Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've got an Omega 26.5 T3 (non-Incabloc) with both pivots broken on the balance staff.

There appears to be several versions available - Incabloc, normal, short, long. 

I've found Ronda 1855, 2796, 3880

Can anyone help as to which I need, or do I have to push out the old one and try to measure it ?

Posted
3 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

According to ballancestaffs it is Ronda 2796.

Regards

They also have it listed as the other numbers too. 

Posted

Are all dimension for the three you listed the same?  

Expectedly different size  rollers and H/S collets .....etc   . 

You will remove the staff anyway, the right choice/ requirments  can then be determined with certainty.

Regards joe

Posted

But with both pivots missing, and two of the staffs only 0.05 mm difference in length !

I might be able to do it on the width at the hairspring collet.

Posted
4 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

But with both pivots missing, and two of the staffs only 0.05 mm difference in length !

I might be able to do it on the width at the hairspring collet.

Right,  reffering to the model clockboy just posted, you also measure G the roller diameter .Though the pivot ligne( diameter) is not available to measure, other sizes are enough for selecting exact correct one.

Posted
1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

But with both pivots missing, and two of the staffs only 0.05 mm difference in length !

I might be able to do it on the width at the hairspring collet.

Measure as best you can. I purchased a balance from Balancestaffs.com and it was the wrong size. Its not their fault though...these older movements are difficult to source parts for. I looked up on J Borel and BestFit MATSYS and they both say 100/594 balance staff, but I can't fine the dimensions. If the Ronda is easier for you to get, then go with the 2796.

1.png.0e46a5b0bd0f1e45b93c616735831ed8.png

1461019129_Screenshot2018-10-20at3_06_47PM.thumb.png.a4409917b0df437ef6fbf7a758f27a92.png

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Assuming the staff in the wheel you got was the correct one, Correct dimemsioms being the main issue,  the difference in pivot diameter 11.75 and 12 are not expected to produce beat error or problems of the sort, or even if we assume all the .05 mm difference in length is in section B, no fault is expected form that either.

I think larger  forced into the wheel would have a roll in the wheel deformation, I am not sure though, perhaps experiences of Clockboy or OH comes to help and answer this. 

Inserting  any linge 12 pivot into the jewels answers some questions, for instance you can see the pivot end coming out of the reverse side of the jewel or not and how far it sticks out.

 All staff sizes are available,  further response coming in will help.

Regards joe

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

2796 is for incabloc is 327 long 

1855 non incabloc is 310 long

But there is also a version for 26.5 that is 1856 that is 332 long 

All in my Ronda book . The 3880 i can't find under Omega. 

Found this and hope it can help out as the dimension on the collet is different. Maybe you can figure out which one you need by measuring . 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-balance-staff-26-5-26-5T1-26-5T2-26-5T3-100-axe-de-balancier-Unruhwelle-/201826585959

Edited by rogart63
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, rogart63 said:

2796 is for incabloc is 327 long 

1855 non incabloc is 310 long

But there is also a version for 26.5 that is 1856 that is 332 long 

All in my Ronda book . The 3880 i can't find under Omega. 

Found this and hope it can help out as the dimension on the collet is different. Maybe you can figure out which one you need by measuring . 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-balance-staff-26-5-26-5T1-26-5T2-26-5T3-100-axe-de-balancier-Unruhwelle-/201826585959

I found that on ebay too - that's why I mentioned the collet size.

Posted

Bestfit online is nice but sometimes the physical books are nicer. So 594 is listed as non-Incabloc. Then the problem with finding the size of the staff is you have to have an idea of how long it is. So I've attached images for the 594 staff size and the equivalent balancestaff.com staff and its size. Then one of the problems with aftermarket replacement staffs even if they're made for a specific watch is they tend to vary a little by size. Usually there physically bigger to allow you to reduce things to fit. It's why the length isn't that important the pivots can be longer and then you can just shorten those. So it's always important with balance staffs to measure what you are taking out and comparing to what you put in to avoid unpleasant surprises.

Then because of the confusion I'm also listing of the Bestfit Incabloc number and its size just so you can compare to whatever. 

OME 26.5T3    100/594    STAFF/OME 26.5    BESTFIT BALANCE STAFF

OME 26.5T3    100/857    STAFF/OME 100    BESTFIT BALANCE STAFF  Incabloc

100/857
A  327
B  160
C 90
D 50
E 43

BF STAFF.JPG

STAFF 594.JPG

26.5t5 staff.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

I've just measured the staff.  I Haven't removed it yet, so had to use digital verniers instead of a micrometer.

