Jump to content

Mindboggling


Recommended Posts

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750. In the same listing you have the same exact movement for a fraction of the price. People have no clue what inside of a watch these days. 9fee507362a03afa65008df63b3a9d6a.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bjd1020 said:

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750.

That is only an asking price, it's common to see exaggeratedly high ones for any kind of item. If you want the see the actual going price search for completed sales.
Anyway to me paying more than $1,000 for a 7750 watch just because is made by a sub-brand of the other one that makes mature men drool is craziness already. I have for sale an nice Swiss, brand new 7750 from a popular but not-so-lucky maker and it will be hard to less for $800.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bjd1020 said:

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750. In the same listing you have the same exact movement for a fraction of the price. People have no clue what inside of a watch these days.

Maybe I misunderstand your post. "Normal people" don't by a watch primarily for its movement. What matters is the brand and what it looks like. You can buy a new Breitling for $4000 housing an ETA 2824-2 (albeit decorated and chronometer).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

 You can buy a new Breitling for $4000 housing an ETA 2824-2 (albeit decorated and chronometer).

Breitling, like IWC and others that I don't care to mention here is another  notorious "overcharger" which bases sales on active lifestyle sponsorships and advertising - they deliver little innovation beside casemaking. Most people would not even care to know that for the same money you can buy a bespoken automatic watch, designed and produced  in house during this decade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

"Normal people" don't by a watch primarily for its movement. What matters is the brand and what it looks like

What I find interesting is on the other end of the price scale. Five dollar plastic quartz watches in cases that somebody spent a couple hundred dollars for because they like the way it looked or the like the brand name and they don't care because nobody bothered to tell them that their watch inside is worth five dollars. After all If your A watch salesman why would you tell someone what's inside the watch your there to make money.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find interesting is on the other end of the price scale. Five dollar plastic quartz watches in cases that somebody spent a couple hundred dollars for because they like the way it looked or the like the brand name and they don't care because nobody bothered to tell them that their watch inside is worth five dollars. After all If your A watch salesman why would you tell someone what's inside the watch your there to make money.
Exactly. Maybe thats more the point I was trying to make. I dont think people understand the differences in terms of value that goes inside the watch they are wearing. The history on the whole watch movement industry from the 50s to now with the consolidation is quite a story.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is only an asking price, it's common to see exaggeratedly high ones for any kind of item. If you want the see the actual going price search for completed sales.
Anyway to me paying more than $1,000 for a 7750 watch just because is made by a sub-brand of the other one that makes mature men drool is craziness already. I have for sale an nice Swiss, brand new 7750 from a popular but not-so-lucky maker and it will be hard to less for $800.
Id say once you get past $1000 unless the watch has gold or diamonds youve pretty much exceeded the value of the best 7750s in my opinion.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole question of price is based on brand names, the bigger the brand the greater the price. The same can be said at the other end of the scale  the greater profit is a cheap movement in a flash big brand case. The average watch buyer knows nothing about the mechanics of the watch only that it carries an in you face  big brand and by that has street cred. But as Old Hippy says its their money and if they want to spend it on a flash watch with no guts that's their problem. They only get disapointed when it stops and Mr watchmaker  tells them it cant be fixed and the answer then is I paid £££££s for that watch. Up till then is just bling on the wrist.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
×
×
  • Create New...