Jump to content

French clock update


clockboy

Recommended Posts

I have spent many, many hours in my workshop restoring this clock after it arrived totally wrecked (see pic). There are still issues that need resolving. 1. the minute hand Is not correct and is just a modified hand that came with the clock and as yet I have still not found a replacement that fits. 2. The chiming sequence goes out of sequence now and again. The issue might be when in the strike mode it runs very, very fast so it might be skipping the count wheel, maybe !!!.. or The fly wheel bushings might need replacing!!!

However lessons learnt. When sticking alabaster together use epoxy glue BUT mix it with some alabaster powder. This hides the joins (almost) When replacing the pendulum the numbers found on the rear of the case are really useful. This particular clock has 4.8 and using the PDF (see attachment) it gave me the length required and also the BPM expected. Using the Clock master app on my iPhone it was almost spot on with regard to timekeeping. If careful spelter can be drilled and have a thread tapped into it. When gold leafing use fresh  size and after applying leave for at least 15 mins before attaching the leaf. To get a smooth finish I found my finger gave the best results.

 

BEFORE

IMG_5783.thumb.jpg.1f523acb54f61385b9716246e6728d0d.jpg

AFTER

IMG_6123.thumb.jpg.dbd444bee2b400d0cf309476e6e2e79d.jpg

FrenchClockBeatRates2.pdf.pdf.pdf

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude!  That's amazing!  I remember that original post where you showed the pictures of it arriving in pieces.  Your description of the restoration sounds both arduous and educational.  But the clock certainly has come a long way.  From the pics here, it looks like it was worth all the work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To hold the case furniture I used a small amount of epoxy putty.  To complete the joins I used epoxy resin. I then rubbed all of the case down with 2500 grit and a little water. I then polished with clear wax. 
 

ps the chiming issue is (I think)I removed the count wheel without marking its position so I will  have to remove and try in another position. However my wife loves the clock and doesn’t want me to remove it ☺️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, clockboy said:

To hold the case furniture I used a small amount of epoxy putty.  To complete the joins I used epoxy resin. I then rubbed all of the case down with 2500 grit and a little water. I then polished with clear wax. 
 

ps the chiming issue is (I think)I removed the count wheel without marking its position so I will  have to remove and try in another position. However my wife loves the clock and doesn’t want me to remove it ☺️

If you look carefully the square the count wheel fixes onto some have a mark on it for a guide for fitting it correctly.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/2/2020 at 11:39 AM, clockboy said:

I have spent many, many hours in my workshop restoring this clock after it arrived totally wrecked (see pic). There are still issues that need resolving. 1. the minute hand Is not correct and is just a modified hand that came with the clock and as yet I have still not found a replacement that fits. 2. The chiming sequence goes out of sequence now and again. The issue might be when in the strike mode it runs very, very fast so it might be skipping the count wheel, maybe !!!.. or The fly wheel bushings might need replacing!!!

However lessons learnt. When sticking alabaster together use epoxy glue BUT mix it with some alabaster powder. This hides the joins (almost) When replacing the pendulum the numbers found on the rear of the case are really useful. This particular clock has 4.8 and using the PDF (see attachment) it gave me the length required and also the BPM expected. Using the Clock master app on my iPhone it was almost spot on with regard to timekeeping. If careful spelter can be drilled and have a thread tapped into it. When gold leafing use fresh  size and after applying leave for at least 15 mins before attaching the leaf. To get a smooth finish I found my finger gave the best results.

 

BEFORE

IMG_5783.thumb.jpg.1f523acb54f61385b9716246e6728d0d.jpg

AFTER

IMG_6123.thumb.jpg.dbd444bee2b400d0cf309476e6e2e79d.jpg

FrenchClockBeatRates2.pdf.pdf.pdf 188.71 kB · 2 downloads

What a super job, well done!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a countwheel issue.  They are bastards, especially if a previous meddler has "manipulated" it.

