Jump to content
  • 0
espenbd

Quartz movement run and stop

Question

Hello, 

Long story short, my father had an old certina quartz watch lying in a drawer that had not worked for many years. The watch is from his father, and i decided to give it a go, to make it run again.

I replaced the battery, but it didn’t work. It looked like the movement was dead, so i began searching for a replacement. After some time i managed to find the same movement, a ESA 947.111

I replaced the original hands and dial on the new movement and replaced the battery with a new one. The watch keeps tikking for a few seconds, but then stops. The issue is not the glass touching the hands, the same problem occurs when the movement is out of the watch case.

Any suggestions? I have never worked with a quartz before, only automatic watches. I really has no idea what to look for. Please see the video:

 

 

Edited by espenbd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I'm not sure about your caliber movement, but many quartz watches are serviceable/cleanable. Of course, some are not. I suspect that yours is just dirty and needs a cleaning and oiling.  In some ways they're easier than mechanical, but in others, like handling the highly magnetic stepping motor, can be a challenge. You will need some brass, or good non-magnetic, tweezers to do so. Good luck.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Sound advice given, If you can lay your hands on a line release tool and give it a short spin and re run the movment , it may just be sticky lubrication not knowing how long it was on the shelf but as mentioned a good clean and lubrication required    all the best

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

The replacement movement was that purchased new from the material house or somewhere else?  Then for the 947 series there appears to be zero technical literature but it looks vaguely similar to the 944 series which came out in 1981. So no matter where you purchase this watch it's going to be need to be serviced. Quartz watches with gears are just like any other mechanical watch at some point in time they need servicing and keep the circuit or the plastic plate out of the cleaning fluid it looks like the watch has a lot of plastic at least for the mainframe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Plastic gives me the creeps.I hate to put a tool to it.you could try flushing the movement out with plastic safe electronic cleaner spray.I have had mixed success doing this...but in my case better success than actually taking ,or more accurately breaking a plastic quartz movement apart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 6/4/2019 at 11:09 AM, JohnR725 said:

The replacement movement was that purchased new from the material house or somewhere else?  Then for the 947 series there appears to be zero technical literature but it looks vaguely similar to the 944 series which came out in 1981. So no matter where you purchase this watch it's going to be need to be serviced. Quartz watches with gears are just like any other mechanical watch at some point in time they need servicing and keep the circuit or the plastic plate out of the cleaning fluid it looks like the watch has a lot of plastic at least for the mainframe.

It was purchased off the bay, so i guess a cleaning and service is needed. Yes, it´s a lot of plastic on the mainframe, but i will try take the movement apart, clean and service it.

Thanks for all the tips everyone! Was hoping it maybe was a quick fix, but i will give it a shot :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 6/4/2019 at 2:09 AM, JohnR725 said:

So no matter where you purchase this watch it's going to be need to be serviced. Quartz watches with gears are just like any other mechanical watch at some point in time they need servicing and keep the circuit or the plastic plate out of the cleaning fluid it looks like the watch has a lot of plastic at least for the mainframe.

I found this out the hard way when I bought an NOS movement for a friend. It wasn't long after changing it out that it started having issues. I suppose it more like a NOOS (New Old Oil Stock).

I have the watch back again, so I'll have to give it a go. Unfortunately, I need new cleaning fluids, as I haven't been happy with the results I'm getting using the mechanical L&R solution in my ultrasonic. Heck, maybe I'll just try the spray contact cleaner on it first. Then I'll use some of that pricey Moebius 9000 quartz oil. Yup, that's what I'll do. Good luck.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 6/5/2019 at 11:27 PM, MrRoundel said:

I found this out the hard way when I bought an NOS movement for a friend. It wasn't long after changing it out that it started having issues. I suppose it more like a NOOS (New Old Oil Stock).

I have the watch back again, so I'll have to give it a go. Unfortunately, I need new cleaning fluids, as I haven't been happy with the results I'm getting using the mechanical L&R solution in my ultrasonic. Heck, maybe I'll just try the spray contact cleaner on it first. Then I'll use some of that pricey Moebius 9000 quartz oil. Yup, that's what I'll do. Good luck.

 

 

Thanks, good luck to you too! Have you tried the contact cleaner yet?

