Jump to content

Balance Complete Size Interchangeability


Recommended Posts

I am unable (can't find it) to source a replacement for a FEF 380/381 Balance Complete and was wondering if I could use another 11.5 (or even 10.5) lignes movement's balance complete as a replacement. What are the pro's/con's of doing this sort of franken-work. I know back in the day this practice was not frowned upon as much as it nowadays, but with a dwindling supply of parts I don't see what other options we hobbyist have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a few on ebay:

https://www.ebay.it/itm/Balance-complete-F-E-F-FEF-FLEURIER-350-380-380-2-bilanciere-completo-721-NOS-/162699375077?hash=item25e1a371e5

This seller has incabloc version or kif version for sale,

6 hours ago, dralexmv said:

wondering if I could use another 11.5 (or even 10.5) lignes movement's balance complete as a replacement

If you mean take a balance from another FEF 380 donor movement yes, but if you mean taking a similar size movement of different manufacture and using that then no I would not think so there are just too many variables to list to make it a option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, dralexmv said:

I am unable (can't find it) to source a replacement for a FEF 380/381 Balance Complete and was wondering if I could use another 11.5 (or even 10.5) lignes movement's balance complete as a replacement. What are the pro's/con's of doing this sort of franken-work. I know back in the day this practice was not frowned upon as much as it nowadays, but with a dwindling supply of parts I don't see what other options we hobbyist have.

The problem will be the balance staff will be most likely the wrong length. I have in the past used the a hairspring from a different calibre. Providing the hairspring is for a watch that is of the same Ligne and the hairspring has the same end stud style it works fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can use a smaller balance complete as long as the correct staff fits, and you manage to get the terminal curve of the hairspring to work with the correct radius so that it is centred between the curb pins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/7/2018 at 2:50 AM, rodabod said:

You can use a smaller balance complete as long as the correct staff fits,

A small amount of change shouldn't be a problem but if you get really creative and go super small then they'll be a consequence. The hairspring has another characteristic that you normally don't think about which is it supplies the energy to unlock the escapement. So if we got super creative and put a really tiny balance wheel in the watch it just wouldn't work at all or somewhere in between it may not work very well.

So when adapting a different balance wheels as mentioned the staff will need to be changed. Also the roller jewel has to be a the right size and in the right location. Then the safety roller also has to be right otherwise you're going to have to change the guard pin length.

Now we get to all the strange things about this watch like for instance two separate balance staffs you learn that at the link below the reason given is "balance with/without screws". Bestfit also lists two separate staffs and two separate balance completes I have The balance completes listed below. Then the size of this watch is interesting the 350 is 10 1/2 line and the 380 is 11 1/2 line. I suspect both watches are probably identical except a larger plate for the 380. It would be a way for a company to have two separate watches without having to manufacture entirely two separate watches.

721/268

DOX 140      PES 380
FEF 350      DIRECT CENTER SECOND
FEF 380      DIRECT CENTER SECOND
FEF 380-2    DIRECT CENTER SECOND CALENDAR
PES 350      DIRECT CENTER SECOND
PES 355     
PES 380      DIRECT CENTER SECOND
PES 385     
ROL 380-2

721/269
BALANCE COMPLETE
INCA/FEF 350

DOX 140      PES 380
FEF 350      DIRECT CENTER SECOND
FEF 380      DIRECT CENTER SECOND
FEF 380-2    DIRECT CENTER SECOND CALENDAR
PES 350      DIRECT CENTER SECOND
PES 355     
PES 380      DIRECT CENTER SECOND
PES 385

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&FEF_350

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&FEF_380

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now I'm making do with a similar micrometer (the one below is $45 shipped but you can find better deals) and a $20 stand. You do have to be excruciatingly careful measuring jewels, since there's no table, but if you don't have the $500 to throw around, it's a nice option.
    • As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!
    • Next one up an AS 554, looks like a bit more to this one. First job is to check thickness, most springs are somewhere between .3 and .4, this one measures .35, that matches in with the .4 spring steel i ordered. So for marking up a permanent marker comes in handy to colour up the steel to be marked later with a scriber once its dry. Bestfit provide the extra bit of info for the jumper spring that is missing.
    • Thanks again, Marc.  Super helpful. I was wondering what the hole was for, and now it makes perfect sense. With your help and the other members here, it looks like I'm good to go with my Seitz tool set. I had to order some replacement pushers, but with those, the set is complete and in good condition. Now, I need to figure out what tool to buy to measure jewels (amongst other watch-related parts). I had my eye on the JKA Feintaster micrometers, but people get crazy bidding on them for $400-600 USD. I was thinking of just a regular digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). Thoughts?  Mahalo. Frank      
    • Yep, that's exactly how it should fit. The reamer shank is tapered and the socket in the spindle is also tapered so that the one centers in the other and is gripped tightly. If there is any wobble when the reamer is seated as far it will go then there is a problem. The cross hole in the spindle is to allow you the push the reamer back out again. If the reamer seated much deeper then it would limit the access for pushing it back out again. Here is one of mine for comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...