Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Can we divide job lot prices into equal amounts and pick the best watch from it. Or is that cheating? 

That is allowed. The "rules" are pretty flexible.  (i.e. there are no real hard and fast rules).
Postage should be "reasonable", whatever that means to you. I would draw the line at £1000.00 postage on a £4.00 Rolex, but that is up to you. I have bent the rules slightly on occasions, so  a £5.00 watch with free postage would be within the spirit of the rules I would suggest. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Lol! The joke of the 404 moniker is the HTTP response status code "Not found" (all credit to Andy on that one), and it's already priced in Queeniebucks. Convert from there to your currency of choice; it's about 5 Freedombucks at the moment.

Believe it or not, you have it much easier due to cultural reasons. We tend to throw out old things much more freely here, and lack the industrial/technological romance you guys have. Additionally, America's cultural/economic party trick has always been taking some bougie thing, and figuring out a way to make it mass produceable and inexpensive. That can lead to some super awesome things (it's actually one of the reasons for my daily wear watch), but also leads to a lot of cheap crap.

Shipping here from abroad can be quite inexpensive if there are favorable trade policies in place, but it can just as easily be much more expensive since everything either has to hitch a ride on a boat or plane. Russia used to be a good source of inexpensive watches, but that has obviously evaporated. Last time I looked, pickin's weren't just slim, but nil. Inflation isn't helping the matter at all either (which is worldwide in case anyone feels the need to blame their favorite local politician).

I tend to find the most interesting watches in the UK, but shipping has always been $30/£25 or so, which doesn't meet my standard of "reasonable" for these purposes. I've done plenty of looking in various European countries, but there seems to be a general unwillingness to ship to the US. During the pandemic, shipping from Germany on a pair of watches I bought was quoted at $5 or something, but then ended up being $60 before it actually made it here (transaction mutually cancelled on that one). 

Posted
1 hour ago, spectre6000 said:

Believe it or not, you have it much easier due to cultural reasons.

Its fairly cheap to live here, medical bills are non existant if you are prepared to wait to have anything treated. But that is slowly changing and we may not have that for too much longer. My policy is look after yourself and just dont get ill !     And houseing area taxes arnt too bad either. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Its fairly cheap to live here, medical bills are non existant if you are prepared to wait to have anything treated. But that is slowly changing and we may not have that for too much longer. My policy is look after yourself and just dont get ill !     And houseing area taxes arnt too bad either. 

Hehe.  For you Americans or any other nationally, National Insurance is meant to pay for health care, including dentistry.  My National insurance has just increased but I can't get to see a GP or a dentist. Waste of money as far as I'm concerned m

Posted
9 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Hehe.  For you Americans or any other nationally, National Insurance is meant to pay for health care, including dentistry.  My National insurance has just increased but I can't get to see a GP or a dentist. Waste of money as far as I'm concerned m

Haha. Rich try asking an American how much his health care is. NI is also for our pension if thats still around by the time we reach pension age.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Haha. Rich try asking an American how much his health care is. NI is also for our pension if thats still around by the time we reach pension age.

Hehe again.  I'm 54 and I've got about £5000 in my pension fund, I'm working until death.  True definition of mortgage,until death, mort means death. I'm working until I die.

Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Hehe again.  I'm 54 and I've got about £5000 in my pension fund, I'm working until death.  True definition of mortgage,until death, mort means death. I'm working until I die.

Haha behave you wally are you drinking and getting all meloncholey with yourself ? Stop being all woe is me lol 😄

47 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Hehe again.  I'm 54 and I've got about £5000 in my pension fund, I'm working until death.  True definition of mortgage,until death, mort means death. I'm working until I die.

Look on the bright side you can pull 25% from your fund soon, so youll have 1250.00 to go buy yourself a nice second hand swanky lathe to start repairing more watches with. 👍

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Posted

AsPurchased-l1600.thumb.jpg.a56c2b63026f90ee5ec1b93f84f90ef2.jpg

AsPurchasedRear-l1600.thumb.jpg.075273bd76b6d4339e68b60e24c28323.jpg

I may have mentioned before that 'you can't have too many multimeters' and others here have hinted that there is no such thing as too  many watches, so why not combine both.

A volt meter in a metal pocket watch case, with what looks suspiciously like possibly an asbestos infused flying lead.

I'm pretty sure this would fail petty much every part of every electrical safety standard the world over.

