Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

I am attempting to service an old H. Williamson pocket watch movement and hit an obstacle before I even started. I know I'll need to disassemble the balance in order to oil the non-shock end stone but having watched one of Mark's newer videos advising on the danger of removing the end stone mounting screws while the balance cock is mounted, I'm wary of doing this. However, with the Breguet hairspring held to the cock with with its own screw-retained "carrier cock" (holding the pinned hairspring) instead of a stud carrier, also top-mounted, I don't know what's riskier? As you can see, this old 1918 movement is a work of art in itself and I'd hate to mess it up. My concern is also how I'd manage to reassemble the hairspring to the balance cock safely after servicing.

Do any of you know the safest "best practice" for disassembling and re-assembling such a balance please?

Thanks,
Adam

20201130_212806479_iOS.thumb.jpg.749f096d9d436582b19f97fe2bcfc6ac.jpg

20201130_232217191_iOS.jpg

Posted
2 minutes ago, AdamC said:

Hello,

I am attempting to service an old H. Williamson pocket watch movement and hit an obstacle before I even started. I know I'll need to disassemble the balance in order to oil the non-shock end stone but having watched one of Mark's newer videos advising on the danger of removing the end stone mounting screws while the balance cock is mounted, I'm wary of doing this. However, with the Breguet hairspring held to the cock with with its own screw-retained "carrier cock" (holding the pinned hairspring) instead of a stud carrier, also top-mounted, I don't know what's riskier? As you can see, this old 1918 movement is a work of art in itself and I'd hate to mess it up. My concern is also how I'd manage to reassemble the hairspring to the balance cock safely after servicing.

Do any of you know the safest "best practice" for disassembling and re-assembling such a balance please?

Thanks,
Adam

20201130_212806479_iOS.thumb.jpg.749f096d9d436582b19f97fe2bcfc6ac.jpg

20201130_232217191_iOS.jpg

I would just grab the complete balance cock and lift it out while tilting the movement to allow the balance to come out. The put the whole lot on a balance tack and loosen the screws. Then take the balance off the tack and support the balance on a metal block with holes to support the balance. Lower the balance cock / bridge for Americans:) so the hairspring has little tension and take the stud out. Now you have the balance bridge on its own to work in the upper cap jewel.

my guess:)

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, AdamC said:

Hello,

I am attempting to service an old H. Williamson pocket watch movement and hit an obstacle before I even started. I know I'll need to disassemble the balance in order to oil the non-shock end stone but having watched one of Mark's newer videos advising on the danger of removing the end stone mounting screws while the balance cock is mounted, I'm wary of doing this. However, with the Breguet hairspring held to the cock with with its own screw-retained "carrier cock" (holding the pinned hairspring) instead of a stud carrier, also top-mounted, I don't know what's riskier? As you can see, this old 1918 movement is a work of art in itself and I'd hate to mess it up. My concern is also how I'd manage to reassemble the hairspring to the balance cock safely after servicing.

Do any of you know the safest "best practice" for disassembling and re-assembling such a balance please?

Thanks,
Adam

20201130_212806479_iOS.thumb.jpg.749f096d9d436582b19f97fe2bcfc6ac.jpg

20201130_232217191_iOS.jpg

Like this

B7DCEDBF-4839-4BEC-86DF-0F2A4ADD55CF.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Seems a sensible approach jdrichard. Thanks, I'll probably give that a go tomorrow evening.

  • Like 1
Posted

No doubt removing the two little screws is the prefered approach and less risky with balance detached from the cock, since you would have more control an can push down on the screw as hard as needed, if placed on hard surface.

I can't see how stud is to be safely detached from this particular cock !!   with regular screw stud type, it is safer, if you loosen the stud screw when the cock and balance are still mounted on mainplate.

I usually put some penetrating oil on both little screws and attepmt the unscrew next day. 

Hope this helps.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

On a watch like that I will unscrew the stud with the balance and cock in the watch, then gently slide the stud off the cock. Unscrew cock and lift off, remove balance from movement. With the cock off set it on a bench block so you don't bend the pins while loosening the screws for the cap jewel. Then, on these American pieces, the hole jewel and cap jewel will normally press out (they are both mounted in an individual setting). They made star-like "jewel pushers" with different sized brass tips, but you can press them out with pegwood normally. If they are stubborn then best to use a jeweling tool (first choice), or a staking tool (second choice, be gentle).

  • Like 1
Posted

Nickelsilver, this sounds like a good approach too. Definitely a more tricky one to handle. By the way, this is not an American movement, it was made in Coventry, England. I’m not 100% sure but I think Smiths may have acquired H. Williamson a long time ago.

Posted
8 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

I can't see how stud is to be safely detached from this particular cock !!   with regular screw stud type, it is safer, if you loosen the stud screw when the cock and balance are still mounted on mainplate.

 

I see the stud screw now, so I just loosen it, unless the stud slides outward easy, DO NOT DIRECTLY PUSH ON THE STUD  AS YOU WOULD BE PUSHING ON BALANCE PIVOTS TOO, I use a pair of tweezers, hold the tweezers at 45 degree one arm push on the stud, another under stud holder. You just want to break the stud loose off of its hole, it can then be easily pushed out when the cock is removed, hold your hand about a cm above bench and drop the balance on tissue paper, cloth for low altitude soft landing. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, AdamC said:

Nickelsilver, this sounds like a good approach too. Definitely a more tricky one to handle. By the way, this is not an American movement, it was made in Coventry, England. I’m not 100% sure but I think Smiths may have acquired H. Williamson a long time ago.