Stripped down the movement today, it’s a lot of plastic. The circut board looks to be inside the main plate, so i can’t run it in the cleaner. Anyway, i have pegged the jevel holes with pegwood and had a clean up with rodico. The other parts will go in the cleaner, except the steppingmotor.

F144DE3C-476F-4FDF-B2DB-2DDD338F7EA6.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

No, I haven't gotten into it yet. I'm investigating a few spray cleaners available for quartz watches, as well as trying to figure out if the product DeOxit will work. It's used to clean electronics like potentiometers on electric guitars and amps, etc. It looks like the active ingredient in some of the quartz cleaning sprays is naptha, which is basically lighter fluid/Coleman white-gas.

You're in there now, so enjoy. It looks like you're being clean enough. One of the problems with my watch might be that my watchmaker's bench isn't as spotless as it may need to be for working on quartz. It doesn't take a lot to stop them. Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Managed to put the movement back together after a lot of struggling with the stepping motor and the bridge. It was a nightmareNow i also understand why some of you can’t stand to work with plastic.. i broke a plastic pivot. Luckily for me, i managed to repair it.

The watch is finally running again! Can’t believe it, my father is going to be so happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Next up is the motor speed control. I did think long and hard about my original aim of maintaining as much originality as possible. And, there is no doubt that the original speed control rheostat was a) original and b) functional. But - as I was an electronics technician in an earlier life, and also health and safety professional in a more recent life, the safety aspects weighed heavily upon my concience. Logic played it's part as well - with the original rheostat put back into service, albeit with some hand-made guarding to keep put the fingers of the unwary, it would be safe-is, for me to use. BUT NOT FOR ANYONE ELSE. Only the knowledge of what lurked underneath would be keeping me safe, but anyone else might not have a chance. As can be seen from the first photo below, all of the wire on the resistors is not only unguarded, but within millimetres of the level of the base. Also, the incoming mains terminals to the rheostat are also dangerously unguarded.  
    • Back to the job in hand. I managed to find the cork I thought I may have had, lurking in a box under the stairs. It was the most part of an A4 sized sheet, so more than enough for my purposes - to sit the jars on whilst they are in the machine. Looking at the metal bases, I really can't be convinced if there ever was any cork or any other material for that matter there. But for me anyway, the idea of the glass jars sitting directly on the metal base just seems wrong and I would prefer some cork there as a cushion. It's about as tidy as it needs to be, given the shape of the metal webbing. I suppose I could have cut-out squares of cork, but then it would leave potential weak, unsupported areas of cork, which would likely need some form of strengthening. Anyway - this application suits me and helps the jars sit a bit more stable in their locations. Whilst I am in the vicinity, so to speak, I have also added an earth lead which will bond the chassis to the incoming mains lead, once fitted. This is visible in these photos.  
    • A little further research and then on with the show... A quick browse through patent databases, shows that one Saul Lanzetter applied for and was awarded a patent for this design of watch cleaning machine in October 1937. A brief narrative is reproduced here: Interestingly, the patent application is entitled "Improvements in apparatus for cleaning watch parts and other small parts of machinery." It may be reading too much onto this title to assume that there may have been a previous patent, pre-dating this one, as this one refers to "improvements". Also of interest, there were 2 patent applications from US companies in 1944 and 1945 which cite the Lanzetter patent, and three from Germany in 1956, 1960 and 1961 (only one of which was actually published), which also cite the Lanzetter patent as a reference. Incidentally - the two US patents refer to machines which look strikingly similar to the National Model VI-C above, and the National No 4. machine in the earlier advert, showing the four jars side by side ( this seems to be referred to as a lab machine, rather than a repair shop machine). Naturally, all patents or applications referred to above are now expired. For me anyway, I think this may clear up which watch cleaning machine may have come first (at least in this machine format anyway): The S. Lanzetter National Electric Watch Cleaning Machine, circa 1937.  
    • Impressive work. The barrel and mainspring look almost new, and the remaining pitting is no worse than some lesser movements left the factory with. I'm looking forward to the next installment.
    • Has anyone ever used Longines free service to get an extract from their archives on their watch? https://www.longines.com/certificate-of-authenticity See the above link, if you just want the extract they will post it to you for free, obviously if you want a certificate of Authenticity you need to send them your watch and pay for that, but the extract is free.   I'm going to ask for the extract on my 30LS Longines.
×
×
  • Create New...