Jump to content

Strange Lathe Thread


jdrichard

Recommended Posts

I have a Boley Leinen Reform Lathe that has a nut that you adjust to tighten and loosen the lathe spindle bearings. The thread on the male part of the spindle shaft are flat on the top. Like the top of the mountains have been chopped off. The mating thread on the nut also has the mountain peeks chopped off. Any guess what the reason. The TAP is a 1/2” 20 TPI SAE. And i need to make a nut that is tighter fitting.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, is your plan to make a lock-nut to bind the existing nut against?

Replace an the existing nut with one that binds. Almost done: Update3f31b917a9655cba8a1fc9d2e0c6f183.jpgb2c556ff6c46f3b92effb614b0c56109.jpg323e2c54ac26e6dcf9aef3ab5bad2db3.jpg34dbc14cf344fef5409a8adb67e78695.jpgFlattening the peeks
dd455a561809a6104ff4bd3796f93719.jpg9f45b7e79411a529559c3094794ac748.jpg
Still need to shave it down a bit and then cut it on one side and compress it slightly

How springy is brass and should i heat it before i compress it a bit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/03/2018 at 1:16 AM, jdrichard said:

2444eb5befd09e50d2077a8cdf6a9a41.jpg
This is the start of my alternate nut that i need to complete and tap and somehow cut the peeks off the mountains.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

it looks like something called a butress thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, jdrichard said:


Interesting. Wide thread makes it mot durable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

    well,  the point is,  it is not a simple or a common thread.  "by any other name"  it's not easy to  duplicate without a machine shop.  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/16/2018 at 6:31 AM, rodabod said:

A German lathe with an American thread?

no kidding....I'd almost be willing to bet the lathe its a 12 x 1.5 thread.   Give a 12 x 1.5 tap a try.

Acme?  Buttress?  easily identified with a straight on shot of the male thread but I'll go double or nothing on the lathe bet they're not :).  If anything it would be trapezoid because its German but the pitch is way too fine, and there is no reason for it in that application.  Afaik you don't see many buttress threads outside of collets and the odd vise screw.

Why do you need the nut tighter?  Afaik its suppose have two nuts so you can lock them, i.e. staying in its spot isn't a function of the nut being tight on the shaft.  You can't really have a nut tight on a screw, there has to be clearance or it won't turn.  If its sloppy, that means too much clearance - you need a tap with a smaller pitch dia (taps are sold for the different classes of thread fit).   But i'm betting the issues the wrong thread identification.

If you did want to make it tight on the screw, you'd have to split, pry it open slightly, then thread which you can do with a tap.  Its not really a practical solution imo....when you do have to lock a nut on a thread you do so with small set screw with a brass underneath (ala Schaublin and Aciera)

End of the day I'll bet the solution is simple - a 12 x 1.5 nut that fits much better.  Make two so its a lock nut arrangement :)

 

 

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

no kidding....I'd almost be willing to bet the lathe its a 12 x 1.5 thread.   Give a 12 x 1.5 tap a try.
Acme?  Buttress?  easily identified with a straight on shot of the male thread but I'll go double or nothing on the lathe bet they're not [emoji4].  If anything it would be trapezoid because its German but the pitch is way too fine, and there is no reason for it in that application.  Afaik you don't see many buttress threads outside of collets and the odd vise screw.
Why do you need the nut tighter?  Afaik its suppose have two nuts so you can lock them, i.e. staying in its spot isn't a function of the nut being tight on the shaft.  You can't really have a nut tight on a screw, there has to be clearance or it won't turn.  If its sloppy, that means too much clearance - you need a tap with a smaller pitch dia (taps are sold for the different classes of thread fit).   But i'm betting the issues the wrong thread identification.
If you did want to make it tight on the screw, you'd have to split, pry it open slightly, then thread which you can do with a tap.  Its not really a practical solution imo....when you do have to lock a nut on a thread you do so with small set screw with a brass underneath (ala Schaublin and Aciera)
End of the day I'll bet the solution is simple - a 12 x 1.5 nut that fits much better.  Make two so its a lock nut arrangement [emoji4]
 
 

I think i found the final solution



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

no kidding....I'd almost be willing to bet the lathe its a 12 x 1.5 thread.   Give a 12 x 1.5 tap a try.
Acme?  Buttress?  easily identified with a straight on shot of the male thread but I'll go double or nothing on the lathe bet they're not [emoji4].  If anything it would be trapezoid because its German but the pitch is way too fine, and there is no reason for it in that application.  Afaik you don't see many buttress threads outside of collets and the odd vise screw.
Why do you need the nut tighter?  Afaik its suppose have two nuts so you can lock them, i.e. staying in its spot isn't a function of the nut being tight on the shaft.  You can't really have a nut tight on a screw, there has to be clearance or it won't turn.  If its sloppy, that means too much clearance - you need a tap with a smaller pitch dia (taps are sold for the different classes of thread fit).   But i'm betting the issues the wrong thread identification.
If you did want to make it tight on the screw, you'd have to split, pry it open slightly, then thread which you can do with a tap.  Its not really a practical solution imo....when you do have to lock a nut on a thread you do so with small set screw with a brass underneath (ala Schaublin and Aciera)
End of the day I'll bet the solution is simple - a 12 x 1.5 nut that fits much better.  Make two so its a lock nut arrangement [emoji4]
 
 

So i could buy a 12x1.5 nut, correct? And cut it and make it sprung. The nut hole is a 29/64 inch prior to taping.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you got the pallet fork installed in the movement when you see the train move when using the setting works? As nevenbekriev said, without the pallet fork to lock the train, the behaviour you are describing is normal. If this is happening with the pallet fork installed, you have a problem in the gear train, it should be immobile when the pallet fork is locking the escape wheel.  The fit of the circlip above the pinions on that wheel is crooked in your pictures, it should sit flat up against the upper pinion as in Marc’s picture.  Hope that helps, Mark
    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
×
×
  • Create New...