Jump to content

How do I remove movement on Tissot quartz watch


pmcfadd

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I am new here. I have a Tissot Quartz watch from ca. 1980. It has been sitting in a draw for years because the crystal is badly scratched and it is in need of a good clean.

I would like to replace the crystal myself and have removed the back; crown and what seemed like two retaining screws for the movement. However the movement refuses to come out although it rotates in the housing. On having a closer look it seems to be locked in place. Could anyone tell me if this is a locking ring and if so how do I remove it? If not do I have to remove the movement from the front. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You!

Tissot.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DSCN0542.thumb.JPG.c496809236f9d57202643d5f8ff875be.JPGDSCN0541.thumb.JPG.e4747e0fd6d2093c502e4746926de876.JPGDSCN0546.thumb.JPG.60e481c746d62cfa92fd1448e72cf2a1.JPG

Hello again, Thanks for the feedback.

Here is a front and side picture. As I mentioned before the movement rotates inside the case and that why the display is 180° to where it should be.

I will try putting the screws back in and give it a few taps to see if that helps although it seems to be locked in place from the back. The diameter of the movement seems about about 0,5 mm bigger than the hole in the housing.

image.png.7b73d4f60121ffe16b94fd455bc34951.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DSCN0542.thumb.JPG.c496809236f9d57202643d5f8ff875be.JPGDSCN0541.thumb.JPG.e4747e0fd6d2093c502e4746926de876.JPGDSCN0546.thumb.JPG.60e481c746d62cfa92fd1448e72cf2a1.JPG
Hello again, Thanks for the feedback.
Here is a front and side picture. As I mentioned before the movement rotates inside the case and that why the display is 180° to where it should be.
I will try putting the screws back in and give it a few taps to see if that helps although it seems to be locked in place from the back. The diameter of the movement seems about about 0,5 mm bigger than the hole in the housing.
image.png.7b73d4f60121ffe16b94fd455bc34951.png
That's not a front loader. Still think the movement comes out with the ring. See pics of similar, on my Vostok that I've just replaced the mainspring 47b447ec1da7bed48a5510cad71f4dc1.jpg38dd07a36e335113246a59b5e18803a7.jpg

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I spy two small holes in that ring around the back of the movement.

2ADDABA3-20F0-44FB-A095-6D66FBE1A416.jpeg.15433fe24857a3157c40aad2576dcc5a.jpeg

Sorry this is a poor markup, but I’ve drawn 2 rough circles where I think I see the holes. So does this ring work like a circlip? If you put 2 pins in the holes can you squeeze them together to compress the ring?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can also avoid removing the bezel or mov.t. Just close it replacing back and crown gaskets, then polish out the scratches (that's a bit of a messy work) as described in various threads here, use search function on the top right. Although it seems to have a flat crystal which cost about $1, then a press is needed to fit it back, and few more tools for a proper work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Guys, Thanks for all the advice. It came out from the front after all. I just had to find the correct place to insert the knife.  I will have a look if I can repair the scratches in the crystal before I press it out. They are quite deep though so now that I'm this far I think I would like to replace it.  Also I would like to give the case a good clean and remove the scratches. 

20171222_144054.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pmcfadd said:

Hi Guys, Thanks for all the advice. It came out from the front after all. I just had to find the correct place to insert the knife.  I will have a look if I can repair the scratches in the crystal before I press it out. They are quite deep though so now that I'm this far I think I would like to replace it.  Also I would like to give the case a good clean and remove the scratches. 

20171222_144054.jpg

You could probably fit a generic crystal instead of the original . With a new plastic gasket. Take care not to break the crystal when reinstall the combo. Been there done that as they say :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, digginstony said:

Never would of took that to be a frontloader.

If you look at the pics, the dial is slightly bigger than the back opening. I didn't do forensics pixel counting, but you get the idea :)

The ring (circlip or not) which the OP correctly identified to overlap the mov.t is meant to keep it firmly sandwiched even with caseback removed for battery changes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at the pics, the dial is slightly bigger than the back opening. I didn't do forensics pixel counting, but you get the idea [emoji4]
The ring (circlip or not) which the OP correctly identified to overlap the mov.t is meant to keep the it firmly sandwiched even with caseback removed for battery changes. 
Interesting but I thought the movement was screwed into the ring and if they came out together and that's why I didn't bear relevance to the overlap [emoji16]

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pmcfadd said:

Hi Guys, Thanks for all the advice. It came out from the front after all. I just had to find the correct place to insert the knife.  I will have a look if I can repair the scratches in the crystal before I press it out. They are quite deep though so now that I'm this far I think I would like to replace it.  Also I would like to give the case a good clean and remove the scratches. 

20171222_144054.jpg

Well done. The answer is always there if you stare hard enough at the parts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done. The answer is always there if you stare hard enough at the parts!
Interesting to know what those holes were and their purpose. It was a good observation and a circlip fixing, a very sound idea.
Also a sprung circlip could aid shock protection to the movement.
I never come across a movement so fixed but hopefully there's always time [emoji16]

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks,   I have now cleaned the case and it's looking good. Been working on the crystal and have managed to get all the scratches out but having trouble getting back to a polished finish at the moment. I have really enjoyed the project though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
    • Hello As I am learning, does anyone have any recommendations  on Repair and sourcing in Gold Coast, Qld, Australia ? eg old Seiko coil 4002920 Thanks. Cheers, Ken
    • Is this what all you're looking for? 
×
×
  • Create New...