Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I was winding my pocket watches yesterday - I give them a once-a-week wind to keep them supple and check condition - and was struck by the apparent balance slowness of my Elgin 571 "B.W. Raymond" as compared with one of my Illinois "Bunn Special" watches. Both RR Grade. So, I made a little video of them side by side with a close up of both balances. I don't know whether you can tell from the video shots but, to me, the amplitude and speed of the Illinois balance (on the left) seem so much greater than that of the Elgin (on the right).

 

So take a look and tell me: which runs fast, which runs slow, and which is keeping dead accurate time.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wBoctO5qOE

 

Answer: They're both keeping dead accurate time - to the second in 24 hours running.

 

My technical question is therefore - how can two similar watches with different amplitudes and speeds run accurately? Is it a question of movement design? Balance wheel size? Length of hairspring, etc?

 

As you can see, my technical knowledge is limited in many respects!

Edited by WillFly
Posted

I suppose they have different BPH. I think the amplitude may also be different. I believe the amplitude affects timing only if very low. But if it decreases, it's good sign the watch needs a service.

 

Try Wildspectra or tickoprint on Android. They will tell you the bph. Those are strong ticks, the phone mic won't have a problem "hearing" them.

Posted (edited)

Hi Will,

I've noticed this before across different manufacturers and grades of watches. My first inclination would be to pin the difference on the spring strength, either by design or just plain wear. Most of the Hamilton's 10s that I service run at an amplitude around 275-295. The Howards and South Bends can peak at 330+! This is even when a new mainspring is installed. So this is why I say design first. Then, I would point to the mainspring wear as the next reason for difference between similar watches of the same size.

 

I believe these are both 18,000bph? And, as was mentioned before, in general, lower amplitude will not have a significant effect in timing unit it is very low, near the end of a wind.

 

That's just what I've observed in my limited experience! Someone else may be able to give you a more detailed(or correct) explanation. :P

Edited by DJW
  • 11 months later...
Posted

Hi Will, I have seen his posts and have learned much from their contributions to the forum. I wanted to ask your help on something I find hard to understand. I am studying the amplitude of balance of a clock, and I would like to show a video that I need to help me determine the approximate amplitude of the balance of this watch. It is an Omega chronometer Lemania 9160A with 41 degrees of lift angle. horizontal. I'll put the video to download it.

 

Amplitude O.9160A 41 deg.doc

 

Thank you so much Guido Velasquez

 

PD

 

I could not post the video. But I'm uploading file is video. Please change the file extension mp4.

 

Posted

Hi Will, I have seen his posts and have learned much from their contributions to the forum. I wanted to ask your help on something I find hard to understand. I am studying the amplitude of balance of a clock, and I would like to show a video that I need to help me determine the approximate amplitude of the balance of this watch. It is an Omega chronometer Lemania 9160A with 41 degrees of lift angle. horizontal. I'll put the video to download it.

 

attachicon.gifAmplitude O.9160A 41 deg.doc

 

Thank you so much Guido Velasquez

 

PD

 

I could not post the video. But I'm uploading file is video. Please change the file extension mp4.

Your Doc does not open on my Mac. There is a vid on youtube my Mark who explains amplitude & beat etc.

Posted

A pendulum clock keeps good time with very low amplitude.

The beat time (timekeeping) of a hairspring balance is independent of amplitude - Google 'simple harmonic motion'.

Large amplitude is to a certain extent a fad of the purist who likes to see that the watch has plenty of power.

And that is an indication of its quality, the state of its mainspring, and its cleanliness.

Posted

To understand the relationship of amplitude versus timekeeping look at page 6/14 of the PDF below. Using a sine wave to represent balance wheel timekeeping/amplitude Makes it a lot easier to understand why one balance wheel it looks like it's moving really fast versus another one moving slow can still keep the same time.