Time to don the hazmat suit and the rubber gloves perhaps.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

16V max. is good for car batteries and their voltage regulator. So no need for rubber gloves 😉

Edited by Kalanag
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

So no need for rubber gloves 

Its going to get pretty toasty if you short out a car battery with it. OK It isn't likely to melt or burst into flames.. at least not instantly, but it will get pretty hot. I suspect if you stick it onto a tractor battery or a substantial LiPo pack, you could melt it (or set fire to the battery in the case of the LiPo). I guess the rubber gloves would hide your fingerprints when they start inspecting the evidence.

I do wonder what its purpose was. Maybe someone was using it in a garage, or perhaps with a model railway or some other low voltage application. It does look pretty Heath Robinson, so I doubt if it was a commercial offering, more like something someone threw together out of junk they had lying around.

I found a picture of my commercially produced "Pocket Voltmeter" from around the 1940s.

image.thumb.png.7a77d415721f3a1079e1e705ec3e86c4.png

As you can see, there is a certain similarity, although the commercial offering is not made of conductive material.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted (edited)

Well that was an interesting rabbit hole to dive into.

image.png.addd62933e77983c02c7d9b994596b1a.png

 

Apparently there were similar commercial offerings for "Pocket Voltmeters" in what look suspiciously like pocket watch cases.

Source -> https://www.radiomuseum.org/r/unknown_jt_voltmeter_pocket_meter_jt.html#

I wonder if this was due to the ready availability of old stock pocket watch cases in the 1930s and 1940s.

5 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

Here I would use rubber gloves 😉

.. and maybe a dust mask. That also looks suspiciously like an asbestos clad cable. Having said that, I  grew up using a clothes iron that with the benefit of hindsight obviously had an asbestos jacketed cable and it doesn't seem to have finished me off, so far. The switch gear in our old cooker, and even the stove pipe were also asbestos back in the day.

"Radio Voltmenter".. makes sense. the low voltage would be to check filament voltages and the higher range would be to check B+ for the tubes. I still would be pretty wary of poking around in a valve set with a metal meter. 

Edited by AndyHull
Posted
21 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Its fairly cheap to live here, medical bills are non existant if you are prepared to wait to have anything treated. But that is slowly changing and we may not have that for too much longer. My policy is look after yourself and just dont get ill !     And houseing area taxes arnt too bad either. 

I was referring solely to finding cheap watches. No other social commentary intended, or even considered as being interpreted as an intent.

11 hours ago, AndyHull said:

AsPurchased-l1600.thumb.jpg.a56c2b63026f90ee5ec1b93f84f90ef2.jpg

AsPurchasedRear-l1600.thumb.jpg.075273bd76b6d4339e68b60e24c28323.jpg

I may have mentioned before that 'you can't have too many multimeters' and others here have hinted that there is no such thing as too  many watches, so why not combine both.

A volt meter in a metal pocket watch case, with what looks suspiciously like possibly an asbestos infused flying lead.

I'm pretty sure this would fail petty much every part of every electrical safety standard the world over.

Time to don the hazmat suit and the rubber gloves perhaps.

Congrats on posting the coolest thing I've seen... possibly this entire year. Did you snag that as a 404?

Posted
11 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Congrats on posting the coolest thing I've seen... possibly this entire year. Did you snag that as a 404?

Thanks. Yes, it cost the princely sum of £2.50 plus postage.

Posted
6 hours ago, spectre6000 said:
On 5/8/2022 at 7:04 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

 

I was referring solely to finding cheap watches. No other social commentary intended, or even considered as being interpreted as an intent.

Ok sorry lol. I thought it was a diverse comment on public economics. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

AsPurchasedDial2-l1600.thumb.jpg.121f6824ff6f1297cfb8641d55f9932a.jpg

AsPurchasedDial-l1600.thumb.jpg.79c935cfd81c74981118ad9780290525.jpg

AsPurchasedMechanism1-l1600.thumb.jpg.504b3b3ca3e197eef2e082a6ba29f6a0.jpg

AsPurchasedMechanism2-l1600.thumb.jpg.ffad687256d91bd84d7bcce685e85ec6.jpg

AsPurchasedMechanism3-l1600.thumb.jpg.65056b085af3291dec4d74317415478f.jpg

Unknown manufacturer ladies pin set cylinder movement in running condition (according to the listing).

The dial is in very nice condition, with only a slight hairline crack around the 9 o'clock mark. I'm pretty certain i have a minute hand, or a pair of hands to fit it.

Not sure who made it, possibly LeCoultre, but realistically it could be anybody. LeCoultre keep their database of serial numbers an in house, closely guarded secret. Well they will share information on individual movements for hard cash of course, but I'm not about to send them 260 Swiss Francs just to find out that my hunch is correct, since this item came well within the rules of the 404 club.

