Jump to content

Erratic behaviour crown down


aac58

Recommended Posts

Hi again!

I'm working on a Seiko 7005-7012 that I bought non-running. On disassembling I inmediatly discovered that the bottom escape wheel pivot was broken, so I replaced it. Then when testing the motion side on the timegrapher the machine could not read anything clear, it was all a nightmare of dots on the screen.

As the escape wheel was faulty, I suspected of the pallet fork, so I also change that, and yes, now everithing is ok on the timegrapher. Everything except...

This is what I have:

Untitled-1.jpg

So I'm very happy in most positions, but the data in position crown down/9 up is awful! And the lines are not as clean. I have the watch on the timegrapher while I'm writing this and now it says the amplitude is 145 and the beat error is changing, sometimes 4.4, or 2.7, or ...

Any clue about what can be the most probable cause? Maybe I'll try another balance? I thinh everything is really clean, except maybe the pallet fork, as I took a spare whitout cleaning it and I do not know it it was cleaned by me before.

As always, thank you for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your answers.

As my skills are so limited I cannot reshellac an impulse jewel. I have now another balance on the ultrasonic right now with its incabloc disassembled too, so I will try this one. Anyway, I've tested this new balance on a 7009 I have for tests and this one also have some problems in some positions, we'll see how it behaves after the clean and oiling of the cap jewel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your answers.
As my skills are so limited I cannot reshellac an impulse jewel. I have now another balance on the ultrasonic right now with its incabloc disassembled too, so I will try this one. Anyway, I've tested this new balance on a 7009 I have for tests and this one also have some problems in some positions, we'll see how it behaves after the clean and oiling of the cap jewel.

Just grab the impulse jewel carefully with tweezers and see if it moves at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does your timing machine show a graphical display you can show us?

Besides swapping escapement components what other servicing have you done to this watch? Plus what sort of lubrication are you using especially on the escapement components.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cleaned the hole thing, and oiled it using 9010 and hp1300. On the exit stone of the first pallet I put a drop of 9010, I've seen others using it although I now it's not the best there. I didn't oiled the second pallet.

I have no photos of the timegrapher screen, and as I do not have a permanent desk I have uninstaled it. I'll take some photos next time I check the watch. But the data I gave is about what you can see there, the lines are very clean and nice in all positions except crown down, where they are quite messy. Lift angle was established at 53.0. I do not think there is any other relevant information you can see on the screen, is there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly *something*, most likely a jewel,  is worn ovoid (egg shaped), or partially gummed up,  so things are fine until a pivot drops in to the worn part of the ovoid hole, or sticks on the gunk,  whereupon the relative geometry of the gears change, as pivot ends are no longer parallel, or running true and free.

Clean and check the balance jewels, the fork jewels and the escape wheel jewels, under high magnification, also check the end shake of these components. Clean and re-check their pivots too. 

Also check the hairspring is completely flat, as if not, it may be able to foul on something, but only in certain positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, aac58 said:

I cleaned the hole thing, and oiled it using 9010 and hp1300. On the exit stone of the first pallet I put a drop of 9010, I've seen others using it although I now it's not the best there. I didn't oiled the second pallet.

I have no photos of the timegrapher screen, and as I do not have a permanent desk I have uninstaled it. I'll take some photos next time I check the watch. But the data I gave is about what you can see there, the lines are very clean and nice in all positions except crown down, where they are quite messy. Lift angle was established at 53.0. I do not think there is any other relevant information you can see on the screen, is there?

Using 9010 on the escapement is fine it's what they used to use.  Did you put one drop on the exit stone only? 

The numbers up above in a spreadsheet did they come from a timing app or a timing machine?

The only reason I want a photograph of the timing machine is sometimes perfect lines to one person may not be perfect to someone else.

Your amplitudes appear to be low even for Seiko especially if the watch has been fully wound up?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I let it stop from fully wind to fully unwind, mostly 9 up, and now I've wound it fully and have it on the TG. Here is what I'm seeing:

Info-7005.jpg

It is near what I had previously. Once thing to mention is that it takes quite some time to stabilize after moving from one position to another, maybe too much.

I agree that the amplitude could be better, but honestly this is about the best result I've got so far. Sometimes I see up to 225º but for short periods of time. Figures change on screen more than I'd like.

I could start testing things like changing the balance, but I'd love to have a reason before I do it. For example, if I suspect the hair spring can be touching something only in that position, that would be a good reason to check another balance.

What do you guys think is the best rasonable way to proceed?

EDIT: BTW I don't beleive in miracles, but after a few minutes on the TG 6 UP lines are getting cleaner (and amplitude lower) Not sure if it is reliable.

EDIT AGAIN: No it's not a miracle, it was clean only for a few minutes.

IMG-20191019-190119.jpg

Edited by aac58
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of simple tests:

can you grab the balance rim and lift and drop the wheel to see if the end shake appears excessive? Even if you don’t know what this should look like, start doing it now as it’s a common, trivial examination. Be careful when doing this with non-antishock balance jewel settings. 

Secondly, hold the watch in the questionable position, and under lots of light and magnification, observe the balance wheel and hairspring: does it rub anywhere?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was looking the balance under the USB scope I noticed that the balance was swinging a bit, not as much as in the 6119 I previously posted, but it wasn't moving as it should. I think I have lots of 700x balances in poor conditions!

As I said before, I was cleaning and oiling another balance for this movement. It has given me some problems to clean and oil properly, but finally I've instaled it in this movement, and the results are much better so far. I'll let it run out of the case for a while before installing the calendar works, dial and hands and put it into its case.

B-Info-7005.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
×
×
  • Create New...