Jump to content

Omega 26.5T3 alternative hairsprings ?


mikepilk

Recommended Posts

I had an accident whilst trying to take some 'coning' out of the hairspring on an Omega 26.5T3 - I had it on a balance tack, which I knocked over (it happens :huh:) - completely mangling the spring.

It was so distorted (including the Brequet Overcoil) that I had to straighten the outer coils just to figure out where to start.

I'm starting to get it in to some sort of shape. I'm pretty confident of getting the coils in to a workable state, but I'm not sure I'm up to the overcoil. I've tried before and failed.

My chance of finding a replacement hairspring is virtually nil.

Is there any chance of finding a hairspring from another type of movement which would be close enough to use - or is it not even worth considering ? 

Did Omega manufacture the balance/hairspring themselves, or where they generic parts ?  

I just bought a copy of the BestFIt catalogue and the 'Complete Balance' number (477) is only used on the Omega cal 100, and the 26.5T1/3 which are derivatives of it.

So it looks like I'll have to improve my skill with the tweezers ? :startle: 

I have the 'Chicago School of Watchmaking Lessons' which had detailed instructions on how to make an overcoil, but it does mention using 'overcoil tweezers'.

WIN_20181222_10_50_48_Pro.jpg

WIN_20181021_15_36_41_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very much an optimist but that hairspring is done. An extremely skilled watchmaker might get it "tickable" after some hard hours of work but it will never look right or keep time correctly again.

Almost all companies bought their hairsprings from a few main suppliers. Others bought the escapement and balance complete from a supplier; here the basic escapement parts like wheel, fork and roller table were likely from an established "set" but the pinion, arbor, and balance staff as well as balance were often unique to a caliber or few calibers.

Even two watches of the same caliber made the same day could have utterly non-interchangeable hairsprings. In some cases with careful reduction of screw weight or addition of timing washers a hairspring can be adapted. Sometimes theres a little extra bit of spring that can be slipped out at the stud or a little can be taken in. Generally it's just easier to vibrate a new spring. Which brings up the fact that raw springs are scarce and no new raw springs are available (unless you buy many of the same CGS).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, clockboy said:

The old spring is a goner. Getting a replacement is going to be a long process I have used this company in the past for rare parts; It might be worth contacting them

http://www.urdelar.se/index.php?route=common/home

Thanks for the advice. I tried all the usual sources without success, that's one I haven't found before.

I'll see what I can do with the spring, even if it's only for the practice. I don't want to end up selling the watch for parts, but it might be a long wait until I find a suitable spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

I'm very much an optimist but that hairspring is done. An extremely skilled watchmaker might get it "tickable" after some hard hours of work but it will never look right or keep time correctly again.

Almost all companies bought their hairsprings from a few main suppliers. Others bought the escapement and balance complete from a supplier; here the basic escapement parts like wheel, fork and roller table were likely from an established "set" but the pinion, arbor, and balance staff as well as balance were often unique to a caliber or few calibers.

Even two watches of the same caliber made the same day could have utterly non-interchangeable hairsprings. In some cases with careful reduction of screw weight or addition of timing washers a hairspring can be adapted. Sometimes theres a little extra bit of spring that can be slipped out at the stud or a little can be taken in. Generally it's just easier to vibrate a new spring. Which brings up the fact that raw springs are scarce and no new raw springs are available (unless you buy many of the same CGS).

There is a Renata complete balance replacement - 268. But they seem about as common as the original parts ! 

I''m only vaguely aware of how to vibrate a new spring - but how does it work if you have an overcoil ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I''m only vaguely aware of how to vibrate a new spring - but how does it work if you have an overcoil

Traditionally with watches the hairspring is vibrated to the specific balance wheel. This is why you can't just swap generic hairsprings that visually look the same because they're not going to be the same. Then there is the problem with the overcoil vibrating a hairspring and getting it's characteristics correct then putting the overcoil on and having it exactly where it's supposed to be is extremely challenging. This is why American pocket watch companies didn't do that the hairsprings were made separate from the balance wheels. The only way this works is you have to have timing screws to get the balance wheel to now match the hairspring.

then there used to actually be services that would vibrate hairsprings for balance wheels but they seem to all be disappearing with time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That hairspring is toast. If you can’t find a 26.5 balance then try finding a 30t2 or later equivalent if it fits. The non-inca staff length is the same, but you’d maybe have to change if it’s an inca version. May also require a little work on the overcoil depending on the radius of the indexing pins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, rodabod said:

That hairspring is toast. If you can’t find a 26.5 balance then try finding a 30t2 or later equivalent if it fits. The non-inca staff length is the same, but you’d maybe have to change if it’s an inca version. May also require a little work on the overcoil depending on the radius of the indexing pins. 

Thanks, that's useful info. It is a non-inca balance - I just changed the staff. 

It would be useful if there was a list of the diameter of the balances - then I could look for a similar balance+overcoil hairspring (running at 18000). Maybe, as you say,  have to tweek the overcoil, and even change the staff (if the hole is the same size).

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...