Jump to content

Breitling chronometre running backwards


Recommended Posts

Check the stator, if it has been slightly deformed it can make the watch run backwards.

A heavy bang or drop can be enough to bend it and cause it to run backwards

Edited by Tmuir
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi    Thats the stator assembly It looks ok , Is the rotor ok pivots not bent etc, there is always the possibility of the circuit assy being faulty.

Hi, yes I checked the stator on an engineering plate and it seemed straight and true, the rotor pivots all looked good so put it back together and it is still running backwards, unless someone can tell me differently I have come to the same conclusion that it must be the circuit. Have no idea where I will get a circuit from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Q  Did I read the numbers right  eta 35-4874 for the calibre, had look on the eta lists its not on how old is the watch, they now use normaline ,flatline  etc as definitions of the class of quartz watches. 

Took a look at an slightly older one it had a ETA 988.332 this movement is an ETA 988.333

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so i have tested the coils and my tester says they are ok but the fault is the ic according to my tester which i assume means intergrated circuit, trouble is im not an electrician, anybody know where i can get a circuit board from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
×
×
  • Create New...