Jump to content

Create own watch from existing movement?


Recommended Posts

I've come across this online site that sell movements without the face or the dials or anything. It is the online shop for a physical shop that is close to me but I was wondering what is the reason behind selling these movements like this? Is it to build your own watch by choosing a face and the hands and all that or is it to practice with. Some clearer info would be appreciated

 

Untitled.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could do that but in most cases its to replace an existing movement in a watch because quite often that is the most economical thing to do with quartz movements especially total replacement of the movement is often the cheapest and quickest option than expending the time and effort to fix an existing movement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of these movements are quartz. When repairing a quartz watch, a new movement is often the most cost effective fix. The same can be true of inexpensive mechanical watches. That’s why most new bare movements are bought.
You could as you suggest build your own watch, and some folks will rescue a dead mechanical watch with a quartz movement.
Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaah that makes more sense. The odds of finding the exact movement for the one you need might be a bit slim? I've also wondered about the watch balance wheel. Do they all differ depending on the movement they are being used in or are the more basic mechanical watches using a standard type of balance wheel?

Thanks for the info so far. I'm most likely going to asking questions as they come up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaah that makes more sense. The odds of finding the exact movement for the one you need might be a bit slim? I've also wondered about the watch balance wheel. Do they all differ depending on the movement they are being used in or are the more basic mechanical watches using a standard type of balance wheel?
Thanks for the info so far. I'm most likely going to asking questions as they come up.
Interesting and I see where you're coming from but interchangeable parts does not denote cheapness, in fact it's the opposite. The initial set up of such machinery would be beyond the financial capabilities of most watchmakers.
Seiko enjoy a high degree of interchangeable parts including balance assemblies which is why they may be so popular with the watch repairer

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Neileg said:

Balance wheels aren’t really standardised but a dozen quartz movements might cover 90% of the watches you come across.

What diggingstony meant to say is simply that Seiko balances are interchangeable across 7S, 4R, 6R, 70x and may be even older movements. Indeed, a nice point for repairers and tinkerers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What diggingstony meant to say is simply that Seiko balances are interchangeable across 7S, 4R, 6R, 70x and may be even older movements. Indeed, a nice point for repairers and tinkerers.

Yes I understood the point. All I meant was that quartz movements are less varied than mechanical watches (on the whole).
Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
    • Yes, the arbor usually makes about 3 to 3.5 turns. But usually spring takes 2/3 to 3/4 of the free space in barrel, not 1/2, so take it for the calcullations. This way the change in torque is smaller. I have a picture for You, this one is little older, but no mater
    • I overhauled a ladies Rolex and noticed erratic performance so I stripped in down again and did fault finding. This is what I saw. The lower jewel (the one in the plate) is cracked and the hole is too big. Before discovering this, I stripped down and re-cleaned the main-plate (and parts) by hand with a fine natural fiber brush. I somehow missed the fault the first time and cannot understand how it was still running. Perhaps re-cleaning it dislodged some pieces of the jewel widening the hole? I don't know. Now I need to replace the jewel but don't have a Seitz tool. The Rolex part is 2130-0913 and the top and bottom are the same. The part comes complete in brass setting with KIF elastor spring and cap jewel. Note: I have never replaced a jewel. I do have a good vintage stacking set that I've used quite a bit.  Can I replace using a stacking set? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  
×
×
  • Create New...