Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just wonderd what your views were on this?

 

For anyone not knowing, ETA announced a while back they are stopping the sale of all spare parts on December 31st 2015. After this date only Authorised service centres will b able to get them, so once cousins, boley etc supplies have been exhausted we will no longer be able to get them, meaning the customer has to pay extortiate prices.

 

What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suppliers have been told they are not allowed to change ordering patterns, well at least that's what the letter from ETA to cousins said. It said they must continue to order supplies as normal, any abnormalities with quantities will not be fulfilled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a piece of $h!t, the price of second hand movement will also take a hike in price. As Lawson posted earlier, the Japanese manufactures should benefit from it.

 

I only really restore vintage so always had this problem, everyone in this field is going to feel it :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....and that's why I tend to stick to old Seiko's but then again I only do this for the fun? of it. The really sad part of it is there are some really good pro's out there who are going to get truly shafted but this outrageous behaviour.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

....and that's why I tend to stick to old Seiko's but then again I only do this for the fun? of it. The really sad part of it is there are some really good pro's out there who are going to get truly shafted but this outrageous behaviour.

Time.to.speed up 3d printing tech!/

I'm sure generic parts will be available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only glimmer of hope is the BHI are in talks with the swiss guys. Therefore a slim chance of a change of policy by Swatch but in my opinion very slim.

The biggest worry for us guys is Swatch also own the companies that make jewels, springs, batteries & lots more.  :thumbsd:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the fight is still on for what it's worth. I would encourage all board members to contact their local elected leaders about this.

 

I know it is now on my priority list to write to John Hayes (my MP), he was very happy when I fixed up his Omega for him a few years ago so I am sure he will be interested to know that in the future he may be forced to send it to Omega and pay upwards of £600 for servicing. 

 

It's simple - take away consumer choice = corporate monopoly = illegal

 

The car industry tried it and failed, why should the watch industry get away with it!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will in time write to Vince Cable (trade & Industry sec) but I suspect there is little he can do. 

In my opinion the only way to progress forward & I have written this before in the BHI journal, the achilles heel of the multi national organisations is bad publicity. I have not written any letters yet in case it scuppers the present talks between BHI & the Swiss. I suspect if anything does come out of the talks it will be in future you will need accreditations of some sort to purchase, either a certain criteria of equipment or exam pass.

 

If nothing positive comes out of the talks then everyone needs to email too.....

[email protected]

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If attempts to swerve Swatch off course fail, then the people who will fill the gap are:

 

  • s/h movement sellers on eBay
  • the Japanese watch industry
  • the Chinese watch industry
  • other manufacturers who develop their own movements independently of Swatch, such as Christopher Ward
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul78, on 09 Jan 2015 - 04:23 AM, said:

Suppliers have been told they are not allowed to change ordering patterns, well at least that's what the letter from ETA to cousins said. It said they must continue to order supplies as normal, any abnormalities with quantities will not be fulfilled.

 

Hi Paul,

 

Hording parts is not the answer.  Swatch simply have to made a VERY minor design change, and the parts, for say, an 2824 will not fit the new 2824-xx.  And with CNC technology these days they can do that type of re-design quickly.

 

The answer is inform and educate your friends and clients that Swiss based movements will be money pits to service in the future.  Explain the quality and advantages of buying a high-end Japanese movement: like a Grand Seiko.  And I truly hope the Japs take full advantage of this and start a huge marketing campaign, train independents on their movements, and make spare parts easy and affordable to obtain.  Can you imagine what would happen to Swatch if they did that? :huh:

 

Like I said in a previous post: "For the Swiss Houses to say that only their watchmakers are qualified and skilled enough to repair and service their movement is complete affectation."  Swatch are doing this out of greed, pure and simple, so the only way to punish those who lust for money is to remove it from them.  And keep it removed until the Swatch Group dies, and the Swiss re-learn an old lesson they seem to have forgotten, and we don't have one corporation controlling the entire future of watchmaking.

 

Lawson hops down from his soapbox :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree and have said it before, lets hope this is the kickstart the industry needs in the Uk for the future.......with the advancement of CNC machine tools and design, bar the springs and jewels one machinetool is capable of machining all the parts required to produce a watch. A have look at Citizenmachinery.co.uk. £100k and a decent apprentice trained programmer will get anyone started!!..

Edited by ash145
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

Hording parts is not the answer. Swatch simply have to made a VERY minor design change, and the parts, for say, an 2824 will not fit the new 2824-xx. And with CNC technology these days they can do that type of re-design quickly.

The answer is inform and educate your friends and clients that Swiss based movements will be money pits to service in the future. Explain the quality and advantages of buying a high-end Japanese movement: like a Grand Seiko. And I truly hope the Japs take full advantage of this and start a huge marketing campaign, train independents on their movements, and make spare parts easy and affordable to obtain. Can you imagine what would happen to Swatch if they did that? :huh:

Like I said in a previous post: "For the Swiss Houses to say that only their watchmakers are qualified and skilled enough to repair and service their movement is complete affectation." Swatch are doing this out of greed, pure and simple, so the only way to punish those who lust for money is to remove it from them. And keep it removed until the Swatch Group dies, and the Swiss re-learn an old lesson they seem to have forgotten, and we don't have one corporation controlling the entire future of watchmaking.

Lawson hops down from his soapbox :)

Hi Lawson, very well said!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you got the pallet fork installed in the movement when you see the train move when using the setting works? As nevenbekriev said, without the pallet fork to lock the train, the behaviour you are describing is normal. If this is happening with the pallet fork installed, you have a problem in the gear train, it should be immobile when the pallet fork is locking the escape wheel.  The fit of the circlip above the pinions on that wheel is crooked in your pictures, it should sit flat up against the upper pinion as in Marc’s picture.  Hope that helps, Mark
    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
×
×
  • Create New...