Jump to content

Recommendation For Watchmaker Lathe


bobm12

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  I think its way over the top you are paying for the bergeon name there. I picked one up in the UK for £350 with cross slide,   ,bernard chuck,   drill attachment,   assortmet of collets and cutting tools all mounted with motor etc. Its  an American pattern and quite versatile.

    good score !    but,    some of the new members might not  know how to bid on the net.   I am one.    vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much of an issue do you think this is? Is it a deal breaker? I don’t want to train myself on something that is totally non-standard.  But that set does look great.

 

I would say enough of an issue to avoid it.

 

My recommendation would be a WW pattern lathe, often referred to as American style. Brands to look for are Boley, Boley-Leinen, Lorch, Wolf Jahn from Germany, Levin and Derbyshire from the states.

 

The Brits had a number of excellent makers too, but didn't produce as many as the Germans and Yanks. The Pultra you linked is a great machine, the only drawback is it takes 10mm collets which are harder to find than 8mm. On the other hand it is very complete and the price is fair. It's top quality and plug-and-play... and you always can sell it for the same money.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with nickelsilver... keep away from 10 mm collet lathes. Look for 8 mm collet versions, as you'll find more collets of that size. 6 mm and 10 mm collets are like unicorn poo!

I have a WW type lathe, rather than a 'Geneva' type lathe, because it is versatile and can handle slightly bigger work, especially if I'm using a cross slide, but can cope with small stuff like re pivoting and pivot polishing etc.

The good thing about WW bed lathes is, they have great tail stocks that help with drilling, rather than Geneva type lathes that don't.

WW bed lathes also have a bigger clearance from the lathe bed, which is great especially using a face plate if I need to drill a hole in a watch mainplate to fit a new bush. I find them a lot more versatile, but that's just me.

I know it's a minefield when it comes to buying a lathe. Go with a WW bed like JD Richard owns. So much better in all respects.

If JD can't sort you out, I have one spare...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a set you don't see very often Favorite Lathe

 

Yes, it's expensive, but it's very complete, and these are really good machines. I sold one about 15 years ago that didn't have the milling attachment, wheel chucks, the simple tailstock with pivot drilling discs and with a smaller set of collets for 2500 and that was a friend who bought it. It's pretty much exactly the same as a Schaublin 70, just smaller.

 

If you tried to piece together that set it would take possibly years, and possibly be more expensive.

 

I wouldn't say not to go for that Pultra. It's a really nice setup at a nice price. You've probably already tracked down the page on Tony Griffith's site, but here it is anyway Pultra.

You can see down the page an adapter for going from 10mm to 8mm, which Tony admits may have been shop made. If you got that Pultra, and were smitten with lathe work, it's likely you'd end up getting some other lathe down the line as well; as this is based on the WW pattern, while it's fairly certain tailstocks wouldn't interchange with another maker (the WW or Webster Whitcomb pattern was used more as a guideline than an absolute standard by most maker), the slide certainly will. It can be very handy to have two lathes at times.

 

Tony's site also has a for sale page, often with a number of interesting lathes for watchmaking listed.

 

 

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the UK there are plenty of lathes for sale on a regular basis. There's less WW-pattern ones, but there's nothing wrong with Geneva-pattern lathes. More importantly you want a headstock which turns smoothly with no excessive play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, rodabod said:

In the UK there are plenty of lathes for sale on a regular basis. There's less WW-pattern ones, but there's nothing wrong with Geneva-pattern lathes. More importantly you want a headstock which turns smoothly with no excessive play.

While I'm a fan of the WW pattern, I agree that for most work a Geneva (bar bed) pattern is OK, many many watchmakers and even clockmakers have used them to great success over the last century.

 

Most, like easily 9 out of 10, headstocks one encounters use a hardened steel spindle running in hardened steel plain bearings. Hardened steel on hardened steel is a terrifically durable combination, if there is just a hint of oil there they are practically indestructable. And many lathes saw little actual use, so it's rare for a lathe from a quality maker would have messed up headstock bearings. What would be important to me, after the headstock, would be a tailstock that takes collets, and very importantly, an excellent cross slide with large, readable, settable micrometer thimbles on the cranks. 

 

Many older slides have tiny thimbles, that are not necessarily settable. If looking at Lorch, some of their old stuff not only had tiny thimbles, but had screws with 0.75mm pitch (as opposed to 1mm), and they were backwards in rotation from all other lathes. A fellow I worked for had one, it was his first lathe from when he was young and he loved it. I absolutely could not use it, my muscle memory just wouldn't allow me to turn the cranks correctly. Not to mention keeping track of 0.75mm per rotation! He had numerous other more modern lathes that were "normal", but man he loved that weird little Lorch.

 

All that said Lorch is of the highest quality and their more modern stuff was vastly improved in usability. Their KD 50 model is one of the nicest watchmaker lathes ever built. Steffen Pahlow's superb Youtube channel features many different Lorch machines in his work.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I will also add, is that in the early days, you may not want to use a cross-slide at all. Not that you should avoid a set if it includes one! Most of the work I do is by hand. I don't want to have to set up a cross slide if I can hand grave in a matter of seconds.

Also, in my experience, cross slide work is better on a sturdier bed like a WW or something bigger like a Schaublin. I believe the reason is because you can (perhaps unintentionally) be applying significant pressure when using a cross slide which can cause unwanted movement due to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did you have a look under the ballance? Often the movement maker/number is hidden there.
    • I wonder if 9415 is based on a base oil of 941? it's interesting what questions bring and the tech sheet answers it's the viscosity of the base oil. Then the impact? There is something we're missing here for that which would have a big influence on all of the house image above is 9514 image below is 941.then always interesting when specifications do not exactly agree? They ledge above for 941 indicates 110 viscosity but the image off the spec sheet is slightly less but I guess close enough   my understanding of the concern of too much 9415 is as we know the loss of amplitude. But why do we have a loss of amplitude? So impact it's basically oil should be very slippery. But what about non-impact? Like the edges of the escape wheel? Another thing that comes to play here is the shape of the escape wheel itself. Notice on the last a more vintage escape wheel with just a flat surface whereas the modern escape wheels usually made out of steel versus grass much much thinner their contact areas greatly been reduced and sometimes I think there even slightly curved. So is it conceivable at everything that isn't a flat surface on impact is going to be sticky? So this is where the shape of the escape wheel will have a big impact literally on how slippery things are. Oh and for all of you obsessed with worrying about too much 9415 I never worry about it because typically I'm doing pocket watches and it doesn't seem to be an issue at all. on the other hand I'm much more concerned about a watch that keeps time for 24 hours as opposed to the concern of the group of keeping amplitude for 24 hours. Then yes some pocket watches have steel escape wheels and do look like the escape wheel on the right.   
    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
    • Yep i can see where you're going with that one Rich.  Sooo now that I've frightened the OP into submission 😁. Chief i do apologise for some reason unbeknown to myself I'm in a happy silly mood. So seriously to identify the movement lets have a look at the dial side, learning this part is straightforward, just need a little logic and something called the # BESTFIT BOOKS # . Or the other non American equivalents. 
    • I can definitely see elephant and aardvark and possibly some sort of bird with a large beak 🤣 anyway I'll have a go of getting it flipped over tonight and send some pics
×
×
  • Create New...