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Test%20and%20measuring%20technology%20mechanical%20watches.pdf

 

Then amplitude does affect timekeeping if the watches in any position other than dial up or dial down. To understand this I've attached an image which shows timekeeping and positional errors versus amplitude. You'll notice on the chart that around 220° positional errors are not a problem.

 

Then comparing pendulum clocks to balance wheels in the watch has a minor technical issue in that clocks are usually stationary with pendulums, watches usually move around. A watch with a high amplitude tends to be influenced less by external influences such as motion.

 

John

 

post-673-0-55813600-1443008079_thumb.jpg

Posted

Amplitude is an interesting subject.  I have noticed with most of the Seiko,s I have serviced although all is OK with good readings I get a low amplitude & the watch runs fine & keeps good time.

Posted

Thank you very much for your help. I thank the documents they share. Well the experience. John, the image in the attached page 45 indicates that it is, is it part of any publication that can get? On this graph, in the illustrated case does it indicate that above 240 degrees the clock is less accurate than 220 degrees? On the comment that makes cdjswiss, I agreement on the "purist" attitude on the extent, and if both the pendulum as the balance wheel is governed by the simple harmonic motion is a waste of energy greater extent where less so direct clock accuracy. While I'll upload the video to yuoutube because I think it was not possible to see it. Clokcboy comment on, I can also say that many clocks go well with a relatively low amplitude. no "as they say in books."

 

Here the link Amplitude.  

 

https://youtu.be/HaZV1kownXM

Posted

 

Then amplitude does affect timekeeping if the watches in any position other than dial up or dial down. To understand this I've attached an image which shows timekeeping and positional errors versus amplitude. You'll notice on the chart that around 220° positional errors are not a problem.

 

John

 

I stand corrected provided that you can give an explanation of the effect of position error! It must be to do with the dynamics of the hairspring. Maybe higher amplitude (faster motion) contributes to maintaining the hairspring shape when it is not horizontal and even higher angular velocity does something else. But surely the curves do not always, for all hairsprings, cross the zero at 220deg?

 

The clock example was merely to illustrate shm.

 

Colin.

Posted

On the relationship between the amplitude of the balance and accuracy, here's an interesting analysis performed 10 hours a stopwatch Omega Lemania 9160A.

They may be some small fluctuations in the curve Daily Rate and Beat Error, but not reflected nothing in amplitude. Notes that although as wind loses its tension, and the amplitude decreases from 270 degrees. up to 220 degrees, the rate is maintained.

It is also important to say that the nominal elevation angle was changed from 41 degrees to 45 degrees in this experiment. The Watch-O-Scope program is an excellent tool in this analysis.

 

post-670-0-50074600-1443128104_thumb.png

Posted

Hi Guidovela, I like your graph. Looks like a winner.

 

When working on the beat error, like on Marks last video, with the movement where one has to turn the collet manually with a screwdriver to adjust beat error, how to do get it so accurate? It seems to me like a process of guess work, and a long dangerous process to adjust each time (could take 10 attempts to get it to approx 0.1ms). To get it really accurate by turning the collet could end in misery, or could make the previous adjustment worse (when working below for example 1ms). Am I missing a trick here?

Posted (edited)
Michael is right. There is no Trick. First precise hands. Second patience because if you overdo it can take several attempts to bring its optimum setting. I think for watchmakers should be a little easier. But even for them should be a moment of great concentration and applied all his experience. In my case, some watches little value, not worth trying to bring them to such high levels. I leave you in 1.1- 1.9 of beat error. It has its irony, because if you do something wrong with a watch Omega will have a high price.

What I do is I take to practice running watches. So when I have a better quality, I feel a little safer.

You can see the links where I have other graphics streams watches.

 


Edited by guidovelasquez

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
    • I found a motor that is 3/4 hp and another that is 1.2hp. They come with speed controller. So I don’t think I would need a wiring diagram. But I sure appreciate you offering your help! Do you think 1.2 hp would be too much for a watchmaker’s lathe?
×
×
  • Create New...