I would never be on this group but it can be a pain in the ass. I'm going to assume the above mistake was my mistake but it does really strange things at times. On the other hand it set me free to answer questions and occasionally torture people on this group.

Then I'm not going to correct anything up above normal a? Okay I made one minor correction to this line. Like the word your up above it has you? Or the word normally as the letter a following it I don't recall saying that. Dictation software sucks but

Just have a little fun with you John, because I knew you could take it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lots of rust on that hairspring Nev, would you even try to clean it up ?
    • How do you find the working distance from microscope lens to movement? Is it comfortable enough to get tools in?
    • Once you have the collet closer bits off, and the pulley off, there are two nuts on the spindle. These must be removed. There is a large nut in the back of the headstock with two holes, remove this with an appropriate wrench. The front large nut comes off too. The spindle now comes out- but wait- there's more! There is a spacer between the outer races of the bearings; the spindle will almost certainly come out "assembled" with both bearings and this spacer (it can actually come out front or back-ways with the large nuts off the headstock). You have to manage to press out the spindle from the rear bearing, get the spacer off, then remove the front bearing, now you can get to the key.   Imagining you get it all apart without causing any damage to the bearings, now the fun part starts. You must apply preload to the bearings, and this is a very tricky endeavor. Basically once you have the bearings back on, and are in the casting, you snug up the rear nut (one of the two) on the spindle, checking the play of the spindle with at least a 0.002mm reading indicator, until there is zero axial play, then just a little more, then snug up the second nut to lock things in place. Of course snugging up the second nut influences the preload, so you can go back and forth a few times to get it right. Too much preload and bearing life diminishes, too little, and you get poor performance, poor surface finishes, ball skidding, etc.   When I replaced the bearings in one of mine many years ago, I was surprised to find that the bearings were regular deep-groove bearings, but of a higher precision class than normal. I replaced with dimensionally identical angular contact bearings, class P4. In trying to set the preload, I just about lost my mind, so called Barden (the high precision arm of FAG bearing makers, and who made my new ones) and a nice engineer told me that the folks at Leinen were either crazy, or really good- he also said it's 100% A-OK to set up deep groove bearings with preload like this, but best is angular contact. In this bearing setup, the standard way to do it is to have a spacer between the outer races, and another between the inner races. Leinen has the former but not the latter, haha. His advice was to make an inner spacer. The trick is it has to be the exact same length as the outer spacer, within like a micron.  Then you just tighten everything up and the preload is set, because the bearings (the new ones) are ground in a way that they have proper preload in that situation. Easy. Sort of- if you have the means to make the other spacer!   Just to note- Schaublin does the preloading as Leinen did on these on their lathes using angular contact bearings. There is a procedure in the manual, where you tighten the nut until axial play is zero, then a certain number of degrees more. This works on their setup as the nut itself locks without a second nut, and they spent the time to figure it all out in a repeatable way.   I say all this not to scare you off from dismantling your headstock, just to give a heads-up what you're up against to get it back to where it was before.
    • Do, write a nice letter to Santa. I do all disassembly and assembly under the microscope. I consider it a necessity.
    • Yes Breguet overcoil, and A is OK, the damage is from B to the end. It should look lile this. The studd is fixed by the screw head into  the cut.
×
×
  • Create New...