Jump to content

Pocket watch barrel bridge and barrel disassembly


Recommended Posts

I am trying to get an old pocket watch running for a neighbour of mine. It has Louis Eschholz Gotha inscribed in the case, which would make it easily 100 years old. As you can see, there is a key for winding and setting. Here's the partially disassembled movement, still in the case until I worked out how to remove it. It's got a cylinder escapement, so there was an exciting moment when I removed the balance.

DSC01704.thumb.JPG.4cc9d8ccacd1ffbb5286fba29781e265.JPG

What would have been the correct let the mainspring down?

Luckily no damage was done, so I got everything stripped down completely except for the barrel and bridge assembly. Any suggestions how I should proceed? Unfortunately the stop work is incomplete.

DSC01719.thumb.JPG.24ce12d930719e58112fc30d0d8cc50a.JPG

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may have a two-piece barrel-arbor. That means that in order to remove it from the bridge, you must unscrew the sides of the arbor. That's what I had to do do on a Vacheron that I worked on recently.

When oldhippy wakes up, he may tell you that the arbor has left-handed threads, so be careful, and don't proceed until you know. You can snap the square off the arbor. Sorry to say, but I have done it.

If you indeed got as lucky as you think you did when you pulled the balance, it was probably because there was very little power left in the mainspring. All's well if it ends well. Good luck with the watch.

Edited by MrRoundel
Typo correction
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I was an early bird and took some minutes to disassemble a bridge like yours.
I let the pictures speak for them self since there is not that much to comment.
One can like me be lazy and use a wrench as an vice, I also uce a circle to unscrew the nut part of the barrel arbour.
Hope this helps you...
 

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The correct way would be to let the power down with the correct size watch key, by moving the click away from the ratchet, that is located under the little plate, held by the tiny screws. Always remember with a cylinder escapement there are no pallets, so power must be released first before any attempt is made removing the balance.

So you have the barrel and the bridge all together. Remove the barrel cape and remove the spring. The barrel arbor should unscrew and become two pieces, and then it will come away from the bridge. Many are not easy to take completely apart, if you find this my advice would be to clean it as it is, you do not want to damage the arbor. You have the thin plate off which exposes the ratchet, that is the part that is going to be the most dirty part and underneath.

I cannot remember which way the arbor unscrews. Its over 25 years ago for me. Not all arbors have the two holes as in the diagram above. so be careful. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got to think about it when I read the part of letting  the power down, these movements have a stop function in the winding.
If you just let the barrel go in an uncontrolled way you might break the stop finger. I often find these ratteling in the watches from now and then, and I can't see it in your picture of the barrel bridge either.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good show,  you did good by not removing the balance till the main spring was let down.  "no pallets in this design!"   a watch "with pallets"  it is proper to remove the ballance before spring let down.   keep up the good work.   vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, vinn3 said:

good show,  you did good by not removing the balance till the main spring was let down

No, I did not do good! I did very bad, but got away with it thankfully, as it's not my watch. Lesson learned. Look before you leap and all that. Thanks for the encouragement!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote
12 hours ago, HSL said:

Today I was an early bird and took some minutes to disassemble a bridge like yours.
I let the pictures speak for them self since there is not that much to comment.
One can like me be lazy and use a wrench as an vice, I also uce a circle to unscrew the nut part of the barrel arbour.
Hope this helps you...
 

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg

 

That is (almost) identical to the part I have. Could not have wished for better support, thank you! I do not have the two holes in the barrel arbour, so I can't use a compass or similar to unscrew it. I will try gripping the circumference with something. The action of the spring suggests it is a conventional right-hand thread, correct?

11 hours ago, HSL said:

Just got to think about it when I read the part of letting  the power down, these movements have a stop function in the winding.
If you just let the barrel go in an uncontrolled way you might break the stop finger. I often find these ratteling in the watches from now and then, and I can't see it in your picture of the barrel bridge either.
 

Part of the stop-function (the disc with the finger on it) was missing when I opened the case, so it may well have been broken by another bodger who got there before me. I have the Maltese cross part. I may have a go at making a replacement if it's not too difficult. Would you have a picture of the part I need? How is it held in place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, MrRoundel said:

It may have a two-piece barrel-arbor. That means that in order to remove it from the bridge, you must unscrew the sides of the arbor. That's what I had to do do on a Vacheron that I worked on recently.

When oldhippy wakes up, he may tell you that the arbor has left-handed threads, so be careful, and don't proceed until you know. You can snap the square off the arbor. Sorry to say, but I have done it.

If you indeed got as lucky as you think you did when you pulled the balance, it was probably because there was very little power left in the mainspring. All's well if it ends well. Good luck with the watch.

Thanks for the encouragement. I think it has to be a right-hand thread on the arbor, due to the direction the spring is acting. The mainspring did indeed have quite a bit of power left in it. There was a buzzing and a whirring for quite a while after I pulled out the balance, so it seems I have been very lucky indeed! I will check everything carefully again for damage. I have already found one cracked jewel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job. That was smart using that compass(?) for a "special wrench". I can't remember what I used. It might have been a junky set of tweezers. I'll remember the compass-tool.

Bob Tascione has a nice animation of the workings of the stopworks. In it, you should be able to see the shape of the part you need. It's on youtube. Search his name and you'll find it. Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad I could help a little bit and Yes it's is a ordinary right hand thread on them.
It's quite common those are missing, as a fact I looked for one for a IWC 66 a while but ended up making one.

If you look a the sqare stem you will find a small hole in it, it's where you put a thin pin in to lock the finger piece into place.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, vinn3 said:

good show,  you did good by not removing the balance till the main spring was let down.  "no pallets in this design!"   a watch "with pallets"  it is proper to remove the ballance before spring let down.   keep up the good work.   vin

     no problem; keep going, you are learning to hate that type of escapment.  vin

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, HSL said:

Glad I could help a little bit and Yes it's is a ordinary right hand thread on them.
It's quite common those are missing, as a fact I looked for one for a IWC 66 a while but ended up making one.

If you look a the sqare stem you will find a small hole in it, it's where you put a thin pin in to lock the finger piece into place.

Many thanks once again HSL! It looks like making one may be beyond me, but I will have a go and report back. The square stem does indeed have a hole for a pin. Some of the pin is still in there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 7/16/2019 at 2:47 AM, HSL said:

Today I was an early bird and took some minutes to disassemble a bridge like yours.
I let the pictures speak for them self since there is not that much to comment.
One can like me be lazy and use a wrench as an vice, I also uce a circle to unscrew the nut part of the barrel arbour.
Hope this helps you...

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg

I am not here to judge your tools selection as I used the same "professional set" ?

However, I believe your comments above "split the barrel arbour" and "the gear is friction fitted and can be pressed out" maybe misleading. At least in my case, it was a screw-in two part arbour, not press fitted. And there was no way I could split the arbour as those two holes are ... just two holes...

IMG_2582 - Copy.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you got the pallet fork installed in the movement when you see the train move when using the setting works? As nevenbekriev said, without the pallet fork to lock the train, the behaviour you are describing is normal. If this is happening with the pallet fork installed, you have a problem in the gear train, it should be immobile when the pallet fork is locking the escape wheel.  The fit of the circlip above the pinions on that wheel is crooked in your pictures, it should sit flat up against the upper pinion as in Marc’s picture.  Hope that helps, Mark
    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
×
×
  • Create New...