You did an incredible job rebuilding the case!  Alabaster? Marble?

I was in vienna at a very fine clock shop where i bought a marble french portico clock.  It arrived at my house in the USA as pile of dust.  I was so upset!

Years ago i bought a late 1700's early 1800s alabaster clock that was in pieces in several boxes and glued it all back together.  I enjoyed that.

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it is annoying but that’s all part of the fun. The issue I have is my wife loves the clock and does not want me to remove it. Quote “I don’t count the chimes I just know it’s either half past or the hour”.

I will tackle the issue after the festive time. My only fear is that the count wheel is not the original one which will be a challenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As long as you don't grind the stuff up and blow it around, you should be fine. Use a dust mask if in doubt.   The things I'm very careful of are: Radium lume - even the stuff that is visually completely dead and inert is still highly radioactive; it's the fluorescent part that decays, not the radium. A single speck inhaled or ingested can cause cancer, so store parts in zip bags and wear a dust mask & wipe your work area down after handling anything that uses it. A proper geiger counter is a good investment if you plan on working with vintage watches, so you can check for it & take appropriate precautions.   "One dip" & equivalents - the original type & the generic PERC dry cleaning fluid (Tetrachloroethylene / perchloroethylene) which is what the original one dip was mostly made of. That's toxic, a known carcinogen. Use in very good ventilation only & keep it sealed whenever possible.   The newer B-Dip is presumably a safer replacement.  
    • Only 137% !  sounds like you're not putting enough effort in 😆.  I would think of it like cogs on pushbike.  Fastest speed to the spindle would be largest pulley wheel on the drive and smallest pulley wheel on the driven. If the motor was into a sliding bed you would have 3x4 ? Speeds.
    • So please we have that comment.    Eccentric59.  Great work.
    • Thanks @nevenbekriev. I did some further reading and I think I kinda understand it now. Basically, if you were to fully fill the entire barrel with a super-long mainspring, you can't actually wind it anymore. Hence zero power reserve. Likewise the other extreme (mainspring too short to be wound around the arbor). This explains in very basic turns why there is a sweet spot in the middle of the curve you drew. Importantly, this is relative to the barrel diameter (and arbor diameter). In other words, if you have a larger barrel you should have a longer mainspring and hence also longer power reserve. So Longines' statement isn't entirely wrong (longer mainspring = more power reserve). BUT you can only make the mainspring longer if you also increase the barrel diameter. Thanks again for making me think about this a bit more and learning something. That's why I love this forum!   However 😉, there is still some truth to what I said (I think! Please correct me if I'm wrong!): according to my reading, the key parameter is the share of the space between barrel arbor and barrel wall. Half of which should be occupied by the mainspring (based on Theory of Horology by WOSTEP, quote in depth here: https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/mainsprings.php).  The space occupied by the mainspring in the barrel is a simple function of mainspring length AND thickness.  This implies that increasing length, but keeping the same thickness, will lead to occupying too much of the barrel space and hence reducing power reserve. This is what @nevenbekriev 's drawing correctly shows. However, if you increase length AND decrease thickness in the correct ratio, you can maintain the correct mainspring proportion vis-a-vis the barrel (i.e. occupying half of the space between arbor and barrel wall).  This would indeed lead to an increase of the number of barrel revolutions (when unwinding) and hence a potential increase in power reserve. However, you loose torque. And a loss of torque will also lead to the watch stopping earlier (when torque can't overcome the friction in the gear train). Thus, these two opposing effects may cancel each other out. Which again makes this statement probably true:    FINALLY, we still want to help @Zendoc with his very concrete decision:  GR4485 (same thickness but shorter than original) or GR4477 (slightly thinner and a bit longer than original).  I would still advocate (considering modern lubricants and potentially stronger metal alloys -- and consequently the risk of knocking at full wind) to choose the latter.        
    • 🤔 I'd say it's more like.
×
×
  • Create New...