Jump to content

Help identifying movement


Nikia

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone! Nicola’s here. Today I’m working on a pocket watch that my grandpa gave me, he said the watch doesn’t wind up. As soon as I opened it, I noticed the click spring on the ratchet wheel stop was missing. I still have to dismantle the movement and check out where the little guy went, however the movement wasn’t running so fingers crossed it hasn’t caused any damage.

 

I just ordered a mega assortment of click springs, hope I can adapt one of those.

 

Can anybody chime in and help me identify this movement? It doesn’t seem to have any markings on the mainplate.

It’s from a “index” pocket watch.

Here to the pic:

 

6e102e6cb52773c050bf78d990d6f913.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uggghh i feel your pain, these swiss pocket watches can be difficult to identify. I know index was a micro brand from the West End SA watch company in switzerland, (which introduced the first incabloc in 1934) not to be confused with the West End watch CO. from Pennsylvania USA. Depending on dating this could be an FHF movement since thats what they were known to use up until the 60s when ETA became a big player. It is an incabloc so we can note its no older than 1934 and no newer than 1960. So safe to say this an FHF most likely from the 50s based on its design.

https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/fontainemelon.php

here is some info on fontainmelon (FHF). Did you look on the dial side to see if you can see the logo, that is normally where you would find them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FHF did make movements with some pretty angular bridges and that's some great info from @saswatch88 on Index but we might have a non-Swiss company using the same brand name here as I'd agree with @rogart63 on the Chinese origin. Here's such a Shanghai movement that looks similar: https://17jewels.info/movements/s/shanghai/shanghai-zse/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

FHF did make movements with some pretty angular bridges and that's some great info from @saswatch88 on Index but we might have a non-Swiss company using the same brand name here as I'd agree with @rogart63 on the Chinese origin. Here's such a Shanghai movement that looks similar: https://17jewels.info/movements/s/shanghai/shanghai-zse/

I was initially going to say it could be chinese. And i would agree that would be the case if you cant find any FHF markings anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Nikia said:

 

Hi everyone! Nicola’s here. Today I’m working on a pocket watch that my grandpa gave me, he said the watch doesn’t wind up. As soon as I opened it, I noticed the click spring on the ratchet wheel stop was missing. I still have to dismantle the movement and check out where the little guy went, however the movement wasn’t running so fingers crossed it hasn’t caused any damage.

 

I just ordered a mega assortment of click springs, hope I can adapt one of those.

 

Can anybody chime in and help me identify this movement? It doesn’t seem to have any markings on the mainplate.

It’s from a “index” pocket watch.

Here to the pic:

 

6e102e6cb52773c050bf78d990d6f913.jpg

 

To assist with a search the size in Ligne and a pic of the keyless side really helps to narrow down the hunt. Also be aware there were a lot of pocket watch manufactures that made pocket watches just to be sold on as un-branded so finding the calibre is really difficult. Ie I recently repaired an un-branded Pocket watch that needed a new balance staff and just by luck I found the watch on the net but it was made by Omega. I purchased the Omega balance and it fitted perfectly so job done. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the part . Found an old Breitling fake watch. The setting lever looks the same and so does the balance bridge. It's an automatic movement . But it has the click and click spring intact. If you want it send me a PM 

DSC09859.JPG

DSC09858.JPG

DSC09857.JPG

Edited by rogart63
pictures
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you sir! This forum really is a resource :)
I managed to adapt a spring I found in another movement I had for spares, stripped the movement, cleaned and oiled. Seems it works nicely now, however looks like I’m unable to adjust the beat error lower than this.
I guess I can live with that, as the movement is a cheap chinese 17 jewels!
6d78c7e3e7d5aebc0df483e9e263d178.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read that same article last night  H.  I think epilame is too much headache for me, sources aren't always accurate, some conflicting. Such is the GRAVITY of this situation, Is it ok if i just STICK  to a thixotropic oil 🤣
    • Not sure I follow along. As I stated in one of my previous posts, the epilame will remain intact between rubbing parts as long as the surface is lubricated by oil or grease. Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
×
×
  • Create New...