Ah- in that case the cap jewel may well just lift out once the screws are removed.

 

Joe- the stud is just sitting on the cock, held by the screw. With the screw out it will just shift over off the cock, no danger. Similar studs were used on many high end pieces, particularly marine chronometers.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 hours ago, jdrichard said:

I would just grab the complete balance cock and lift it out while tilting the movement to allow the balance to come out. The put the whole lot on a balance tack and loosen the screws. Then take the balance off the tack and support the balance on a metal block with holes to support the balance. Lower the balance cock / bridge for Americans:) so the hairspring has little tension and take the stud out. Now you have the balance bridge on its own to work in the upper cap jewel.

my guess:)

This has worked well jdrichard using a slightly modified method. Once on the balance tack, I was able to loosen the hairspring carrier, move it aside, and then disengage the spring between the regulator pins. It then dropped down onto a soft landing below. Note, I used Rodico to prop and cushion the cock on the block to protect the regulator pins. But now to remove the jewel... Under high magnification, I can see the flange around the jewel but it won't shift. Tried ultrasonic clean in Renata Essence, and afterwards even using a very fine 0.50 bladed screwdriver it won't provide enough lever to shift it. I've tried coaxing with pegwood too but not even a wobble. Both upper and lower jewels are friction fitted hard into the cock plate so rather than persisting risking potential damage, I think I'd better stop now! I can see after the ultrasonic clean that the jewel looks clean now and I'm thinking of oiling through the jewel hole from the underside with my very fine incabloc oiler. Not ideal but the alternative could end in disaster!

20201201_225248142_iOS.jpg

20201201_225303768_iOS.jpg

20201201_225339401_iOS.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, AdamC said:

This has worked well jdrichard using a slightly modified method. Once on the balance tack, I was able to loosen the hairspring carrier, move it aside, and then disengage the spring between the regulator pins. It then dropped down onto a soft landing below. Note, I used Rodico to prop and cushion the cock on the block to protect the regulator pins. But now to remove the jewel... Under high magnification, I can see the flange around the jewel but it won't shift. Tried ultrasonic clean in Renata Essence, and afterwards even using a very fine 0.50 bladed screwdriver it won't provide enough lever to shift it. I've tried coaxing with pegwood too but not even a wobble. Both upper and lower jewels are friction fitted hard into the cock plate so rather than persisting risking potential damage, I think I'd better stop now! I can see after the ultrasonic clean that the jewel looks clean now and I'm thinking of oiling through the jewel hole from the underside with my very fine incabloc oiler. Not ideal but the alternative could end in disaster!

20201201_225248142_iOS.jpg

20201201_225303768_iOS.jpg

20201201_225339401_iOS.jpg

You should be able to push the jewel and it’s cap out by pushing from the lower side of the jewel with a flattened piece of peg wood. You need to align the jewel with a hole on your metal block and simply push down with the balance cock laying upside down on the metal block. I have actually used a stake in the past. Need to make sure that the peg wood stick or the stake pushes on the jewel setting and not the jewel. Also check that he fine edge that holds the jewel in is below the jewel and you can in fade push it out.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, jdrichard said:

You should be able to push the jewel and it’s cap out by pushing from the lower side of the jewel with a flattened piece of peg wood. You need to align the jewel with a hole on your metal block and simply push down with the balance cock laying upside down on the metal block. Need to make sure that the peg wood stick or the stake pushes on the jewel setting and not the jewel. Also check that he fine edge that holds the jewel in is below the jewel and you can in fact push it out.

Thank you, your technique has worked. After shaping the peg wood to the right diameter to avoid pressure on the jewel, with two firm pushes, the jewels dropped through the hole in the block. I could see then that they required cleaning for sure! After further cleaning before oiling and reassembly, would you recommend pushing them back in with peg wood or using a jeweling set? Sorry, this is quite advanced and new to me. I’m aware that they’ll need to be at the correct height/tolerance but I’d. imagine pushing fully home afterwards should be satisfactory (as long as I know they’re fully home).

F6205327-182E-45D2-ABC1-7AEA7BC2F99F.jpeg

Posted
4 hours ago, AdamC said:

Thank you, your technique has worked. After shaping the peg wood to the right diameter to avoid pressure on the jewel, with two firm pushes, the jewels dropped through the hole in the block. I could see then that they required cleaning for sure! After further cleaning before oiling and reassembly, would you recommend pushing them back in with peg wood or using a jeweling set? Sorry, this is quite advanced and new to me. I’m aware that they’ll need to be at the correct height/tolerance but I’d. imagine pushing fully home afterwards should be satisfactory (as long as I know they’re fully home).

F6205327-182E-45D2-ABC1-7AEA7BC2F99F.jpeg

I usually push the jewel in with peg wood , until it hits the lip and make sure it is level. Then I install the cap and at times I use a hollow stake or Jeweling set. The reason for not using the peg wood for the cap is that it is domed and you could damage that jewel in the setting. I have however done both with peg wood, if the cap jewel setting is fairly loose in the hole and can easily be pushed in. Befor you remove it, make or note a small witness mark si you can put it back into the exact same place.

  • Thanks 1
  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
    • I found a motor that is 3/4 hp and another that is 1.2hp. They come with speed controller. So I don’t think I would need a wiring diagram. But I sure appreciate you offering your help! Do you think 1.2 hp would be too much for a watchmaker’s lathe?
×
×
  • Create New...