Jump to content

Chromium plated or s/s ?


Johnnie

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have been looking at Bergeon screwdriver sets and have noticed that they are Chromium plated or stainless steel and are priced differently. Is one better than the other? Is there a reason ? Sorry if this is a dumb question but I feel the need to know the answer !  Many thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's just like watches and car parts were classified once upon a time, and I'm surprised that Bergen still plays this game.
Chrome plating is applied on a cheaper metal to  prevent oxidation and make it look good.
Stainless Steel is tough and looks good by itself.
Eventually the industry advanced so much that SS become preponderant for most uses.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jdm said:

Well it's just like watches and car parts were classified once upon a time, and I'm surprised that Bergen still plays this game.
Chrome plating is applied on a cheaper metal to  prevent oxidation and make it look good.
Stainless Steel is tough and looks good by itself.
Eventually the industry advanced so much that SS become preponderant for most uses.

Thank you Jdm, question answered, stainless steel it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Johnnie said:

I believe the body, Measuretwice ! All I really wish to do is buy a good quality set of screwdrivers. If anyone can recommend a set I would appreciate it. 

The AF Swiss ones are perfectly good. Far more important is the quality of the tips and keeping them well dressed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

I bought my set back in the 70's Chromium plated and they are still as good as the day I bought them. None of the plate has worn off. So if they are cheaper then s/s you might wan't to save some money.

Hi Oldhippy and thanks for your input. Well if you have used Chromium plated Bergeon since the 70s they must be fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...