Jump to content

Tension v non tension crystals

Lc130

By Lc130
in Watch Repairs Help & Advice

 Share

Recommended Posts

Lc130 WRT Addict

Lc130

Posted
Posted

HI All

I'm having trouble finding any type of basic guide to crystals.  Some old scratched ones that I remove have a metal insert and I believe that these are called tension rings.  Is that correct?  Are they also referred to as "armored"?  Some old crystals have no ring.  Question:  if I had just a case without the old crystal how would I know if I needed a replacement with or without the tension ring?  Are they interchangeable? Can I use the crystal claw for either or is a press needed?

Thank you

Charlie

 

nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted

Tension ring (armored) crystals are straight sided, and need to be pressed in. The non-tension ring, or wedge-ledge or whatever the given manufacturer calls them, need to be compressed to snap in. Either the claw tool or a crystal press with a cupped die and pusher for the center of the (interior) of the crystal will work. They aren't interchangeable- though that hasn't stopped people from trying!

  • Like 1
Lc130 WRT Addict

Lc130

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thank you.  Would a GS crystal "ET EVR-TITE"  described as "waterproof with white or yellow rings" be a tension ring.  This is for a late 60's early 70's Seiko 5 with a 6119A movement.  Ordering parts appears to be a hi-level skill in itself!

qhartman Watch Enthusiast

qhartman

Posted
Posted

Just a note on the claw. If you don't have one already, I'd put off ordering them. They only work with crystals with very vertical, tall sides. In every case I've tried to use one, it's failed, and I've ended up using my press instead. I'm sure there's some situation where they are the better tool, but I haven't found it yet.

jguitron WRT Addict

jguitron

Posted
Posted
Just a note on the claw. If you don't have one already, I'd put off ordering them. They only work with crystals with very vertical, tall sides. In every case I've tried to use one, it's failed, and I've ended up using my press instead. I'm sure there's some situation where they are the better tool, but I haven't found it yet.




I agree. The claw is ideal for non-waterproof crystals that have a a nice tall side wall for the claw to have a good purchase. Those crystals are thinner and easier to compress, mostly I. Dress watches of chronos. I can’t see how the claw could compress a thick water-proof crystal enough to fit in the case. The press is definitely the way to go.

Now there are presses and there are presses! The cheaper you go, the less they pushers align and the higher the risk of cracking crystals.

Cheers!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lc130 WRT Addict

Lc130

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I did buy a Bergeon claw.  As mentioned, it sometimes has a trouble grasping.  I concentrate on wrist watches from the 60s and 70s.  Not sure what qualifies as vintage.

Edited by Lc130
yankeedog Distinguished Member

yankeedog

Posted
Posted

I use a "claw" for compressible crystals. it is in my opinion an excellent tool. I don't have a crystal press, I use my drill press. With the socket from my tool chest that most closely matches the crystal diameter. A plastic bag prevents scratches... All the leverage you could ever need.

manodeoro WRT Addict

manodeoro

Posted
Posted

I have both :

- crystal press (since a few months)

- crystal claw (since this morning)

 

I use crystal press to fit all plexis that come "over a rehaut" (vintage Rolex & Tudor style), fixed bezel, retaining rings and crystals fitted with a gasket.

Until today I managed to remove other plexis with a press and to put them back using the hot/cold method (watch case in a cool oven and plexi in the freezer) ... but I cracked some plexi and I even had problem with armored crystals.

 

So I ordered a crystal claw, received it today and tried it on a vintage diver with an armoured plexi.

It worked perfectly (the crack you can see on the plexi was already there when I got the watch) so I'm really happy with that new tool.

 

tqtvf.jpg

 

tq4qX.jpg

 

tqrep.jpg

  • Like 1
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • HectorLooi
      DIY Bronze tweezers

      By HectorLooi · Posted

      I love my brass tweezers and use them for 90% of my work. I like that brass is soft and does not scratch parts and it seems to grip parts better than stainless steel. And brass is also non-magnetic, which really helps when working on quartz movements. However, brass is a little too weak for jobs like pulling back yoke springs. So I thought of upgrading to bronze. But I can't seem to find curved bronze tweezers. And Cousins price for a pair of Bergeon straight bronze tweezers is around £45. A couple of months back I had the idea of swapping out the carbon fibre tips of my tweezers and putting in bronze tips. And that is what I did. I got a piece of 2.0mm bronze sheet from AliExpress and cut out 2 curved tips and replaced the carbon fibre tips. I'll probably thin down the tip further gradually to a point where it still has strength to draw back thick yoke springs. 
    • JohnL
      Reusing mainsprings in an automatic and slipping

      By JohnL · Posted

      Ah, well that's a relief, though the parts document does list a 1520 which is a coupling clutch. This threw me for a while (it's a quiet day in the office) until I realised I couldn't see a listing for the reverser wheels. So, we're back to the mainspring should slip in the barrel. It can really only be one of three things (that I'm aware of) mainspring 'coned' and pressing slightly on the lid the kink, close to the  end of the spring, which puts a sort of a self lock grip on the spring and may not allow the spring to release enough there to allow slipping quantity of lubrication, either not enough, or too little Two of those require new mainsprings, which aren't readily available, though I may post a query about alternative mainspring sizes. The third, will more grease or less be required? The word breaking in breaking grease suggests more means more breaking?
    • AndyGSi
      Reusing mainsprings in an automatic and slipping

      By AndyGSi · Posted

      The idler gear I'm referring too is the one between the 2 barrel wheels. These movements just rely on the spring slipping to prevent over winding.
    • EtherJunky
      Tip and tricks here.

      By EtherJunky · Posted

      Not sure how useful this might be, but a while back I bought some bamboo tweezers (multipack with a ridiculous amount of them in) and have been using them in place of pegwood. Seems to be working just fine
    • JohnL
      Reusing mainsprings in an automatic and slipping

      By JohnL · Posted

      Ah, well there is the rub. I ordered a post and oscillating weight, but clicked on the wrong thing when adding the weight to the basket adding an automatic bridge. Ordered a weight, and it's somewhere in the ether after our customs and excise folks rejected it because of the documentation.  Yes, both springs inserted the same. "Is the idler gear ok", and here's why I posted to the newbie area: So, reading between the lines, and again correct me if I'm wrong here, the automatic winding mechanism will have an ideler gear, along with the reverse wheels, that prevents over-winding? There is nothing (that I'm aware of) between the crown pinion, crown wheel, and the ratchet wheels to prevent over-winding other than the mainsprings slipping in the barrels.  This is only the second automatic I've worked on. The other, a Vostok, had a very obvious mechanism.  I shall look at the automatic winding mechanism in a bit more detail when I've a bit more time. At the moment I'm taking a glance here now and then when work is dragging 😉 As ever, thank you for your help. Always appreciated.  
×
×
  • Create New...