Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello there.

I've just gotten my new Timegrapher and started to check our watches. I tested this vintage Tissot (20mm long) and the Rate reading was +350 s/d and Beat Error 0.2 ms after I have moved the lever all the way to the left (slowing it down) it reads now +130 s/d but unfortunately the Beat Error went up to 9.0 ms. THis watch haven't used for about 10 years and looking at it, it seems to be very clean, so I guess it might need to be oiled but other than that, what else I need to do? Shall I move the other leverI've marked in the photo (as I understand it regulates the beat rates and I see many warns not to move it)?

Thank you for your help!

001_Tissot.jpg

002_Tissot.jpg

Posted

I can't say that Ive encountered a vintage watch with the lever that you usually shouldn't touch being in the wrong position so far but it can happen, obviously.

I'm assuming you just have to set both of them in such a way until you get it right but I do believe that you should first disassemble, clean and service the movement firstly and only afterwards "play" with the levers although you might just have to adjust the regulator.

  • Like 1
Posted

Afer a few hours of playing with the levers this is what I've ended up with, but unfortunately, the results only good when the watch is laying flat, nevertheless comparing what I've started with +350 s/d. I feel that it is fair enough for my first time. Thanks for the suggestions and encouragements guys.

003_Tissot.jpg

Posted

There is not enough amplitude (bare minimum 200 deg. on Swiss mov.t) to make it run reliably. The wavy pattern indicates that the mainspring struggles in providing constant power. The watch might be able to keep good time, but that would be a lucky occurrence. Certainly you did a good job in regulating for a first time.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, jdm said:

There is not enough amplitude (bare minimum 200 deg. on Swiss mov.t) to make it run reliably. The wavy pattern indicates that the mainspring struggles in providing constant power. The watch might be able to keep good time, but that would be a lucky occurrence. Certainly you did a good job in regulating for a first time.

Good to know. Thank you

Posted

A little more detail... the part that you have labelled S F is the hairspring stud holder, moving this changes where the point of rest of the impulse pin/roller jewel is in relation to the pallet fork, by moving this around you change the distance of each half of the balance swing (the tick and tock)

The other part noted is regulator arm which holds the curb pins, these change the effective length of the hairspring to regulate the timing. Moving them further away from the stud holder (in this case clockwise) will shorten the hairspring, making the watch gain time. Moving them closer to the stud holder (anti-clockwise) lengthen the hairspring, making the watch lose time.

As you found, there is a relationship between the 2 parts, that mean changing one affects the other.

Tom

  • Like 1
Posted

The low amplitude could  be lack of cleanliness i.e. oil congealed oil/dirt in the balance jewels. This will slow to balance with a greater effect showing crown up/down etc. This watch in my opinion needs a service & clean & re-lubricating before any further adjustments. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, clockboy said:

The low amplitude could  be lack of cleanliness i.e. oil congealed oil/dirt in the balance jewels. This will slow to balance with a greater effect showing crown up/down etc. This watch in my opinion needs a service & clean & re-lubricating before any further adjustments. 

I thought so and was thinking more about lubricating it (I guess as a person who has never dealt with taking things apart, I am kind of avoiding it, but now I have to do it obviously). Thank you for letting me know.

Posted
1 hour ago, PJA said:

I thought so and was thinking more about lubricating it (I guess as a person who has never dealt with taking things apart, I am kind of avoiding it, but now I have to do it obviously).

That is a ladies mov.t which makes it more difficult for a beginner, definitely not recommended. To learn is better that you choose a larger one. Follow Mark's lessons for examples.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jdm said:

That is a ladies mov.t which makes it more difficult for a beginner, definitely not recommended. To learn is better that you choose a larger one. Follow Mark's lessons for examples.

 

3 hours ago, PJA said:

I thought so and was thinking more about lubricating it (I guess as a person who has never dealt with taking things apart, I am kind of avoiding it, but now I have to do it obviously). Thank you for letting me know.

Yes, start with a basic 19'" swiss pocket watch movement first!

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, PJA said:

I thought so and was thinking more about lubricating it (I guess as a person who has never dealt with taking things apart, I am kind of avoiding it, but now I have to do it obviously). Thank you for letting me know.

Just lubricating the watch is not a good idea. It could make matters worse because if it is dirty you are just making a bigger sludge for the pivots to turn in. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, clockboy said:

Just lubricating the watch is not a good idea. It could make matters worse because if it is dirty you are just making a bigger sludge for the pivots to turn in. 

SO you think I should take a chance and try to clean it or first practice on a few bigger watches I've ordered from eBay amongst them Siko 7s26?

Posted

I don't know what experience you have but stripping, cleaning, re-assembly and lubrication are the very basics all watch repairers or hobbyist should have.  If not confident with this then I suggest leave well alone as it is very easy to distroy a watch.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/12/2017 at 7:49 AM, PJA said:

seems to be very clean, so I guess it might need to be oiled

The problem with visually looking at a watch and seeing that it's clean isn't really a fair assessment of the condition of the watch. Combined with a timing machine result especially if the amplitude is incredibly low is better. That tells you that while it may look clean it's not clean as others have noted above. The problem with lubrication it doesn't just disappear in it can do a variety of things including get very gummy which results in low amplitude. Depending upon how well the watch was sealed Moisture can get in pivots can get rusty. Then combined with fresh new lubricant it makes a really nice grinding compound.

Then as far as starting with a Seiko wristwatch Like the 7s26 It's still considered a small watch to start with your better off with a pocket watch movement to practice assembling and disassembling. What works really well for beginners watch is the 6497 Or 6498. You can either buy the Swiss or the Chinese clone of this on eBay it's basically a nice big wristwatch. Then as you can buy the movement you not destroying a total watch just in case something undesirable happens which usually happens to beginners.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, PJA said:

SO you think I should take a chance and try to clean it or first practice on a few bigger watches I've ordered from eBay amongst them Siko 7s26?

That is what many "quick learners" have chosen, including myself. One good reason is when you get it working you may end with a nice current watch of any size rather than a vintage looking large one. Personally I didn't find anything very difficult working on it.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, clockboy said:

I don't know what experience you have but stripping, cleaning, re-assembly and lubrication are the very basics all watch repairers or hobbyist should have.  If not confident with this then I suggest leave well alone as it is very easy to distroy a watch.

I don't have any experience except changing batteries and some minor repairs of fixing contact on a Timex watch, I started reading some books, but I usually feel much more comfortable asking here before making I start working on something because of the wealth of knowledge that the members have here. As you can tell I am the kind of person who makes small steps first before I start running.

Posted
1 hour ago, jdm said:

That is what many "quick learners" have chosen, including myself. One good reason is when you get it working you may end with a nice current watch of any size rather than a vintage looking large one. Personally I didn't find anything very difficult working on it.

Also with Mark's great video lessons of how to Disassemble/Assemble the 7s26 on Youtube, I think I'll be able to take care of the 7s26.

Posted
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

What works really well for beginners watch is the 6497 Or 6498. You can either buy the Swiss or the Chinese clone of this on eBay it's basically a nice big wristwatch. 

1

I'll be looking for these movements. Thanks.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...