Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone using the Bergeon ergonomic oilers?

I’m struggling to deposit the oil from them. They were my first oilers I bought and I ended up buying the standard ones which work very well for me.
If you look at the pic you will see how the oil sits in the middle but does not go to the edges. Hence if you touch the area you want to oil nothing happens. Using them vertically for oiling pivots is impossible.  I really have to angle them to be able to deposit the oil. Being new to this I don’t know whether that’s how it should be and I’m not using them correctly or whether the set I bought is no good.

The pics below show the ergonomic and the standard one.

oil8.jpg

oil9.jpg

Posted

I have the smallest Berg ergonomic and like it for small work (I do a lot of small stuff like Lecoultre 101 104 etc.) and for escapement oiling. I always oil under microscope maybe 15-20x. Otherwise I like the 'normal' black oilers but often modify the tips.

Posted

Did you modify the ergonomic oiler as well? Does the oil sit on yours as it does on mine?
I just don’t know how I could use them, perhaps for posts, touching them with the side of the oiler. The oil is going nowhere if it touch something with the tip.

Posted

It must be me then being a novice. I’ll use the standard ones for now.
Yes, microscope, I do need one. Which one do you use?

Posted

You made me think about it. I struggle to oil the pivots/jewels but can oil smaller metal parts with no problem. It’s got to be the light. I certainly have plenty of it, two long LED strips , I’ve tried it in bright daylight by the window, I tried all sorts but when it comes to jewels and oil and can’t see a thing.
The microscope would probably help.

  • 3 years later...
Posted

I’m with PeterS. I have the red ergonomic and can’t get it to let Moebius 9010 oil on to the spade, though I can see hp1300 because it’s red in colour and possibly because it’s thicker. I’ll continue to use it with hp 1300, but I’ll get the cheaper red one for the 9010

Posted

Stick with the ergonomic. I bought the cheaper one but didn’t use it, I tried but it wasn’t any better if I remember correctly.
As you can see my messages are from 2018, I completely forgot I had these issues. You’ll get used to it. How I got used to it, I don’t know, I only vaguely remember these issues.
By all means, try the cheaper one but I don’t think it will solve your issue.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You also have another potential issue with head and tail stocks, in my research it would seem that for the American style lathes the head and tail stocks were bored as a pair. So a matched pair is good a “pair “ made up from two different lathes cause some headaches. The Swiss Geneva style lathes are much lighter but were apparently made to fit any lathe. I have seen mention of being able to shim the tailstock as well to true up. indexing is again not so straightforward for a watchmaker lathe, at least not as I have found so far. Often a lathe will come with basic indexing which is limited to 60 positions. The full index plates do come up at times for eywatering prices. It is very possible to do that electronically. As well as what @SwissSeiko maybe able to point you to have a look here. https://imakewatches.com/projects/CNCIndexDriver.html   https://imakewatches.com/projects/MillingAttachment.html   Tom
    • On a watch repair discussion group that you know that we love to see naked watches out of the case you show us a box? I think a book on watchmakers lathes should be helpful.   The watchmakers' lathe, its use and abuse; a story of the lathe in its various forms, past and present, its construction and proper uses by     Goodrich, Ward L https://archive.org/details/watchmakerslathe00good  
    • Got it. So a WW lathe will have that graduated drive pulley for different speeds and similar setup for the bed and tailstock, but they won't be fully compatible with one another in terms of parts. Thanks! The picture helps a lot.
    • If only things were so easy...😀. Both lathes in this picture are WW-style lathes.. nuff said? 😉
    • Excellent info, thank you! So when you say "conforms to the standard" does that mean, for example, that parts are interchangeable between brands and ages, or that you could use accessories built for that 110-year old one on a newer one that was built in the 1990s? Also, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions and your patience.
×
×
  • Create New...