Posted
18 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Known as a five bar cylinder movement. They are French/Swiss made know to be made some place on the the border of the two countries. 

It is reasonably well finished, and unlike a couple of similar scrap movements I have, this one has a serial number, suggesting it was produced by a volume producer. That doesn't make it a LeCoultre, as similar movements were produced in large numbers, by a number of manufacturers at the time,  but it does suggest it wasn't a small back street operation. All of this is mere speculation of course. As a manufacturer, you can stamp any number you like on them obviously.

The 1 and the 7 of the serial number appear to be stamped harder than the other four digits, so maybe they were done in a separate operation and the other digits added elsewhere in production, who knows.

Whatever the story, it is a neat little piece of watch making engineering history, and if it runs, for two pounds fifty, I'm hardly going to complain.

Posted

I have seen some really nice dials on these movements. Its funny there must be thousands of these movement around but you cannot interchange any of the parts they are all individual which tells me they were not made on a factory production level.   

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I have seen some really nice dials on these movements. Its funny there must be thousands of these movement around but you cannot interchange any of the parts they are all individual which tells me they were not made on a factory production level.   

I also get the feeling that the movements were often hacked about a bit to get them to fit whatever cases were available.

If you look at the bridges in the 3rd and 4th picture it appears that two of the bridges and one screw have been "reduced" probably with a file, presumably to allow the thing to fit in the case. This does seem a little crude, and again suggests that this may not have been a top tier manufacturer, but then again, knowing what I do about industry...  deadlines to meet, corners get cut. Quite literally in this case.

15 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

This is what I did with one of them.

Nice. Both Weetabix and Mars bars entered production in 1932. Well there's something I didn't know before.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted
3 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

I also get the feeling that the movements were often hacked about a bit to get them to fit whatever cases were available.

If you look at the bridges in the 3rd and 4th picture it appears that two of the bridges and one screw have been "reduced" probably with a file, presumably to allow the thing to fit in the case. This does seem a little crude, and again suggests that this may not have been a top tier manufacturer, but then again, knowing what I do about industry...  deadlines to meet, corners get cut. Quite literally in this case.

It could be an after market adaption. 

4 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

I also get the feeling that the movements were often hacked about a bit to get them to fit whatever cases were available.

If you look at the bridges in the 3rd and 4th picture it appears that two of the bridges and one screw have been "reduced" probably with a file, presumably to allow the thing to fit in the case. This does seem a little crude, and again suggests that this may not have been a top tier manufacturer, but then again, knowing what I do about industry...  deadlines to meet, corners get cut. Quite literally in this case.

Nice. Both Weetabix and Mars bars entered production in 1932. Well there's something I didn't know before.

We didn't either.  The mother in law loved it. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 

AsPurchasedDial2-l1600.thumb.jpg.183779a12f91ee0e3e4fba4df0ded972.jpg

AsPurchasedMechanism-l1600.thumb.jpg.48dd4f180e9809bbfaa225061d2c524b.jpgAnother basket case on its way. This time it is a Kienzle (050/04) pocket watch from ca. 1955.

Allegedly the balance is good, but it has no hands (well actually part of the hour hand remains) and no crystal.

The dial looks like it might prove a bit of challenge too. Lets see if I can get it looking presentable again.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted
5 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

 

AsPurchasedDial2-l1600.thumb.jpg.183779a12f91ee0e3e4fba4df0ded972.jpg

AsPurchasedMechanism-l1600.thumb.jpg.48dd4f180e9809bbfaa225061d2c524b.jpgAnother basket case on its way. This time it is a Kienzle (050/04) pocket watch from ca. 1955.

Allegedly the balance is good, but it has no hands (well actually part of the hour hand remains) and no crystal.

The dial looks like it might prove a bit of challenge too. Lets see if I can get it looking presentable again.

I'm looking forward to seeing it, it couldn't look much worse.

Posted
1 hour ago, AndyHull said:

 

AsPurchasedDial2-l1600.thumb.jpg.183779a12f91ee0e3e4fba4df0ded972.jpg

AsPurchasedMechanism-l1600.thumb.jpg.48dd4f180e9809bbfaa225061d2c524b.jpgAnother basket case on its way. This time it is a Kienzle (050/04) pocket watch from ca. 1955.

Allegedly the balance is good, but it has no hands (well actually part of the hour hand remains) and no crystal.

The dial looks like it might prove a bit of challenge too. Lets see if I can get it looking presentable again.

I'm not sure who is the basket case the watch or you. 🤣

  • Haha 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
×
×
  • Create New...