Jump to content

404 Club


Recommended Posts

Bought this £4.00. I bought it because I read that Camy Geneve have good movements. This one doesn't reek quality to me, am I wrong? 20220523_163332.thumb.jpg.7564162e00338987c06a56a8761bd224.jpg

Just now, RichardHarris123 said:

Bought this £4.00. I bought it because I read that Camy Geneve have good movements. This one doesn't reek quality to me, am I wrong? 20220523_163332.thumb.jpg.7564162e00338987c06a56a8761bd224.jpg

 

20220523_163227.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Bought this £4.00. I bought it because I read that Camy Geneve have good movements. This one doesn't reek quality to me, am I wrong? 20220523_163332.thumb.jpg.7564162e00338987c06a56a8761bd224.jpg

 

20220523_163227.jpg

No Richard, you are quite correct Camy have always been a good quality brand. You do know what you have here though dont know 🤦‍♂️. I'm ever so pleased you only paid 4 quid for it though.

2 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

My says I'm crazy all the time.  Maybe we all are. 

Nah mate its just you, shes already told me 🤣

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Sounded rude but i left it like that anyway 🤪
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No Richard, you are quite correct Camy have always been a good quality brand. You do know what you have here though dont know 🤦‍♂️. I'm ever so pleased you only paid 4 quid for it though.

Nah mate its just you, shes already told me 🤣

She told me, she had appeased some crazy old bloke.  It most of been you. Hehe. 

 

As for the Camy, yes I know what I have.  I bought it without seeing the movement because it was £4. I wouldn't spend good money without seeing inside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

She told me, she had appeased some crazy old bloke.  It most of been you. Hehe. 

 

As for the Camy, yes I know what I have.  I bought it without seeing the movement because it was £4. I wouldn't spend good money without seeing inside. 

Haha appeased, yes mate its been a while since I've been appeased. Tell her thanks for the appeasement 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

She told me, she had appeased some crazy old bloke.  It most of been you. Hehe. 

 

As for the Camy, yes I know what I have.  I bought it without seeing the movement because it was £4. I wouldn't spend good money without seeing inside. 

I don't know whether to service it for the practice or hit it with a hammer.  The case is decent though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

This one doesn't reek quality to me, am I wrong?

Well it depends. The basic movement is fine, but this looks like the last gasp of the FHF 9X series ( I think it is probably an FHF 97)

Earlier versions were much better engineered, but by the time this variant came out, probably around 1980 the quartz crisis had taken hold, and the engineering was being "en-cheapened" as much as possible.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?13&ranfft&2&2uswk&FHF_97

If you clean and service it, it will probably run reasonably well (assuming it hasn't been previously butchered in the back streets of Mumbai of course).

Is it, or was it ever associated in any way with "Camy"? Probably not, but it does have a certain charm and was, in my opinion worth the not very much you paid for it.

"Swiss Made"? Kinda, sorta, maybe, but with a slightly spicy past.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Well it depends. The basic movement is fine, but this looks like the last gasp of the FHF 9X series ( I think it is probably an FHF 97)

Earlier versions were much better engineered, but by the time this variant came out, probably around 1980 the quartz crisis had taken hold, and the engineering was being "en-cheapened" as much as possible.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?13&ranfft&2&2uswk&FHF_97

If you clean and service it, it will probably run reasonably well (assuming it hasn't been previously butchered in the back streets of Mumbai of course).

Is it, or was it ever associated in any way with "Camy"? Probably not, but it does have a certain charm and was, in my opinion worth the not very much you paid for it.

"Swiss Made"? Kinda, sorta, maybe, but with a slightly spicy past.

I still quite like it. It's actually running well. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting coincidence a friend brought me an FHF96N for a service. Running very well (with a bit of beat error of 9ms) despite it was not serviced like probably ever, just by adding a bit of lubrication. Lubricating of the balance jewel is going to be an issue for me though, look at the "shock spring"! 🙂 I might need to do it from the "other side". As far as I know he could also put it into the 404 club, he said postage was more that the watch itself.

IMG_0237.JPG

IMG_0238.JPG

IMG_20220524_102347.jpg

 

IMG_20220524_103009.jpg\

ps.: its not cleaned and serviced yet, with a full wind it was running ~1,5 days. Going to attempt a service and a beat error correction.