.... and realised that the roller and collet diameters (G and K above) the same for all the staffs !

My measurements are collet 49, roller 41.

I found this on an ebay ad :

image.thumb.png.d1809f59798538aca6d6d06d992b074b.png

If 2796 and 3880 are only for Incabloc, then it's got to be 1855/6. And from the collet sizes, it looks like Ronda 1856 is the one ?

 

 

 

Edited by mikepilk
Posted
21 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Bestfit online is nice but sometimes the physical books are nicer. So 594 is listed as non-Incabloc. Then the problem with finding the size of the staff is you have to have an idea of how long it is. So I've attached images for the 594 staff size and the equivalent balancestaff.com staff and its size. Then one of the problems with aftermarket replacement staffs even if they're made for a specific watch is they tend to vary a little by size. Usually there physically bigger to allow you to reduce things to fit. It's why the length isn't that important the pivots can be longer and then you can just shorten those. So it's always important with balance staffs to measure what you are taking out and comparing to what you put in to avoid unpleasant surprises.

Then because of the confusion I'm also listing of the Bestfit Incabloc number and its size just so you can compare to whatever. 

OME 26.5T3    100/594    STAFF/OME 26.5    BESTFIT BALANCE STAFF

OME 26.5T3    100/857    STAFF/OME 100    BESTFIT BALANCE STAFF  Incabloc

100/857
A  327
B  160
C 90
D 50
E 43

BF STAFF.JPG

STAFF 594.JPG

26.5t5 staff.JPG

Yes I like physical books myself, but it's hard to beat online reference tools for convenience. Great, You found the measurements for 100/594! One thing you mentioned is the fact that many aftermarket staffs tend to vary, but keep in mind not everyone has a lathe or Jacot tool to shorten a staff or reduce a pivot--not trivial!

J

Posted
On 10/22/2018 at 5:08 AM, noirrac1j said:

Yes I like physical books myself, but it's hard to beat online reference tools for convenience. Great, You found the measurements for 100/594! One thing you mentioned is the fact that many aftermarket staffs tend to vary, but keep in mind not everyone has a lathe or Jacot tool to shorten a staff or reduce a pivot--not trivial!

J

The 100/594 looks almost the same as Ronda 1856 - length 330 v 332, collet/roller diameters only 0.01 difference. 

I'll go for which ever I can find.

I don't have a lathe, but do have a Jacot tool, so can only do minor adjustments.

  • Like 1


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that Andy, Yes the new bracelet is worth more than the watch itself, Its one I have bought to service and clean-up and on-sell it as a project, look it may sell to someone who has a small wrist, I think I will buy an extender and may-be offer it up with a normal strap as well CJ
    • Not always that simple. Typically the only reason we would have any way of identifying a watch is if parts were available at any time and somebody had a parts reference book then they would help you to identify the watches that they have parts or. Unfortunately there are hundreds of thousands of watch movements with no identification and of course typically no parts the classic place were watches would be identified would be under the balance wheel and your pictures don't really show a good view of that. Occasionally I've seen watches marked under one of the plates. They felt very proud of their watch is a very prominent Swiss company and they ask he stamped the bottom of a plate so you have disassembled find it. Then there is the other system the keyless parts make up something called the fingerprint system but you still haven't given us enough information to make use of that. Here's an image showing what a fingerprint system looks like. The PDF is based on the physical book the physical book has sizes of watches these are smaller ladies watches and keyless parts which in the physical book are printed at the actual size of the watch parts. So to identify with the keyless we need in your case diameter measured on the dial side and a good picture of the keyless parts and then you have to hope that this was made within the right time span of the books that have this system on the other hand a lot of times on the dial side they will also put markings. So basically to identify a movement it has to come out of the case and has to be disassembled.
    • The strap is a 44Q6JB and hadn't realised how much they'd gone up in price. The used one I've got is very worn but may have other links floating around.
    • @Mercurial is this also a variation of the tool you posted? 
    • Thanks Andy, The bracelet is sized very small, around a 14cm wrist. Were would one try to source original links, I guess they wouldn't be cheap if found. The bracelet end links have 4406 B-E stamped on them, is this the Seiko Bracelet code ?? CJ  
×
×
  • Create New...