Jump to content

Brac 117 Mainspring Barrel looks odd


Recommended Posts

Hi all. Working on my favourite type vintage watch, an old pin pellet - I just love the sound they make. A friend of mine said I sound like I’ve got a bomb strapped to my wrist when wearing one! [emoji51]

 

Anyway, this one is a Brac 117, which is an automatic. When I opened up the barrel, I found that the mainspring was tethered in place by a pin, which judging by the file marks and quality of the brazing I feel this is a bit of bodgeneering retrospectively carried out for one reason or other. The quality of the job aside, aren’t automatics supposed to have a bridle on the end of the mainspring to allow it to grip the barrel internal diameter and break away smoothly when fully wound?

 

Let’s see some pictures to clarify my above rantings

 

3553bf6c6d6ddc95641527a166c8df3f.jpg

 

 

016cb7afba215f293c9fada807a07601.jpg

206b14bf1b7d95f4776e19db81ed075e.jpg

 

What are your thoughts please? Has it been bodged, or is it supposed to be crudely pinned like that?

 

Kind regards

Deggsie

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love seeing a bit of bodgery... Just when I think I've seen it all, something even more mind blowing turns up!

I agree with the others, the very nature of an automatic is for the mainspring to slip, so as not to put ridiculous torque and pressure on reduction/reversing wheels, which would be unable to move once this spring is fully wound. In fact, the rotor surely wouldn't move once it was at full wind.

Thanks for showing us it Deggsie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amazing thing to me is this was a difficult bodge/fix when a new mainspring and or barrel would have been the best route and maybe easier. I admire the watchmaker that did this because it is a skill I bet he/she has employed before and maybe many times before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DavidMasters said:

The amazing thing to me is this was a difficult bodge/fix when a new mainspring and or barrel would have been the best route and maybe easier. I admire the watchmaker that did this because it is a skill I bet he/she has employed before and maybe many times before.

I know the place they do this. Seen lots of watches coming from the same place or country . Glue and paper and all sorts of bodges and tricks to make a watch run just enough to make it sell . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your quick responses gentlemen . You all seem to concur that it’s a repair of sorts, which seems logical, and I agree David it was quite a difficult fix in lieu of swapping the spring/barrel. When fully wound, the rotor did indeed lock up. I will try to research the correct spring but if anyone has the specification I’d be grateful. Thanks all and keep safe. Kind regards, Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for finding this. It’s very overpriced and as I’m in the Uk the freight charge also tops it out as prohibitive. When I look closely some parts are missing so it may be out of the frying pan and into the fire if I buy this. Most of my watches are only a few pounds, that way if I break it I’m not too upset. That said, a watch for £3-£5 is usually in need of plenty of talc and so it pushes me to learn more

Stay safe and thanks for suggesting the movement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wonder if 9415 is based on a base oil of 941? it's interesting what questions bring and the tech sheet answers it's the viscosity of the base oil. Then the impact? There is something we're missing here for that which would have a big influence on all of the house image above is 9514 image below is 941.then always interesting when specifications do not exactly agree? They ledge above for 941 indicates 110 viscosity but the image off the spec sheet is slightly less but I guess close enough   my understanding of the concern of too much 9415 is as we know the loss of amplitude. But why do we have a loss of amplitude? So impact it's basically oil should be very slippery. But what about non-impact? Like the edges of the escape wheel? Another thing that comes to play here is the shape of the escape wheel itself. Notice on the last a more vintage escape wheel with just a flat surface whereas the modern escape wheels usually made out of steel versus grass much much thinner their contact areas greatly been reduced and sometimes I think there even slightly curved. So is it conceivable at everything that isn't a flat surface on impact is going to be sticky? So this is where the shape of the escape wheel will have a big impact literally on how slippery things are. Oh and for all of you obsessed with worrying about too much 9415 I never worry about it because typically I'm doing pocket watches and it doesn't seem to be an issue at all. on the other hand I'm much more concerned about a watch that keeps time for 24 hours as opposed to the concern of the group of keeping amplitude for 24 hours. Then yes some pocket watches have steel escape wheels and do look like the escape wheel on the right.   
    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
    • Yep i can see where you're going with that one Rich.  Sooo now that I've frightened the OP into submission 😁. Chief i do apologise for some reason unbeknown to myself I'm in a happy silly mood. So seriously to identify the movement lets have a look at the dial side, learning this part is straightforward, just need a little logic and something called the # BESTFIT BOOKS # . Or the other non American equivalents. 
    • I can definitely see elephant and aardvark and possibly some sort of bird with a large beak 🤣 anyway I'll have a go of getting it flipped over tonight and send some pics
    • A Schild movements often have left handed crown screws. A pic of the keyless works would help identify it, and the size of the movement. Looks like someone has had a, not very subtle, attempt to decrease play in the centre wheel. And the hairspring looks like it needs some work. From the scratches on the bridges, it looks like it was last serviced by a drunken baboon, but it's a good movement to practice on. Good luck 
×
×
  • Create New...