Edited by luiazazrambo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, luiazazrambo said:

Interesting coincidence a friend brought me an FHF96N for a service. Running very well (with a bit of beat error of 9ms) despite it was not serviced like probably ever, just by adding a bit of lubrication. Lubricating of the balance jewel is going to be an issue for me though, look at the "shock spring"! 🙂 I might need to do it from the "other side". As far as I know he could also put it into the 404 club, he said postage was more that the watch itself.

IMG_0237.JPG

IMG_0238.JPG

IMG_20220524_102347.jpg

IMG_20220524_103009.jpg

Wow, a genuine Oris. I wouldn't like to try and lift the shock springs either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Wow, a genuine Oris. I wouldn't like to try and lift the shock springs either. 

Im not so sure that Oris ever used the st96. Oris were dependent up until 1970 when they were sold to asaug. And then became independent again in the early 80s. I have dozens of Oris watches  not one of them has anything but a genuine marked Oris calibre inside. Its extremely unlikely that asaug used another swiss movement in the 12 years that they ran Oris, why would they ? Oris had a decent reputation for in house movements. I think we have another Mumbai here. The st96 is used extensively in India. Lots of them, cheap and easy to work on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got this for free with some other watches.  It was free for a very obvious reason.  The dial, hands etc nearly fooled me. Hehe. 

Decent movement, I'll do something with the dial. 

20220525_171637.jpg

20220525_171617.jpg

55 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I got this for free with some other watches.  It was free for a very obvious reason.  The dial, hands etc nearly fooled me. Hehe. 

Decent movement, I'll do something with the dial. 

20220525_171637.jpg

20220525_171617.jpg

Is this a genuine crown though? 

56 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

though

20220525_181334.thumb.jpg.f27baef6b928c8c847053df334f4c049.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The movement is a new one on me. PRIM 68 (I think).

Interesting that the Chinese didn't invent the counterfeit Rolex. I have one with a nice ETA 2789 inside.

19 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I'll do something with the dial

Are you planning to modify it somehow?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

PRIM 68 (I think).

Interesting. Another movement maker I didn't know about. -> http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Prim_68_3

They are still around apparently. -> https://www.prim.cz/our-history

Furthermore they seem to do some interesting watches with their own in house movements.

https://www.prim.cz/watches?filter[tags_0][]=1

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Interesting. Another movement maker I didn't know about. -> http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Prim_68_3

They are still around apparently. -> https://www.prim.cz/our-history

Furthermore they seem to do some interesting watches with their own in house movements.

https://www.prim.cz/watches?filter[tags_0][]=1

Looks a decent movement.  Running well but needs a service. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

I'll do something with the dial

I like the dial. It looks quite reasonable quality, and may be the original Prim dial, just overprinted with Rolex etc. I would keep it as is, its an interesting conversation piece, and its not as if changing the dial is going to add value to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

The movement is a new one on me. PRIM 68 (I think).

Interesting that the Chinese didn't invent the counterfeit Rolex. I have one with a nice ETA 2789 inside.

Are you planning to modify it somehow?

 

Yes I need to do something with the dial.  I gave it a quick xlean last night hoping the lettering would come of but no.

1 minute ago, AndyHull said:

I like the dial. It looks quite reasonable quality, and may be the original Prim dial, just overprinted with Rolex etc. I would keep it as is, its an interesting conversation piece, and its not as if changing the dial is going to add value to it.

Pictures with glass off, yes a decent dial. Crap hands.

20220525_182458.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prim started off making a copy of the Lip R25 which they called the Prim 52 so far as I can tell.

image.png.5c9720bc5a2951232b16fe23267b74bd.png

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Lip_R25

 

image.png.6116fae5e93366cc752fecba08482d7a.png

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Prim_52

They then seem to have gone on to develop their own movements.

If you want to upgrade the hands, ranff lists the sizes for the PRIM 68 as

Hands
1.40 x 0.80 x 0.18mm

I suspect the originals will respond well to a gentle polish though.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AndyHull said:

Prim started off making a copy of the Lip R25 which they called the Prim 52 so far as I can tell.

image.png.5c9720bc5a2951232b16fe23267b74bd.png

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Lip_R25

 

image.png.6116fae5e93366cc752fecba08482d7a.png

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Prim_52

They then seem to have gone on to develop their own movements.

If you want to upgrade the hands, ranff lists the sizes for the PRIM 68 as

Hands
1.40 x 0.80 x 0.18mm

I suspect the originals will respond to a gentle polish though.

