Jump to content

Beginner Next Watch Movement


Recommended Posts

Good day, all. 

I've completed Mark's coursework 1-3, and I've torn down and reassembled the ETA/Unitas 6497-1 a few times.  I feel comfortable with the pocketwatch's somewhat oversized components.

Could you direct me to a logical second movement to obtain for practice purposes?  I'm not too familiar with date complications, so I'd prefer it be an equivalent of the 6497 (similar components and no date complication/s), but of wristwatch size.  I would not be adverse to a center seconds hand.   

Thank you as usual. 

Larry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SparkyLB said:

Could you direct me to a logical second movement to obtain for practice purposes?

What is that you like? Get that or similar if too expensive, maybe just not a chrono yet. A complete watch that you can then wear would be ideal IMO, you did good with Mark's and now deserve a reward..

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m going to suggest, only because it’s was the first automatic I worked on, a Seiko 6309. They are abundant in basic watches, have a very simple automatic winding mech and pretty straight forward keyless, no unruly springs to ping off into oblivion and unless they are completely beat up you can achieve good results.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: I'm a deep end guy. I learn to swim on the kitchen floor (read like crazy until I feel comfortable), then just jump in. 

Date complications are tiddlywinks. Nothing to be remotely concerned with. The only thing you might hold off on is something you care about breaking. A chronograph is complicated, but if you're careful and pay close attention, it's not at all impossible.

The approach I backed into mostly because shipping hasn't been all that timely during the pandemic is to fiddle around with what's to hand. I had a collection of crappy old watches that I accumulated years ago; cheap junk, because it's what I could afford in college. Mostly eBay type stuff I thought looked OK at the time, or things that came in lots with other things I actually wanted... That sort of stuff. Nicest and most complicated watch I've messed with out of that lot is a 7S26B Seiko 5 that was broken in a car wreck. Turned out not to be so broken, so I'm actually trying to make it run. Automatic, day, date, center seconds... The only thing that's given me headache is the mainspring barrel was a pain to split and I ended up warping it a bit (I had a spare badly running 7S26C, so lesson learned, part salvaged, moving on), and I roached the hair spring up good. I managed to screw the second hair spring up a bit as well, but I'm not calling it dead yet. The only things that gave me any issue at all are in no way specific or even related to automatic or day/date functionality.

@AndyHull has been playing a game he calls the "404 Club" (I think it refers specifically to a group of watches in his collection, but I'd almost go so far as to advocate it become A Thing™). @FLwatchguy73 and I have been dabbling a bit with the challenge as well. The premise is finding watches for £4.04 (currently $5.08/€4.52) and having fun (it's a hobby after all!). So far, I've managed to score a handful (ten or so) of French and Swiss watches, all fully jeweled (17+)... Well... Mostly... Still waiting on shipping. If I screw any of them up beyond any usability or parts salvageability, I'll be out an absolute max of $15 including shipping. Cheap experience.

That experience moves quickly. The first "modern" watch I dis/reassembled was a Tongji, and I had a **BLEEP** of a time manipulating the shock springs. Last night, I popped the shock springs on and off the Seiko a handful of times with no issues, and first attempt each time. Elapsed working time between the two couldn't have been more than 5 hours (though it's taken me weeks trying to find time with a newborn, two tech professionals working on what has literally become the bandwidth equivalent of an unreliable dial up internet connection, and a pandemic). 

Jump in. Break shit. Learn. Move on.

Edited by spectre6000
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all VERY much for the detailed answers.  I've looked at the EB8800 and it looks good for what I'm looking for.  On the other hand, the whole "dive in and break stuff" mentality is just fine if the movement is inexpensive.  I just know it's time to get off pocketwatches. 

I'll have a look at the Seiko 6309.

I'm grateful to have a forum that is so helpful.  Thanks a bunch, all! 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...