Probably, the second hand is loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picked this up in a lot of 3 total. It was $10 U.S. for all. There was a Bulova 10AX movement that I needed for parts, a Timex Electronic (which I'm working on) and this: a nice little Orient Crystal.  It's a nice, smooth-running automatic with day & date.  Thank heaven it keeps such excellent time, because it is so quiet I can't hear it ticking at all.  I haven't had it on a timegrapher yet but it's been running for a few days now and I can't tell if it's off even by a second.  I will always prefer pocket watches, but this wrist watch can be one of my exceptions. 

IMG_20220527_213339.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2022 at 6:31 AM, AndyHull said:

Furthermore they seem to do some interesting watches with their own in house movements.

https://www.prim.cz/watches?filter[tags_0][]=1

Interesting indeed... They've got an automatic full calendar cam actuated chronograph (looks for all the world like a 7750 base, but they claim manufacture, which is pretty common if they so much as polish a screw for themselves these days) for a pretty reasonable price (€4K). At least I assume that's reasonable... I'm not a fan of the 7750, or calendar chronographs, so I don't really track prices of those sorts of things.

Edited by spectre6000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looks like it is only dirt. If rust, then this means the strenght of the spring is reduced in places with rust, so the spring is damaged and useless. Only light surface rust, which is rather residual from other places activity of rust can be cleaned, and no chemicals that can etch the metals of the spring aloy should be used
    • Hello, I'm after some help on getting a functional tool for removing and replacing case tubes, the friction fit type not the threaded type. I have previously owned two Chinese Ali Express tools, which worked, but in each case after using on a watch case with an angled case the watch the case had to be manually held perpendicular and when this angle was not perfectly aligned the pusher pin inevitably received a slight side load and the tool body was damaged. Due to the fact that the hole which holds the pusher pin is so close to the end of the block and the material wall is so thin: The result was that the hard pusher pin stretched and deformed the hole and the pusher pin was then slack and no longer perpendicular, and eventually the material split altogether. After I looked at the tool I realised that the block the hole was machined into was aluminum, this coupled with the extremely thin wall made this hole very weak and prone to the deformation and damage I had experienced. I looked to another reputable supplier (see below) who advertised their tool as "all steel" and I even contacted their customer support who confirmed that the block in question was made of steel. I was very disappointed yesterday when it arrived and found that it was in fact aluminum and not steel as promised. I could tell by the feel of the material (weight) and confirmed with a magnet which would not 'stick' and have since requested a return/refund. Assuming the return/refund goes smoothly, I am still left with my original problem of not having a tube pusher tool - does anyone have any recommendation for a tool which will work and will also stand the test of time?
    • Drilling is going to be difficult, firstly because the drill bits are so thin and brittle, expect to break a few. The second issue is access to the 'hole', as the other lug will be in the way, meaning that you will have to drill at a slight angle, putting a bending stress on the drill bit and with the slightest drop in concentration .... and back to my first point. I would be tempted to grind them flat with a Dremel type tool or small jewelers file, and then put a center punch in the center of the bit to be drilled so the drill bit doesn't skip around and break... but expect this to be slow and frustrating work. By the time you have done 4 of these you'll be an expert and can come back and tell us all the best way to do it if you go down this route. However, I would seriously consider What @watchweasol said and drill from the outside-in, this will ensure straight holes without having to work around the other lugs. It may be worthwhile making yourself a simple paper template so you can be sure to match the position of each hole before drilling. In the end you will be left with 4 holes on the outside of the lugs, but many cases are made this way and unless you are looking for it you probably won't notice or realise that it's not the way the watch was meant to be in the first place.
    • What works for me (waiting for the villagers to assemble with torches and pitchforks) is to put a liberal (in watch terms) spot of 9010 on one of the pins of the pin pallet, this seems to improve amplitude and beat error.
    • Non-magnetic is a poor description of such a hairspring. A better description would be unmagnetisable hairspring. There are metals and alloys that are attracted to magnets, but don’t become magnetised themselves. A hairspring made out such a material will be attracted to magnetised tweezers, but will not become magnetised. These hairsprings can be disrupted by being in close proximity to a magnet, but the disruption will cease the moment the magnet is moved away. These are hairsprings that could conceivably be disrupted by a magnetised hairspring stud. Best Regards, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...